![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read | Premium Memberships | Auto Loans |
![]() |
|
|
Share |
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Wheeler
Join Date: Apr 2009
Member # 133568
Location: Ontario
Posts: 313
|
inboarding opinion wanted
trying to decide on how to mount my rear 63" springs on my 3500HD frame and looking for opinions... The truck will eventually be lisenced for road use so I don't want something which will be unstable.
Option 1: keep the factory front spring hanger relocated forwarde then use washers to center the new 2.5" wide 63" spring inside the stock 3" hanger opening, then I would build a shackle flip rear hanger to match the front width. This will also allow me to keep the factory 40.5" perch width on my 14ff. Option 2: inboard my springs under the frame with simple custom mounts welded below the frame and then weld new perches on my 14ff to match the new width. This will give me a rear spring width of approx 30.5" which I figure is too narrow?? Last edited by Leyland; 03-24-2010 at 05:47 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Member # 51243
Location: Tropical Paradise
Posts: 3,410
|
What is your ultimate purpose for this truck? Hardcore offroad or weekend warrior that doubles as a DD?
Inboarding enables more flex. Keeping an outboarded spring provides more stability on the road. I run my springs outboarded just like they came from the factory, and I have stupid flex as is.
__________________
[COLOR="Lime"][B]1999 Chevy K3500, 5.7/4L80E/14FF/stock/stock/stock[/B][/COLOR] |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Wheeler
Join Date: Apr 2009
Member # 133568
Location: Ontario
Posts: 313
|
Not a DD, mostly off roading but will see some black top.
I just want opinions if 30.5" c/c between leaf springs is too narrow if I decided to inboard?? how wide is a typical 73-87 1/2 ton frame? 1 ton frames are different again but I dont' know how much |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Rock God
Join Date: Sep 2009
Member # 142394
Location: Do or die bed stuy brooklyn
Posts: 2,422
|
I went the inboard route but its super tight when you try to add a traction bar.I did it becauxse i cut my frame after the tranny and im running rectangle tubing.
If you have a stock frame then id keep them outboard..The flex from 63's is nucking futts. I will be adding a sway bar of some sorts. I have a factory one but may just run a spline d unit from stock car products.
__________________
Unfortunately there is no end to human stupidity -- making things foolproof only creates more ingenious fools |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Wheeler
Join Date: Apr 2009
Member # 133568
Location: Ontario
Posts: 313
|
Think I'm going to keep my springs outboarded for now and use the stock front hangers. I picked up some 3.5x3.5 (1/4" wall) tubing this morning and will hopefully get started building the shackle flip this weekend but first I need to strip the frame and shorten it by 48" (to approx 115" WB)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Sticks and Stones
Join Date: Jun 2008
Member # 115122
Location: Southern, MO
Posts: 932
|
Whats your perch width? Im thinking about going 32" to match my front. Id like to get close to the flex of 64" springs with 52s to keep a "slightly better" departure angle...
__________________
Piss on everything I'm going four wheelin! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Devout Newbie Hater
|
FRAME widths are the same between 1 ton and 1/2 and 3/4 ton.
spring mount widths are different on 1 tons. 1 tons are narrower by 2 inches on the rear ONLY. one inch on each side. inboarding provides MUCH more flex, as the axle has more leverage on the spring. I would leave the springs where they are, and tune them to your application. Its not hard to do, just take a little time. its a whole lot easier than moving mounts.
__________________
sympathy, empathy and apathy... i dont know which one is which.... But i know you can find sympathy between shit and syphilis in the dictionary. Win this car for a whole BUCK! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Granite Guru
Join Date: Sep 2004
Member # 35786
Location: Carbondale, CO
Posts: 815
|
Don't inboard them.
Yeah, inboarding the springs might seem like a good idea because it adds more flex and all but it really isn't. Plenty of flex doesn't mean anything if your rig is unstable.
__________________
We specialize in full size Chevy parts but if you need steering, transfer case gearing, suspension etc. for just about anything give us a call! chrish@offroaddesign.com offroaddesign.com 970-945-7777 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Wheeler
Join Date: Apr 2009
Member # 133568
Location: Ontario
Posts: 313
|
Thanks for your opinion, after much research I agree with you, expecially with the rig being lisenced for road use. I just wanted to see what others have done and try to get a feeling for what is the narrowest anyone "should" go when inboarding.
I have since started working on my leaf spring mounts and decided NOT to inboard them. If interested, you can follow the thread below in my sig for details to see what I'm doing. Cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Member # 80500
Location: horseheads, ny
Posts: 148
|
the 1ton frame on 73-87 is actualy the same width as 1/2 and 3/4 tons. its the frame hangers for the springs. thay are 1" shorter deepth on the spacing outward.
and 42.5" on 1/2 ton and 3/4 ton center pin to center pin and 40.5" on 1 ton center pin to center pin. i think 30" would be super skinny and real tipsy . wouldnt leave you much room for a anti wrap bar mount .
__________________
if you can't play nice then STFU. Don't get pissed & go flaming someone cause you SUCK ! |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Sticks and Stones
Join Date: Jun 2008
Member # 115122
Location: Southern, MO
Posts: 932
|
Inboarding shocks can cause unstable onroad characteristics and inboarding spring does the same. What if you outboard your shocks to compensate for your springs. Seems like it would have some what of an opposing effect...
like this []/--||---||--\[] instead of []-||-|---|-||-[] || =leafs /,|,\,=shocks [] = tires Sorry my cellphone CAD is weak.
__________________
Piss on everything I'm going four wheelin! |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Karnage
Join Date: Oct 2005
Member # 55444
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 7,968
|
I've never seen the need to inboard my 64s. 8" eye to eye shackle leaned about 60*, with the spring as flat as possibly within reason. They'll flex far more than your truck is capable of where they are. Just tune the shackle hanger when you do the shackle flip to allow the spring to be flatter at rid height.
__________________
Thanks to BAILEIGH INDUSTRIAL
![]() Krush RT IFS/IRS Thanks to Epic Polymer Fox Kustoms Inc Pathmaker Productions[/color] https://www.facebook.com/KrushRacing |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Member # 84343
Location: ohio
Posts: 124
|
My 63's are inboarded and my shocks are outboarded with a 33 inch frame width, []/ ll ll \[] Mine seems pretty stable, but I'm also running a ladder bar. Before the 63's I had 56's in stock location, that worked great too. I guess it just depends on what the trucks main use will be, and what works for you. Thats just my 2 cents.
__________________
:flipoff2: |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|