![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read | Premium Memberships | Auto Loans |
![]() |
|
|
Share |
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Member # 16582
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 1,281
|
One of the guys from WMS runs a 14B front end, but that solid axle. Why would you want to waste all that time and money on an IFS when you could just as easily do a SAS? Even then, unless you have the access to parts and machinery, why even try to make a 14B front?
__________________
'81 Chevy - 350/TH400/T-136-27/Rockwells/16.00R20 Michelin XZLs/Wheel brakes |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
Take if from someone who went from IFS to s SFA....IFS sucks more cock than all the sororities in this country combined. If you think a 14 bolt centersection would look cool as an IFS front dif, this about how much cooler it would looke as a SFA diff. by the way why do you need something that big in the front?
__________________
99' ZR2 Blazer, SFA 79' F250 Dana 44 with chevy outers, 4.88's detroit, 14 bolt FF, 4.88's, detroit, 3.5" YJ springs in front, customs in rear, 36" TSL's |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
IFS does have potential- look at hummers, it has to be really tough, but if it is then it can be good. but i say SFA is generally better.
__________________
78 Blazer 11.5" lift, 39" mickeys, crate 350, ~345hp, 14ff rear, 4.88s, 1 ton rear driveshaft. . . whoopdee freaking doo!. . . |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2002
Member # 11585
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 0
|
I hate it when people compare IS (independant suspension) to HMMWV (Pronounce "Hum-vee") suspension. There is no production vehicle with a suspension like the HMMWV's suspension. Comparing HMMWV suspension to ANY other IFS rig is like comparing the bark on a tree to the bark of a dog.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|