![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read | Premium Memberships | Auto Loans |
![]() |
|
|
Share |
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Granite Guru
Join Date: Sep 2009
Member # 141697
Location: Great White North aka BC Canada
Posts: 523
|
302 cam swap question
ok i have been searching and have been getting lots of mixed answers so want to ask here for some help
helping a friend do a motor swap in his 92 f150, truck has a roller 302 in it stock. we used a good block from a 90 and it was non rolller. he put in comp cams 35-512-8 http://www.compcams.com/Company/CC/c...csid=1446&sb=0 with new lifters and so on. no this cam swaps the firring order to a 302ho/351 order and truck runs once we changed to the new firring order what i want to know is will there be any problems with the fuel injetors firring in the right order to match the new plug firring order. have really been getting mixed answers on this. some say its fine the way it is and others say you have to change the injetor plugs around what say pirate |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Hardcore Web Wheeler
Join Date: Nov 2007
Member # 102426
Location: Denver
Posts: 989
|
Depends on what PCM and harness you have. IIRC most of the early F-150 stuff is bank fired (not sure what year that changed). So I don't see why it would matter.
Now if you had something like a sequential Mustang PCM in it, you'd have issues.
__________________
The Answer to 1984 is 1776 Last edited by Whitetrash303; 08-04-2012 at 11:44 PM. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
IDIot
|
what he said ^^^
Also, did you get new valve springs, or push rods?
__________________
Rats get fat, while brave men die. Spare parts? If you're shooting your weapon to failure, it means you're really good to have stayed alive through that much combat. You're not fucked, You're just down a weapon, go get another off of one of the many dead bodies you created |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
Mass air didn't come till after 95 or so in the trucks, so its bank fire, so you're good to go. Thats pretty early for a roller block in a truck, thought they didn't come till mass air came in, sure it wasn't swapped (honesty thats the first 92' I've ever heard of with a roller block)?
__________________
90' C350 AKA 4 door 1 ton Bronco 96' Ranger: kings, EMF parts, 800hp SBF |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Member # 127442
Location: Pinckney MI
Posts: 779
|
Ive got a 94 thats a roller block, from what i read only the 95/96 was roller but apparently not.
__________________
[CENTER]95 Ranger 5.0L Built 4R70W 203-205 D-60 14B 3 link front 14'' kings 250lb-400lb 63"chevys detroit rear powertrac front 37' creepy crawlers. Build thread here[URL="http://pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=878737"]http://pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=878737[/URL] [B]Support the BRC![/B][/CENTER] |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
can divide by 0
Join Date: Oct 2007
Member # 101654
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 331
|
302 cam swap question
The 351 was roller ready in 94, 302s were roller ready much earlier. Don't know when they actually came roller stock in trucks. MAF is 95+ but not every truck got it.
__________________
Ford with tires and wheels and shit... |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Granite Guru
Join Date: Sep 2009
Member # 141697
Location: Great White North aka BC Canada
Posts: 523
|
yes the stock 92 block is a roller block but not a HO and is not mass air flow as its speed density.
so what everyone is saying is that on a sd controlled motor its bank fire injectors? if that is the case then my friend should be fine if we just change the plug firring order and leave the injectors alone. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|