: *****alert Jean Area Closure - Help Needed!!!*****


GlamisGurlie
07-13-2008, 01:43 PM
It is being proposed by the Solar Energy Industry to install panels on Knight Ranch road where our pit area is. They are wanting to shutdown approx. 6000 acres in this valley. This will completly close down OHV use in this area. In addition to this proposal they are proposing to close off approx. 280,000 acres throughout the Las Vegas District.

We have until Tuesday July 15 to place public comments and try and stop this from happening. I went to the BLM office yesterday and found out this information. I strongly suggest and insist that ALL MRAN, SNORE, SCORE, BITD, CODE, VORRA, BORE, MORE, MDR members submit a comment objecting to this proposal and request that if this area is closed the BLM be required to reestablish and equal size area with the same miles of trails in another area in their district within close proximity to Las Vegas. This new area would be in addition to any remaining OHV areas (Nellis Dunes).


Here is the link to comment http://solareis.anl.gov/involve/comments/


Here is my comment to them:


To Whom It May Concern:

I have been living in the Las Vegas area for five years. My family and I chose to come to this area due to the abundant off-road recreational activities available to us at the time. Over the past few years, we have noticed a very unfair situation taking place here in the Vegas area regarding land closures. As the Vegas Valley has grown immensly, the growth has been taking chunks of land we used for OHV recreation at an astonishing rate. We have been whittled down recreating in two areas, Jean/Primm and Nellis Dunes, for off-highway recreation. And now you are proposing taking one of the remaining two areas away for solar power development.

I am all for renewable/alternative energy sources, but there many other areas that can be utilized for this purpose. Why do you always go after the OHV areas? There are 2 million people living here in Las Vegas and OHV use is at the top of the list for families to participate in. You cannot keep taking OUR land away and funnel us like a herd of cattle into parcels of small acreage! It is unsafe and unhealthy! There is no reason to take OUR (the OHV) land away to use for the proposed solar plant. None whatsoever. We are tax payers and this is OUR land. You must allow a percentage of land to be available for us to recreate on - you can't just keep taking it and not giving anything back. There are hundreds of thousands of acres of desert available for this type of project that would be just as suitable.

This closure would impact an already devestated economy. There are 5 sanctioning bodies that utilize the land proposed for the solar plant to hold sanctioned events on. These events bolster not only the local Vegas economy, but as many participants come from the California and Arizona areas to enjoy the desert in the Jean/Primm area in this arena, if it is closed to OHV use, it would greatly impact all of the businesses that are tied to our sport. It is a ripple effect and one that I just can't see justified. You must give our families a place to recreate and this place needs to stay as the Jean/Primm area.

Thank you.

mikevyota
07-13-2008, 04:39 PM
Comment left!

LadyRed
07-13-2008, 05:07 PM
Done :smokin:

Spotter's Wife
07-13-2008, 06:51 PM
done!

navy-jeepster
07-13-2008, 10:37 PM
done

bob91yj
07-14-2008, 05:41 AM
Done!:mad3:

nineinchyj
07-14-2008, 06:30 AM
Done!

Kurtuleas
07-14-2008, 08:24 AM
Let me double check on this with John Stewart from Cal4, but this is a "Programmatic" EIS.

I *think* that means that it is the Impact Statement to see if an entire project should start, it's not site specific. I would think that another EIS would have to be fabbed up for each specific site.

In English, this is PEIS is being done to see if they should start the entire project, it may be better to fight for the specific in the Jean Area, which will have it's own public comment period.

This is the scoping period, so you should still send comments in and go to the meetings, but there will be more ways to fight this down the road that may be more effective.

silvrzuki77
07-14-2008, 08:36 AM
Comment left.

Roaring Rory
07-14-2008, 09:12 AM
Done

XJ_ranger
07-14-2008, 11:35 AM
comment left -

Hello and good day,

I am an avid off road enthusiast utilizing public lands for OHV recreation at least 2 weekends a month, and as such am concerned that the proposed projects could affect the ever shrinking legal areas for me to use my 4x4. I urge the planning committee of this project to take the needs of the current users of these public lands into account while reviewing the project, and the losses of legal recreation area for the OHV community.

Thank you.

-Bryan J Bennett

Jason M
07-14-2008, 01:00 PM
done

Bebe
07-14-2008, 01:42 PM
Dear Sirs,

Thank you for allowing us an opportunity to comment on this PEIS.

OHV use is quickly being targeted throughout this great country. For some reason, it appears that all of these "Projects" are being set up by the BLM to use OHV areas, as the prime locations for military, wind, solar, and geothermal projects.

Is it just me? Please ask the BLM to communicate with all of its offices, and stop taking OHV areas for "the greater" good of society. There's plenty of other land for that!

:shaking:

YJ_WOLF95
07-14-2008, 05:05 PM
Done!

Roc Doc
07-14-2008, 05:55 PM
Thanks for posting this.

Comments posted.

bob91yj
07-14-2008, 07:02 PM
The comment tracking number that has been assigned to your comment is SOLARS50292.
Comment Submitted:
My family and I travel to Nevada several times a year from the San Diego, CA area . The purpose of our visits are desert racing.
Closure of the Jean area without a one for one land exchange is unacceptable to the off road community.
Closure is not "management" and never will be.
If Nevada is attempting to eliminate visitors other than gamblers to their state, public land closure is a good start!

RedBullJeep
07-14-2008, 11:08 PM
SOLARS50470

Only a couple hundred posts in the last few hours...it's time to rally the troops before time is up!

Sluice Sally
07-14-2008, 11:55 PM
Done SOLARS50473

cruzila
07-15-2008, 08:09 AM
Comment Date: July 15, 2008 10:08:49AM CDT
Solar Energy Development PEIS
Draft Programmatic EIS Comment: SOLARS50491

SBChero
07-15-2008, 09:19 AM
done. hope its not too late.

MCAGCC
07-15-2008, 10:02 AM
Rally the Troops, before someone sells them out again!

The comment tracking number that has been assigned to your comment is SOLARS50526.

Pook
07-15-2008, 10:03 AM
Done.

Kurtuleas
07-15-2008, 10:12 AM
done. hope its not too late.

No...it's not to late.

This is a PEIS

It is NOT site specific for this area, it is the Impact statement for the ENTIRE PROJECT.

The Jean Area will have it's own impact statement and it's own public comment periods. You will have another chance to comment then, with a better chance of stopping it or making sure it does not close land.

You should still respond to this PEIS and ask that motorized recreation is addressed in the entire project, but comments that are site specific will be set aside as "non-issue"

Please read this post on how to make a substantive comment:

http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=694804

ROF-Admin
07-16-2008, 07:39 AM
Done!!!

Halogrinder
07-16-2008, 06:49 PM
done