: Growing Coalition Opposes Army Land Grab


Crowdog
12-17-2002, 11:40 AM
Patterson from the Center for Biological Diversity now thinks he is a military strategist. :rolleyes:

Jon

---------------------------------------------------------
Growing Coalition Opposes Army Land Grab


Nearly one hundred public interest and community groups protested the Army's plan to expand tank training in the Mojave Desert, which would destroy over 100,000 acres of pristine desert lands and sabotage the future recovery of an endangered plant and animal.

The environmental, religious and public health organizations, said in a letter to Secretary of Interior Gale Norton that the Army's proposal to expand the Fort Irwin National Training Center would destroy what are now protected public lands, including potential wilderness areas. Tanks would also overrun a region critical to the recovery of the threatened desert tortoise and endangered Lane Mountain milkvetch, both of which are listed under the Endangered Species Act.

"The desert tortoise and the Lane Mountain milkvetch don't stand much of a chance against the Army's tanks. The desert tortoise's future is already precarious, and we can't afford the loss of this many animals and this much of their habitat," said Dr. Michael Connor with Desert Tortoise Preserve Committee."

The expansion also engulfs part or all of two Wilderness Study Areas in the Avawatz Mountains, an area known for its colorful and rugged mountains, desert bighorn sheep, the historic Old Spanish Emigrant Trail and Shoshone tribal artifacts. "The loss of these potential wilderness areas and their natural and cultural values is irrevocable. Torah prohibits the extinction of species and commands us to choose life. This sanctuary for desert plants and wildlife merits permanent protection and this expansion will forever eliminate that option," said Barak Gale with the Coalition on Environment and Jewish Life.

The group charges the Secretary to bar the expansion until the Army fully justifies the need for this expansion. "We are fighting this proposed expansion for the wildlife and wilderness that is rapidly disappearing from the California desert. The current huge base is the size of Rhode Island and has proven an effective training ground." He adds, "The Army has not justified taking this land from the public and wildlife to support the fading defense strategy of tank warfare." said Daniel Patterson, Desert Ecologist with the Center for Biological Diversity. The groups point out that the costs of addressing the impacts to the desert tortoise alone could cost 300 million dollars.

The coalition criticizes current legislation that prematurely gives the expansion lands to the Army prior to compliance with environmental and public health laws. "Giving the Army 100,000 acres of unprotected wilderness and critical tortoise habitat before they can demonstrate compliance with environmental laws is unacceptable-it's absolutely backwards," said Paul Spitler of the California Wilderness Coalition.

Slinky
12-19-2002, 11:01 PM
Hmmmm..
Maybe the desert tortoise and Lane Mountain milkvetch are endangered cuz they've out-lived their time and aren't meant to survive? WTF is a milkvetch anyway? And WTF is a turtle living in the desert? I thought turtles liked water? That shell's got to be freakin' hot in the summer.

Just some random thoughts.

YellowSub1962
12-20-2002, 12:48 AM
generally the milkvetch is considered an obnoxious weed by most average people...bioligists can go on about how it is the key to universe, but its still just a plant...

the tortise is a similar to a turtle, except for the fact that most tortises never go in water (they can't swim like turtles), and they are vegetarians...over the last few thousand years they've adapted well to life on land, and are found around the world - generally in hot dry climates....

the California Desert tortise population has fluctuated in the past but seems to be holding steady at this point in time, some feel the numbers are low, others don't see a problem - I'm sure you can figure out which people have the problem with the "low" numbers :rolleyes:

and actually, humans are not the number one threat to Ca Desert Tortises, respiratory infections are, with coyotes running a close second place....


:usa:

Slinky
12-24-2002, 12:38 PM
Originally posted by YellowSub1962
and actually, humans are not the number one threat to Ca Desert Tortises, respiratory infections are, with coyotes running a close second place....
:usa: So what we really need to save the tortoise is more armed wheelers trained to administer antibiotics to reptiles.

YellowSub1962
01-09-2003, 10:45 PM
FEDERAL AGENCIES FAIL IN DESERT TORTOISE RECOVERY

1/8/03 San Diego. Public land access advocates served a notice of intent to sue to federal agencies on Wednesday charging that the U.S. Department of Interior, and its two subordinate agencies, the United Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) have knowingly and negligently impeded the recovery of the desert tortoise since its listing as "threatened" in 1989.
The four organizations, primarily off road groups, claim that the DOI, USFWS and BLM have failed to take reasonable steps to arrest the spread of Upper Respiratory Tract Disease (URTD), which is suspected to be the primary cause of dramatic declines in desert tortoise populations. The action also cites the agencies' failure to properly monitor the recovery efforts, and claim the agencies have ignored the growing body of science that indicates URTD, along with raven predation, are driving the species rapidly toward extinction throughout the deserts of California, Arizona, Nevada and Utah.
This action also follows the release of a report from the General Accounting Office (GAO), which indicates that federal government has spent over $100 million in the last 12 years trying to protect the tortoise; with little or no evidence these efforts have made any difference.
"The DOI efforts to recover the desert tortoise have been an abject failure.," states David P. Hubbard an environmental attorney who filed the notice. "Millions of dollars have been expended, and millions of acres of federal land have been closed off to public use; yet the tortoise continues to spiral towards extinction."
The filing will heat up the battle between recreationists and those who want to close the desert to off-road vehicles and campers. Since 1994, millions of acres of public lands have been closed off from motorized access, making over 14% of California inaccessible to the public.
"The federal agencies are being driven to closure decisions by environmental lawsuits, and fail to consider the science or economical impact of the communities that are affected.," states Michelle Cassella of AMA D-37 Sports Committee, the lead organization in the action. "Recent studies funded in part by off road interests clearly indicate that in many cases the public has little or no impact on threatened species. Ironically, it is the trails and highways in the desert that provide barriers for disease transmission among tortoise populations."
Other plaintiffs in the action include the California Off Road Vehicle Association (CORVA), Off Road Business Association (ORBA), and the San Diego Off Road Vehicle Association (SDORC).
David Hubbard is an environmental and land use attorney with the firm of Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch, LLP located in San Diego, CA. He represents public land advocates who have filed the 60 Day Notice of Intent to Sue. (760) 496-0776



:usa: