: Rancho 5034's or 5036's?


Rebel GP
04-18-2002, 09:41 AM
Currently, after the flex test yesterday my Jeep is sitting at: Extended side 32", Compressed side 24", Ride height 27.5"

-with more flex to go, I figure that the extended side will prolly sit at around 35" (I have flexible shackles). Is it better to have Rancho 36" extended shocks with 21" compressed or Rancho 34" extended with 19.5 compressed for my application?

Just worried about stressing the 34"ers under full extension...

Thoughts?

edit- sorry it's a 95YJ SOA on stock leafs with AAL

Rebel GP
04-18-2002, 10:50 AM
btt

HighHooder
04-18-2002, 11:06 AM
Originally posted by Rebel GP
btt

dude, this isn't JU, don't btt a topic until it's at least on the second page:rolleyes:

Rebel GP
04-18-2002, 11:14 AM
My apologies, I just really need an answer on this one...

CJ-Jeeper
04-18-2002, 07:21 PM
The only question I can see is: Why would you not get the longer ones?

1MutCJ7
04-18-2002, 07:42 PM
Longer=Better=More flex=drive over bigger rocks=more fun=break more parts=more fun.........friggin' newbie!:nuke:

1MutCJ7
04-18-2002, 07:44 PM
Oh yeah, Rancho makes a shock other than the 9012? :D