Torch2815
08-26-2008, 12:08 AM
So here's what I'm wondering... I have read that for my rig (88 runner, sas,37's etc...) I should have a rear shackle angle of 45 degrees.Which is what my truck was set at. This gave me insane droop and up travel but with no sway bars front and rear it was quite the basket case on the highway...But when I loaded it with all my trail and camping gear plus the family it looked like a dog scratching it's butt on the carpet. ( i have 63" Chevy leafs (3pack) with the overload in rear)
So this being said I have adjusted the shackle angle to 77 degrees (empty truck) and the handling has improved drastically, although I havent loaded it to the tits yet... I did take it out to flex it and I can no longer stuff the rear tires into the fenders with the truck empty but I'm sure it will be close once a few hundred pounds of trail supplies are added.
I am trying to find the balance between wheelability and driveability. I live in western Canada and the roads are hilly and wet and far from straight so It has to be OK on the road.
I am wondering if anyone else has gone through similar situations...or am I specia l:homer: ???
The front still flexes like mad but doesn't seem to effect the handling as much...:flipoff2:
So this being said I have adjusted the shackle angle to 77 degrees (empty truck) and the handling has improved drastically, although I havent loaded it to the tits yet... I did take it out to flex it and I can no longer stuff the rear tires into the fenders with the truck empty but I'm sure it will be close once a few hundred pounds of trail supplies are added.
I am trying to find the balance between wheelability and driveability. I live in western Canada and the roads are hilly and wet and far from straight so It has to be OK on the road.
I am wondering if anyone else has gone through similar situations...or am I specia l:homer: ???
The front still flexes like mad but doesn't seem to effect the handling as much...:flipoff2: