: Land battle heats up dunes


Crowdog
05-20-2002, 10:09 PM
May 20, 2002 edition - The Christian Science Monitor

Land battle heats up dunes
By Daniel B. Wood

GLAMIS, CALIF. - When they look out across the largest sand dunes in North America, Jeneiene and Daniel Patterson see paradise. The 45-by-15-mile sprawl of granulated humps is a botanical Eden. Ironwood, smoke trees, and desert buckwheat provide a happy, if hot, habitat for flitting songbirds, darting lizards, stalking puma, and lumbering tortoises.

"This is a biological wonderland," says Mr. Patterson, a desert ecologist with theTucson, Ariz.-based Center for Biological Diversity. "It's one of the last, great bastions of habitat for endangered species in the world."

But Bob Matthews and Mark Hopkins look at these same dunes and see a different paradise – stadium-sized sand bowls skeined with trails perfect for off-road racing and motorcycle jumping, and flat areas for family camping. "This is a one-of-a-kind experience," says Mr. Matthews, an off-road vehicle enthusiast for 30 years. "It's one of the last, great places to find a roller coaster that you have control of."

Perennially at odds over the best and proper use of public land, the two views are clashing anew over the 140,000-acre Imperial Sand Dunes Recreation Area. In a move being watched by off-roaders and conservationists nationwide for clues to where the Bush administration is headed on land-use issues, federal officials want to reopen thousands of acres of dunes that had been closed just two years ago.

Under a temporary agreement between off-road clubs, the federal Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and conservation groups, a 49,000-acre area was closed off in the summer of 2000 over concern about damage to endangered plants and animals.

Environmental groups say reopening the closed section would reverse years of progress in habitat restoration. While welcoming more land to play on, all-terrain-vehicle (ATV) clubs are wary that the new policy could create curfews and vehicle limits.

"We're trying to provide balance between conservationists and recreation groups," says Roxy Trost, a spokesperson for the BLM, which regulates the area.

The dunes have become the battleground between several factions on both sides of the argument in recent years because of the growing swarms of ATVers who converge here on major holiday weekends – up to 250,000 by some estimates.Besides increased concern over habitat destruction, there are health and safety problems blamed on lack of adequate law enforcement when the crowds arrive.

On major holiday weekends, this place resembles a scene from the "Mad Max" road warrior movies. Thousands of helmeted, blackbooted riders wearing plastic body armor gun their two- three- and four-wheeled machines up, down, and around hundreds of trails. There are no traffic rules – just loose, right-of-way protocols known as "dune etiquette." Spurred by violence – such as stabbings and shootings – the BLM has asked eight federal and state agencies to help restore order.

"There have been serious, ongoing law enforcement issues since 1996 because no one has ever established the proper carrying capacity of this land," says Karen Schambach, California director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, which has been working with federal rangers to publicizes some of the law enforcement issues.

To that end, the BLM has proposed reopening areas that were closed off to ATVs in 2000.

To show visitors what's at stake if the land is reopened, Patterson takes them on a tour of the southern end of the dunes. He walks over hard plateaus of wind-rippled sand, and sinks calf-deep in near-vertical drifts. Part of the area closed off in 2000, it now includes a football-field-wide swath of green vegetation directly behind the red stakes that define the protected area. Within it grow several patches of delicate, mushroom-like plants as well as healthy patches of an endangered plant called Peirson's milkvetch.

"This green belt has appeared in little over a year since the agreement," says Patterson. "If they allow bikers in here, these plants will not survive."

Patterson and other conservationists say the presence of thousands of off-road vehicles ruins the wilderness experience for hikers who want to pursue a natural habitat free from the sounds and fumes of racing buggies. They say ATV tires tear up the sand where delicate seeds and spores take root, and they churn up the cooler sub-surfaces where endangered lizards reside. When key plants don't take root, the desert creatures that rely on them for shelter and food – like the endangered Colorado desert fringe-toed lizard – lose their habitat, they say.

"We are worried both about endangered species and the endangered experience for nature lovers and bird watchers," says Patterson.

Matthews and Hopkins tell another side of the story. ATVers on these dunes since preschool, they say the subculture of "duners" is vastly misunderstood. "Ninety percent of duners come out here and treat the desert like a home away from home," says Matthews. He and others say ATVers stick to virgin sand – where there are no plants – and go out of their way to avoid hitting lizards and other wildlife.

"Our tires are so expensive that there is no way we want to drive over a root or twig that will puncture it and strand us on the dunes," says Hopkins, president of the Orange County ATV Association.

The two sides are locked in battle over which of four BLM management options will govern the dunes. Officials are considering measures that could include curfews, quiet hours, limited ATV access, and requiring biological education certificates for drivers.

"I feel like they are always trying to limit us, control us," says Hopkins. He says he's never seen a hiker here more than 100 feet from a road. "When they have 250,000 hikers and bird watchers show up on a big weekend ... then they can ask us about closing more dunes," he says.

Right now, the dunes are divided roughly equally between acreage open to ATVs and not (about 70,000 acres each). Of the four new plans the BLM will choose from by fall, it appears that at least 20,000 acres will be re-opened for off-roaders. Because of this, Patterson says the issue is likely headed to court. "The BLM likes to pretend it is caught in the middle of this issue, but if they wanted to be fair, they would keep the current, 50/50 plan in place."

http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0520/p12s01-ussc.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Crowdog

YellowSub1962
05-20-2002, 10:40 PM
that artilce is so slanted to the left I'm surprised the words can stay on the page...:rolleyes:




:usa:

Crowdog
05-21-2002, 06:09 PM
Dear Mr. Wood,
I am writing to introduce myself and my organization, the American Sand Association. We represent over 20,000 responsible, law-abiding dune enthusiasts that take our families to the Imperial Sand Dunes Recreation Area in California. We are a non-profit, grass-roots, all volunteer organization that is fighting for public land rights.

You used the allegory to Mad Max--we take great offense in that. Responsible riders wear their safety gear for a reason--to not get hurt. That includes a helmet, chest protector, gloves, and riding boots. Wearing shorts and tennis shoes is just asking for burns, broken ankles and other injuries. Helmets are required by BLM and CA state laws. My kids don't get the keys to their quads until they are completely "decked out". There is no way I would even think of riding without at least a helmet.

The ASA, along with several other off-road organizations are locked in a heated battle with the extreme environmentalist groups headed my Mr. Patterson and Ms. Schambach. Did you know that they are also both very active members of "Earth First!" and brag of their arrest records on open forums? They and their organizations are both trying to close not only the ISDRA, but also huge portions of the California desert to all forms of outdoor recreation.

I appreciate that you tried to find some balance in your report by speaking with some long-time duners. In the future, please file us as another contact you can use when addressing this issue.

Mr. Patterson, in every interview he gives, keeps inflating the numbers of visitors. This time he must have told you 250,000, the actual numbers are far, far less than that. The BLM's own numbers, for the largest weekend were under 200,000. You may contact Mr. Steven Razo at the BLM to get the real figures that the BLM publishes, his phone number is (909) 697-5217.

Also, the BLM has started a new law enforcement program that we heartily endorse, to remove the "hooligans" who come to the ISDRA not to recreate, but to party and trash the place. It has been very effective already, according to the BLM's own press releases. If you ask around at who is there, you will find mostly families and extended families, with lots and lots of kids, enjoying each other. How many teens would do anything with their parents? An activity like this is perfect for multi-generational family bonding. I guarantee you my 6-year-old could never make a hike more than 100 yards into the dunes, his quad enables him to enjoy the beauty of an early-morning sunrise from the top of a tall dune with the rest of the family.

The real biological facts are more encouraging than Patterson would like for you to believe. The Pierson's Milkvetch isn't listed as an Endangered Species, it's officially listed as a Threatened Species. Recent scientific studies indicate that it is thriving quite well, with about the same numbers of plants in the open and closed areas and that the population of plants hasn't changed significantly one way or the other since 1977. This indicates that the closures have had no effect on the plant's livelihood--hence it can be inferred that OHV activity in the sand dunes has NO IMPACT whatsoever. The study does show that the amount of rainfall is the direct contributor to the plant's growth rate. It also varies wildly each year because of the amount of moisture--the seeds can stay dormant in the sand for many, many years. Did you know if you would have just gone 1/2 mile farther south, around the west end of that hill, you would have come upon a field of over 200 Pierson's Milkvetch thriving in the open area? Patterson made sure you didn't. The locations and census counts of all of those plants, in GPS coordinates are publicly available.

We have petitioned the Department of Interior for a de-listing of this plant from based on these studies and have filed a Notice of Intent to Sue.

The fringe-toed lizard that you mention in the article doesn't live in the ISDRA, its habitat is nearby but not in the recreation area itself. Ask the BLM--their own studies confirm it.

The "green area" that you saw has always been there. In fact, the whole dune complex is being taken over by "noxious weeds" more and more every year. The seeds are blown in from the Imperial Valley and left by birds. Comparing pictures taken 50 years ago with today plainly show more plant life in all areas, not just in the closed areas.

Patterson and Schambach also spread the story "1/2 open, 1/2 closed". This is plainly not fair nor a responsible use of public lands. Using the BLM's own numbers, 90% of the visitors to the area are there for motorized recreation (we think it's more like 99%). He also fails to mention that there is already 32,000 acres of Federal Wilderness Area that cannot be used for any mechanical (that includes bikes) or horseback exploration. Ask the BLM--this area sees little or no hikers. Why? Because it makes better "press" to hike in the closed areas? You decide.

Attached is our Press Kit. Feel free to also browse our website at http://www.americansandassociation.org

Regards,
Greg Gorman

YellowSub1962
05-21-2002, 09:48 PM
go get um Greg!!! :beer:


:usa:

Boggerdust
05-24-2002, 11:32 PM
Really great info Greg! Keep up the good fight!! We can't allow these (people) to take away OUR rights to OUR land.