![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read | Premium Memberships | Auto Loans |
![]() |
|
|
Share |
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Member # 159220
Posts: 13
|
Link Setup on my Ranger
Hi guys, So ive got a '97 ranger that used to have a rough country 6" setup on it, and recently I decided to go to tons. Dana 60 front/rear. The rear is all set with leafs, but for the front end I am still a little undecided. I recently have done quite a bit of research on 3 link wishbone setups, but in the past have always thought about going with a triangulated 4 link. The truck will be setup for the rocks, rolling on ~37" tires. Can someone give me some insight on what would be better for my application? I know its kind of a broad question, but I am pretty new to all of this. The front axle is out of a 2005 f250 if that helps any. Thanks a ton!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
party wagon
Join Date: Nov 2011
Member # 202878
Location: jojah
Posts: 2,225
|
well if you havent already cut off the factory radius arm brackets then you need to start with a radius arm setup.
trust me, if you havent researched suspension design and handling characteristics then its not going to perform worth a fuck. and if you think a RA setup is inferior to a 3 or 4 link then you might want to check out cousin willard (offroad designs truck) youll be much happier with the effort put into the front suspension if you go with a RA setup than you would if you "tried" a 3 or 4 link...
__________________
jeep is getting a new home! NEW PROJECT ON THE HORIZON!!! E-350 12 valve cummins, 2006 F350 axles, 6" lift and 37's ... |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Wheeler
Join Date: Jul 2010
Member # 165077
Location: Howard City, MI
Posts: 410
|
A 4 trangulated link would require a hyro steering or something like that...keep that in mind.
Just do some research, I can't tell you what would work best for you.
__________________
93 RANGER 4D'S/V8/TONS |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
crawler
Join Date: Sep 2010
Member # 167647
Location: Roseville California
Posts: 295
|
the radius arms or 3 link is gonna be your best bet. but if you dont know much about link setups then you could setup some leaves that could perform well.
__________________
1989 f-150 dana 60 front, 10.25 rear. 3 link with coil overs out front. chevy 63s double shackled out back. bobbed bed. rollin on 37s the build up of ^ truck /forum/ford/1015047-project-89-f-150-a.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
party wagon
Join Date: Nov 2011
Member # 202878
Location: jojah
Posts: 2,225
|
Quote:
__________________
jeep is getting a new home! NEW PROJECT ON THE HORIZON!!! E-350 12 valve cummins, 2006 F350 axles, 6" lift and 37's ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Member # 159220
Posts: 13
|
Alright, Thank you! I have been looking into doing a radius arm setup slightly. Or even possibly a 4 link setup that was made for the f250, but just the arms. But just the arms. I am going to keep an open mind, and go with whatever ends up being easiest, but best in the long run. I just dont want to have to go back through it all and re-doing it later on.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|