: Comments 4-1 in favor of snowmobile ban in Yellowstone


Crowdog
06-18-2002, 04:32 PM
Comments 4-1 in favor of snowmobile ban in Yellowstone, Teton


Associated Press


WASHINGTON -- Comments received by the National Park Service on whether to ban snowmobiles from Yellowstone and Grand Teton national parks lean 4-1 in favor of an outright ban of the machines, a Park Service official said.

Joan Anzelmo, a National Park Service spokeswoman based in Grand Teton, confirmed a report Monday in Wyoming's Jackson Hole Daily Guide that of about 335,000 letters submitted to the Park Service, about 271,000 favor phasing out snowmobiles and about 62,000 favor continuing to allow snowmobile riders into the two Western parks.

However, Anzelmo discounted the number of letters as unimportant to the agency's process of writing a new rule governing snowmobile use in the parks.

"The final decision will not be about numbers. It's not about the quantity of comments," she said. "It's about new information, new data, that's being offered by the individual or the group."

Also, about 85 percent of the comments appear to be generated as form letters as part of campaigns organized by environmentalists and by allies of the snowmobile industry.

Despite the number of form letters, Anzelmo said many of those had personal notes, letters and comments attached.

So far, the public comment period on the environmental study into snowmobile use in the parks has drawn a record number of comments.

The Clinton administration had ordered an eventual ban of snowmobiles in the two parks after a decade of study.

However, when the Bush administration came into office it settled a lawsuit by putting a hold on the rule and ordering the Park Service to conduct a second environmental impact statement.

http://www.spokesmanreview.com/news-story.asp?date=061802&ID=s1169188&cat=section.regional

smurfsdad
06-18-2002, 07:24 PM
I dont buy into their data. I recently sent an email to feinstein opposing her bill to up foreign aid by 25% and got an email back thanking me for supporting her. I now copy everything to paper and the next time its going to the TV stations and newspapers to show how skewed their data is.

landusepbb
06-19-2002, 07:17 AM
The final decision will not be about numbers.

At least the feds are beginning to see thru the eco-nazi smoke screen. The first time around with the Roadless Conspiracy they "stuffed the ballot box" big time, there were literally millions of preprinted cards all saying the same damn thing. Sounds like maybe (hopefully) that tactic ain't going to work this time. I hope my earlier perception of the land designation process is starting to peek thru, looks like the feds have seen the eco-nazi responses as green nonsense.

Crowdog
06-19-2002, 07:35 AM
Originally posted by landuseorc


At least the feds are beginning to see thru the eco-nazi smoke screen. The first time around with the Roadless Conspiracy they "stuffed the ballot box" big time, there were literally millions of preprinted cards all saying the same damn thing. Sounds like maybe (hopefully) that tactic ain't going to work this time. I hope my earlier perception of the land designation process is starting to peek thru, looks like the feds have seen the eco-nazi responses as green nonsense.

Brad, that's what the ASA has been told in regards to the RAMP comments for ISDRA. Quality of comment, not quantity.

Jon

landusepbb
06-19-2002, 07:51 AM
Originally posted by Crowdog


Brad, that's what the ASA has been told in regards to the RAMP comments for ISDRA. Quality of comment, not quantity.

Jon

Jon, we can only hope!

From Brad, the burned out eternal optimist!:D

LAME
06-25-2002, 06:33 AM
I don't see why it is such an issue. Yellowstone is a parking lot compared to what it was 10-15 years ago:(