: center for bio-divers B/S


rockwrangler
09-07-2002, 08:47 AM
Fire in the Forest

Fire is a natural and vital component of most western forest ecosystems. In the dry forest types, such as ponderosa pine, fire was historically present as a frequent, low-intensity disturbance. Fire is necessary for the health of the forests, and the forests have evolved to depend on fires to clean out underbrush and maintain biological diversity. Dead trees serve as important wildlife habitat and contribute to the nutrient cycle, and patches of dead trees allow for forest succession. Even stand-replacing fires have historically occurred at some level in almost every forest type in the West. Unfortunately, the fires of this year and the past several years have been burning large areas with relatively high severity, as well as burning into communities.

Past Management

The vast majority of western dry forests are at risk of large, high-intensity fire because of the effects of management over the past 100 years. The primary factors that lead to the current forest conditions include logging large trees, fire suppression, and livestock grazing. Since the beginning of the 20th century all three of these factors have been present in our forests, and all continue today.

Logging operations have historically removed the largest trees. Unfortunately, large trees (especially ponderosa pine) are fairly well adapted to fire, and are able to withstand low-intensity fires. On the other hand, the young trees that replace the cut trees are relatively highly susceptible to fire, and serve as fire ladders, allowing the fire to reach up into the canopy of the forest.

Historically, low-intensity surface fires would burn regularly throughout the forest, killing many of the young, small, fire-susceptible trees. However, fire suppression efforts over the past century have been greatly successful, and have effectively removed fire as a thinning agent from most forests. Because of this, many small trees that would have been killed by fire have been allowed to survive, and currently fill many forests at high density. Besides being prone to fire, these small trees are present at such high densities that they are growing slowly due to the intense competition.

The relatively frequent and low-intensity surface fires that historically burned in many forests, were carried primarily by ground vegetation such as grasses. However, livestock grazing on our public lands has severely reduced the amount of grasses, and fires are now able to burn only when there is significant build up of woody debris, often leading to severe fires. Furthermore, by shading the ground, grasses would suppress the growth of tree seedlings at the youngest stages. With grasses reduced or cropped short by livestock, tree seedlings are much more likely to survive, growing at extremely high densities, and extending into meadows and grasslands.

These factors are mentioned here not for the purposes of placing blame, because it is impossible to undo the damage done to our forests over the past 100 years. However, it is important to acknowledge the causes of the problem so that we may work to remove these factors entirely from our public lands. We can not protect and restore our forests, unless we stop the activities that continue to degrade them.

Protecting and Restoring

The Center for Biological Diversity has three main goals for dealing with fire in our forests:

1) To provide wildland-urban interface communities with protection from the threat of forest fire.

2) To reduce the severity of forest fires within the forest, and reintroduce fire as a natural component of the ecosystem.

3) To set the forest on a trajectory toward recovery by reintroducing and enhancing the range of natural forest ecosystem processes.

Fortunately, there is significant overlap among these three goals and the methods required to achieve them. Also, these goals can be obtained with a minimum of controversy and delay.

Priorities

Our highest priorities include protecting lives and houses in the communities that are currently at risk from forest fires (more information). At the same time, it is critical to protect areas of special concern, such as municipal reservoirs, and habitat for sensitive species. Once those efforts are under way, the greater long-term task of restoring the forest at large must begin.

Small Trees

All of the methods used to achieve these goals must focus on reducing the number of small trees, and protecting the remaining large trees. Small trees make up the greatest portion of the trees in the forest, and comprise the vast majority of the fires risk to communities and the forest. In the Southwest, approximately 90% of the trees in the forest are smaller than 12 inches in diameter.

Forest Restoration
Work within the wildland forest (away from communities) has two main objectives: 1) to mitigate the immediate fire threat to the forest, and 2) to restore the forest ecosystem so that natural processes, such as fire, may be reintroduced at the landscape scale and over the long-term.

The Natural Processes Restoration approach proposes a conservative approach to restoration, implementing treatments that preserve the greatest amount of the present biological diversity while restoring ecosystem integrity. Treatments include fuels reduction to protect the forest from stand-replacing, high-intensity forest fires while it is recovering and developing natural ecosystem processes.

These guidelines attempt to set in motion the processes to allow the forest to recover from ecological degradation. The Natural Processes Restoration approach has been developed by the Center for Biological Diversity and the Southwest Forest Alliance, and so far has been implemented in experimental plots on the Gila and Kaibab National Forests in New Mexico and Arizona.

Specific goals of the Natural Processes Restoration Approach include:

Restoring the ecological integrity of the forest, including the full complement of composition, structure, and function.
Increasing ecosystem resilience to disturbance events, including fire, drought, insect infestation, and climate change.
Restoring the natural distribution of tree ages, sizes, and spatial structures.
Reducing the potential for large, high-intensity crown fires.
Encouraging the development of a diverse understory community.
Enhancing habitat for imperiled and sensitive species.
Decreasing excessive tree competition to protect and invigorate old growth trees and encourage the development of old growth structure.
Minimizing the risks and negative effects of forest restoration.
The end result is a forest with a diversity of structure at multiple scales. Such treatments will increase the diversity of the forest while increasing its ability to sustain a frequent fire regime.

Thinning efforts should focus entirely on the small trees that make up the vast majority of the fire risk in the forest. Approximately 90% of the trees in the Southwest are smaller than 12 inches in diameter. Large and old trees are relatively fire-resistant, and are extremely rare after 100 years of logging in the forests. For these reasons, it is important to protect and preserve the large trees that are largely deficient in the forest, and remove much of the small trees that are found in high densities. At the same time, it is critical to remove the factors that have lead to the degradation of the forest ecosystems, such as logging large trees, livestock grazing, and fire suppression. It is impossible to protect and restore our forests unless we stop the activities that continue to degrade them.



These factors are mentioned here not for the purposes of placing blame,

I CALL BULL SHIT ON THIS!!! Thay are just trying to get out of the spot light that has been placed apon them for all the preventive fire work that thay have stoped by law suites and other means!!!
Most of the things listed here to help stop or reduce fires have been stoped by there law suits and injunctions, when ever the
forest service trys to do this work.
We have tryed forest managment there way and look whats happened our forest's are burning down! Even the old growth trees are burnning and nothing is left .
We need to support the up comming bills for better forest managment !

Crowdog
09-09-2002, 09:09 PM
Here's another one from them CBD.....

Salamander may stymie project

Cotati multi-use site faces new legal challenge
September 7, 2002

By TOM CHORNEAU
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

A much-discussed office and residential project in Cotati faces a new legal challenge from environmentalists who believe the 35-acre development will threaten protected salamanders.


The challenge comes even though federal biologists responsible for safeguarding the tiger salamander in Sonoma County are not convinced the $54 million project of Monahan Pacific Development poses any threat to the amphibian.


First proposed in May 2000, the project received all necessary permits from federal, state and local officials in the spring of 2001. Subsequently, much of the site was cleared and graded, including areas once believed to be salamander breeding grounds.


Still, attorneys from the Center for Biodiversity, based in Berkeley, argue that Monahan and government regulators must reconsider the construction plan in light of the July listing by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service of the tiger salamander as an endangered species.


"They didn't grade the entire site," said Kassie Siegel, staff attorney for the center. "It is our position that there are still salamanders on the property and any further development activities will be a violation of the Endangered Species Act."


Tom Monahan, president of the San Rafael-based development firm, said the environmental group's legal threats are misguided.


"I think it is extremely unfair," Monahan said. "We've been practically the poster child for what the environmental community has been asking to be done in these situations. We've done everything we've been asked to do."


The issue comes forward as the Fish and Wildlife Service prepares to hold public meetings in Santa Rosa in coming weeks regarding the emergency protections adopted in July. A workshop will be held on the issue Sept. 24 and a public hearing is set for Oct. 1.


Regulators want public comment on the protections already in place and on plans to make them permanent.


So far, the listing has not generated much interest, according to a spokesman at Fish and Wildlife.


Most of the areas considered to be prime tiger salamander habitat are located in the south Santa Rosa plain, where there are already a number of flowers and plants that have received protections under the Endangered Species Act. Because the tiger salamander's habitat corresponds to that of the protected flowers, most landowners initially said they did not see the salamander's listing as a major event.


But a group of building and farming interests has coalesced around the issue in recent weeks, led by the Home Builders Association of Northern California and the Sonoma County Farm Bureau. Representatives of the coalition say they intend to challenge the federal listing, arguing that there is strong biological evidence that the creature is thriving in the county and does not need federal protection.


Coalition members are also watching events related to Monahan's South Sonoma Business Park and how the federal listing might affect other development plans.


The project was originally to be anchored by Finnish cellular phone giant Nokia Corp., which planned to locate its global headquarters at the office campus.


With more than a half-million square feet in office space, retail outlets and town homes, the business park was expected to generate 2,500 jobs and $1 million in annual tax revenue for the city.


The size and scale of the project, however, also attracted strong opposition from many residents who worried the development would overwhelm Cotati's small-town character.


Already facing concerns about the project's impact on local traffic and sewer and water capacity, Monahan also learned early on that the project would cause the destruction of 3.5 acres of federally protected wetlands.


Of most concern at the time were endangered plants living in and around the wetlands. While there were indications that tiger salamanders might also exist on the site, the creature was not then a protected species.


Under an agreement worked out with the state's Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Monahan spent about $1 million to establish a permanent wetlands preserve at another location and relocated protected species from the construction site.


Meanwhile, Fish and Wildlife adopted emergency protections for the salamander in Sonoma County in July. Federal biologists specifically said at the time that Monahan's office project was not considered a threat to the salamander and instead identified the general march of urban development from southwest Santa Rosa as the trigger for the listing.


Jim Nickles, spokesman for Fish and Wildlife, said this week that the department's opinion of the Monahan project has not changed, although officials continue to review new material.


Susan Barnes, a consultant for Monahan, pointed out that the areas identified by the environmentalists as being salamander breeding ponds were graded and destroyed long ago under permits from the state and the U.S. Army Corps.


Siegel, however, said that because the salamander burrows deep into the ground during the summer months, the habitat is still undisturbed.


"The entire property is some of the best remaining habitat for the salamander in the entire county," she said. "It includes several breeding pools that are active even now."


Charlie Carson, executive director of the Home Builders Association, said there is strong scientific evidence that the tiger salamander is thriving in Sonoma County and does not need to be protected.


Carson said a consulting firm hired by the group opposing the listing has found more than 500 potential breeding ponds on the Santa Rosa plain. Biologists for Fish and Wildlife say they know of only seven significant breeding sites in the southwest Santa Rosa area, which they believe are all at risk from urban development.


You can reach Staff Writer Tom Chorneau at 521-5214 or tchorneau@pressdemocrat.com.

http://www.pressdemocrat.com/local/news/07salamander_b1.html