landybehr
09-10-2009, 03:22 PM
Hi,
a very big european magazine has tested a lot of different waxes and greases with which the car and itīs cavities can be protected against rust.
There were some "rules of thumb" which may be useful:
- a wax is suitable for new, smooth, not so much rusted surfaces.
- a wax relies on a solvent to aid the "diffusion" into corners etc. But once the solvent is gone, generally it will not "be active" any more. Cracks can be attacked by water again, f.e.
- waxes seem to differ a lot! by the amount of solvent. The test-boxes had been weighted and there were some which only were 4gr heavier than without any application. The best waxes were around 50gr. This, given all of them were applied by the same technique. Thumb of rules says the more the better.
- waxes are very easy to use.
- a good "brand" is no guarantee for good result. (Waxoil is ok (first place after the waxes), Fluid film too - but both "2k", Dinol is fine too. Holts is ok, and some more I cannot remember.
- all the first places were taken by the greases. The one that came out second was the MikeSanders (first by a margin was a professional system which cost a lot).
- the grease is a bit cumbersome to apply because it has to be heated to water boiling point to get it liquid and through a special air gun (the one which applies pressure to the bottle rather than a venturi-system).
- the grease will "wake up" when it getīs warm and start to crawl into rust. (Edit: I have smeared it to the backside of my RRC lower tailgate 1/2 year ago and now it managed to cover 1-2" of "travel" on the visual face of the tailgate. So over the time the grease will get to places not first coverd. That way it can "heal" defects of itīs coverage by time again - very contrary to wax.
- grease has slight difficulties to stick to smooth surfaces, it tends to slide off. Thatīs why waxes are ok for newish steel surfaces.
a very big european magazine has tested a lot of different waxes and greases with which the car and itīs cavities can be protected against rust.
There were some "rules of thumb" which may be useful:
- a wax is suitable for new, smooth, not so much rusted surfaces.
- a wax relies on a solvent to aid the "diffusion" into corners etc. But once the solvent is gone, generally it will not "be active" any more. Cracks can be attacked by water again, f.e.
- waxes seem to differ a lot! by the amount of solvent. The test-boxes had been weighted and there were some which only were 4gr heavier than without any application. The best waxes were around 50gr. This, given all of them were applied by the same technique. Thumb of rules says the more the better.
- waxes are very easy to use.
- a good "brand" is no guarantee for good result. (Waxoil is ok (first place after the waxes), Fluid film too - but both "2k", Dinol is fine too. Holts is ok, and some more I cannot remember.
- all the first places were taken by the greases. The one that came out second was the MikeSanders (first by a margin was a professional system which cost a lot).
- the grease is a bit cumbersome to apply because it has to be heated to water boiling point to get it liquid and through a special air gun (the one which applies pressure to the bottle rather than a venturi-system).
- the grease will "wake up" when it getīs warm and start to crawl into rust. (Edit: I have smeared it to the backside of my RRC lower tailgate 1/2 year ago and now it managed to cover 1-2" of "travel" on the visual face of the tailgate. So over the time the grease will get to places not first coverd. That way it can "heal" defects of itīs coverage by time again - very contrary to wax.
- grease has slight difficulties to stick to smooth surfaces, it tends to slide off. Thatīs why waxes are ok for newish steel surfaces.