davez71
11-18-2008, 05:02 PM
I just got an email with a Christmas suggestion for the wife! :D It's supposed to be CA state legal? What do you think?
Sorry if its a repost.
http://blog.riflegear.com/archive/2007/12/26/hello-kitty-ar-15---evil-black-rifle-meets-cute-and.aspx
Meet Hell Kitten
http://www.riflegear.com/blogimages/KittyRifle.jpg
Edit: I suck at the linky...
D_JEEPER
11-18-2008, 05:19 PM
wtf i up with that grip?!
animator
11-18-2008, 05:21 PM
wtf i up with that grip?!
california.
sem1845
11-18-2008, 05:21 PM
apparently pistol grips kill more people in Kalifornia... i believe this is a repost of a repost of a repost
82toycrawler
11-18-2008, 05:40 PM
That would be the mega man monster grip. Makes it so it is no longer an "assault weapon."
Now it is safe to use.
Aces'n'8s
11-18-2008, 05:48 PM
Sad thing is given are current panic buying fiasco, that carbine would likely sell for $1000.
:flipoff2:
Drunk tank
11-18-2008, 06:04 PM
couldnt you just get ride of the bayonet lug and put a normal pistol grip on it????
909K5
11-18-2008, 06:09 PM
couldnt you just get ride of the bayonet lug and put a normal pistol grip on it????
bayonet lugs have never been evil in Kalifornia, it's the dreaded pistol grip.
ROCKILLER
11-18-2008, 06:17 PM
couldnt you just get ride of the bayonet lug and put a normal pistol grip on it????
Pistol grip in CA means you cant have bigger than ten round mags in it and they must not be "detachable"
Scott@Rockstomper
11-18-2008, 07:24 PM
So if that's a muzzle brake and not a flash hider, that would be an example of a "no evil features" rifle that can use a pre-ban normal-capacity detachable mag, correct?
Triaged
11-18-2008, 07:32 PM
So if that's a muzzle brake and not a flash hider, that would be an example of a "no evil features" rifle that can use a pre-ban normal-capacity detachable mag, correct?As long as you possessed those mags in CA before 2000 then yes.
sem1845
11-18-2008, 07:58 PM
As long as you possessed those mags in CA before 2000 then yes.
would it be up to you to prove you had those before 2000 or for the prosecution to prove that you acquired them after 2000?
Numidian
11-18-2008, 08:04 PM
would it be up to you to prove you had those before 2000 or for the prosecution to prove that you acquired them after 2000?
In theory the prosecution would have to prove it... That whole innocent until proven guilty, although it seems more and more that being a gun owner makes you guilty before proven innocent :shaking: