: Definately NOT DSI approved !!


BillaVista
01-02-2002, 02:28 PM
Hey DSI ya bum,

Check the first bold item at the link!

http://www.qkiss.com/axle40spline.htm

So ya think ya know more about axle building than Strange eh? :flipoff2: :flipoff2:

Bill stirs the pot

mike
01-02-2002, 02:41 PM
Originally posted by BillaVista
Hey DSI ya bum,

Check the first bold item at the link!

http://www.qkiss.com/axle40spline.htm

So ya think ya know more about axle building than Strange eh? :flipoff2: :flipoff2:

Bill stirs the pot

Wait, weren't you a proponent of tapered axleshafts? ;)

wngrog
01-02-2002, 02:52 PM
I don't know the origional argument but "reduces weight" is a lame reason. How much weight could it reduce?

Kind of like a runner shaving his body to run faster :rolleyes:

mike
01-02-2002, 03:26 PM
ounces of rotational weight becomes important when you're being timed across a 1/4 mile.

liveaxle
01-02-2002, 07:03 PM
What's the point of discussion here?

http://www.qkiss.com/Axle40spline.jpg

BillaVista
01-02-2002, 07:26 PM
Wait, weren't you a proponent of tapered axleshafts

Noooooo. I believe "necked down" is the coloquialism (had to use that wurd since you use "proponant":D ) describing the style of which I am a proponant.

But, to confuse the issue - I am a "user" of tapered shafts since I had D44 shafts cut and spline for my D30 diff.....but I know it's not "right" :flipoff2:

What's the point of discussion here?

Sorry, mostly wasting everyone's time by occasionally re hashing an old argument about whether "necking down" or in Starnge's language, "undercutting" an axle shaft makes it stronger or weaker.

Of course, it makes it stronger....due to flow of stress and all that....but DSI is a non-believer :flipoff2: :rasta: