: SELC Files Notice of Intent - Tellico OHV Area at Risk


kf6zpl
06-28-2007, 03:06 PM
SELC joins sportsmen, other conservationists in protecting native trout streams in Nantahala National Forest


Severe erosion of ORV trails in the Tellico Area of the Nantahala National Forest channels muddy water to nearby streams, threatening some of the last brook trout populations in the Southern Appalachians.

For generations of Southerners, the brook trout is a symbol of the region's natural bounty and plentiful outdoors recreation opportunities. The native species, which survives only in the cleanest, coldest water, is also a symbol of water quality in our mountains.

Decades of intensive logging, sprawl development and other impacts have polluted trout streams and extirpated brookies from much of their historical range. In the South, some of the last, best habitat for this fish is on public lands.

One of these areas is the upper Tellico River watershed, with headwaters in the Nantahala National Forest in Cherokee County, North Carolina; the watershed flows into the Cherokee National Forest in bordering Tennessee. For years, Tellico has been a popular destination for anglers.

It's also become one of the largest and most intensively used areas for off-road vehicle (ORV) users. The sport entails driving customized "monster" trucks, as well as smaller all-terrain vehicles through rugged terrain - the steeper the trails, the more challenging. And the more damaging to the forest floor and water quality.

Years of heavy use and erosion have turned trails in the Tellico area into massive ditches, some more than seven feet deep. In wet conditions, these ditches channel muddy water into nearby streams.

The US Forest Service has designated 40 miles of trails in the Tellico area for ORV use - twice the legal limit. This doesn't take into account the innumberable smaller illegal trails forged by ORV users. Further, in violation of federal and state law, many of these trails are within 100 feet of streams and creeks. The agency's own studies show that brook trout populations in the area and downstream in Tennessee have declined due to impacts from ORV use. Yet the agency has failed to take the necessary steps to protect and restore the trout streams.

On June 28, SELC filed a "notice of intent to sue" the agency for failing to enforce the law. We are representing Trout Unlimited, both the North Carolina and Tennessee Councils, as well as Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility and the Southern Appalachian Biodiversity Project. We are calling on the Forest Service to permanently close the most environmentally damaging trails, and seasonally close the entire system.

With ORV use growing rapidly in the South's national forests, our legal action aims to make clear to the Forest Service its responsibility to get on top of the problem now.

For additional information: http://southernstudies.org/facingsouth/2007/06/southern-sportsmen-conservationists-sue.asp

Bebe
06-28-2007, 05:01 PM
Thanks John,
I reposted this in the new Tellico section...

HANO
06-28-2007, 07:45 PM
:mad3:

I'll donate money to move the trout somewhere other than my favorite wheeling spot.....

Has SFWDA issued a response yet?

Never Monday
06-29-2007, 04:08 AM
:mad3:

I'll donate money to move the trout somewhere other than my favorite wheeling spot.....

Has SFWDA issued a response yet?

I'll issue a response.

When in this lifetime did animals become more important that humans? Last year Atlanta nearly runs dry due to muscles and some fish in the lower Chattahoochee. Now Tellico could get closed due to another fish. Just yesterday the Bald Eagle was taken off of the endangered species list. Mostly due to anti hunting laws. But also due to nature at work. The Trout will move on and find new homes. These are public land for the benefit of everyone, not just the animals. If a group want to have an animal preserve then buy the land and close it.

Pat

Never Monday
06-29-2007, 05:28 AM
That was my initial reaction, heres a more rational thought

I read this as; SELC has decided that we (ORV community) have over run their prized fishing grounds and run them off.
It appears to me, they want what they feel is their fishing areas back. I see this as regulation to the benefit of a specific group not all citizens on public lands.
From their defamatory wording in the article they are trying to paint a poor picture of what we do.

Ghost
06-29-2007, 09:23 AM
I vote we sue trout unlimited to stop fishing our public lands to rebuild the population like non hunting eagles rebuilt theirs.

Bebe
06-29-2007, 10:49 AM
I vote we sue trout unlimited to stop fishing our public lands to rebuild the population like non hunting eagles rebuilt theirs.


so is it really from sediment, or over-fishing? How do they get to their favoite fishing spos? By vehicle? or by hiking?

kibblerange
06-30-2007, 08:09 AM
There are two rivers Upper Main River (stocked) and North River (wild). Everything is accessible by vehicle.

The one that is in threat by OHV'ers is the Main River. The more popular river to fish.

edit: In the past it has "been" because of sediment, or atleast that is the only thing they have tried to prevent. But Tellico stays fawkin' packed with fishers

tech701
07-08-2007, 06:32 AM
I say we counter attack. Sue these guys for cruelty to nature. WELL GAWD DAMN........ DOES'NT CATCHING A FISH WITH A HOOK AND DRAGGING IT RUTHLESSLY OUT OF THE WATER, INTO THE AIR WHERE........IT......CAN'T.......BREATH (HELLO) HEART THE POOR BROOKIES?????????? (not screaming at you guys, just screaming)