![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Member # 106752
Posts: 5
|
AAM/Dodge interchange with GM/Corporate 14B
Will the AAM Torsen locker, out of an AAM/Dodge 10.5" (like the '04- Power Wagon) function in the GM/Corporate 14 bolt? I know the pinion is set up different in the Dodge 10.5 (no pilot bearing), but does that affect the function (location) of the carrier?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Addicted to Gear Oil
Join Date: Oct 2005
Member # 56050
Location: Oahu, Hawaii
Posts: 4,878
|
Paging Gearman...
I would think that, no it would not work. The venerable GM 10.5" 14 bolt (with 6 bolt pinion support) is a completely different axle than the AAM 10.5" used in Dodges. BTW the first year for the "new" Power Wagon was 2005
__________________
1965 Scout 80 7.3PSD/ZF/203/205 D60F/14BFF Member: 4 Jackstand Wheeler's Association Quote:
David H. Petraeus for President 2016 |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Member # 40312
Location: Gonzales, TX/ Puyallup, WA
Posts: 778
|
*bump*
I'm curious as well. Randy's Ring and Pinion website shows that the carrier assembly has ALL the same specs; axle diameter, splines, ring gear bolts, thread etc...
__________________
2003/Ram1350/5.7L/545RF/D60/Spartan/S10.5/Detroit/5.13 2006/F250/6.8L/ZFS6-650/D60/S10.5/LSD/4.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Devout Newbie Hater
|
I would think that the pinion offset would be something to look at, as well as ring gear offset...
__________________
sympathy, empathy and apathy... i dont know which one is which.... But i know you can find sympathy between shit and syphilis in the dictionary. Win this car for a whole BUCK! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Devout Newbie Hater
|
__________________
sympathy, empathy and apathy... i dont know which one is which.... But i know you can find sympathy between shit and syphilis in the dictionary. Win this car for a whole BUCK! Last edited by Grumpy_old_fart; 10-10-2008 at 06:42 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Devout Newbie Hater
|
Quote:
if you share parts from one to the next, does the value of your product go up or down? GM learned with the small block that commonality of parts is vital for mass production.... but also figured out that by changing the parts slowly over a few years, that the parts (while interchangeable) would not gain in value a great deal... Ford, on the other hand, learned that if you make 4 engine families, and made many changes within each family, you can make MORE money
__________________
sympathy, empathy and apathy... i dont know which one is which.... But i know you can find sympathy between shit and syphilis in the dictionary. Win this car for a whole BUCK! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
be cool, baby
Join Date: Mar 2003
Member # 17896
Location: tooele UT
Posts: 3,058
|
What you say is true.... I'm just literally curious what is the same-- bearings?
Ford can fawk right off with that shit. I once had a 460 in an M725, which promptly blew up. Imagine my Chevy-based surprise when I had to find that same year engine due to retarded, but important changes. Interchange rules, and GM's losing money in spades anyway.
__________________
Utah 4-Wheel Drive Association---Blue Ribbon Coalition---USA-ALL---Tread Lightly |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Member # 40312
Location: Gonzales, TX/ Puyallup, WA
Posts: 778
|
Quote:
__________________
2003/Ram1350/5.7L/545RF/D60/Spartan/S10.5/Detroit/5.13 2006/F250/6.8L/ZFS6-650/D60/S10.5/LSD/4.10 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|