Richard Dekkard
09-24-2003, 07:40 PM
http://66.54.161.206/pictures/rover/DSCN7844sm.jpg
http://66.54.161.206/pictures/rover/DSCN7846sm.jpg
http://66.54.161.206/pictures/rover/DSCN7864sm.jpg
Richard Dekkard
09-24-2003, 07:41 PM
http://66.54.161.206/pictures/rover/rally004sm.jpg
http://66.54.161.206/pictures/rover/rally005sm.jpg
http://66.54.161.206/pictures/rover/rally006sm.jpg
Richard Dekkard
09-24-2003, 07:42 PM
http://66.54.161.206/pictures/rover/rally007sm.jpg
http://66.54.161.206/pictures/rover/rally008sm.jpg
http://66.54.161.206/pictures/rover/rally009sm.jpg
Richard Dekkard
09-24-2003, 07:43 PM
http://66.54.161.206/pictures/rover/rally010sm.jpg
http://66.54.161.206/pictures/rover/rally013sm.jpg
http://66.54.161.206/pictures/rover/rally014sm.jpg
Richard Dekkard
09-24-2003, 07:44 PM
http://66.54.161.206/pictures/rover/rally020sm.jpg
http://66.54.161.206/pictures/rover/rally022sm.jpg
http://66.54.161.206/pictures/rover/rally023sm.jpg
Hope they work this time...
Came up kind of small on my computer could you make the file size any bigger so that they can take longer to load?
:D
Old Scout
09-24-2003, 07:50 PM
1600x1200 at 6 megs each !!! Come awn! :mad3:
Edit:
some are 2048x1536 at 14 megs!
Richard Dekkard
09-24-2003, 07:54 PM
should be fine now...
what was I thinking??? sorry...
Old Scout
09-24-2003, 08:23 PM
Originally posted by Richard Dekkard
should be fine now...
what was I thinking??? sorry...
Mucho better on the size, but there still over a meg each. Anything over 72DPI is a waste of bandwidth.
Richard Dekkard
09-24-2003, 08:29 PM
recalibrate your scope Spock!!!
They are 100k give or take each... :D