![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read | Premium Memberships | Auto Loans |
![]() |
|
|
Share |
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Member # 35803
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 166
|
n00b question about 8.8
Well the time has come to ditch the dana 35 and put in somethin a little beefier. This is a DD so full widths will hafta wait til later so I am putting in an 8.8 from an older bronco. I've got everything lined up for it, gears, flange adapter, longer wheel studs etc. Heres the noob question:
What does it take to convert the drums on this axle to discs? I want to reuse the stock rotors and calipers from my 35 onto the 8.8. I've seen it done before but I do not recall what all it involved. Thanks for any advice.
__________________
www.mallcrawlin.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
__________________
QUOTE=TheHawes;15027873 If it wasn't for pussy, I'd hunt them fucking things. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Rock God
Join Date: Mar 2003
Member # 18283
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,285
|
from the sounds of it you're looking at buying an axle that the guy says is from a bronco II claiming it's an 8.8, ImNotRight is correct in that the 8.8 has an extremely limited availibility and most likely if it is truly from a bronco II then it's a 7.5 the other possibility is that it is from an explorer and then it is an 8.8 and would good. Though if you want rear disc brakes using existing calipers then ask the guys in the jeep forum about 8.8 swap and your calipers. Otherwise look for a late model explorer rear already equipped with disc brakes.
__________________
There are no rules. You have to think! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
Ummmm, the 8.8 might've been swapped into the BII, if it came out of an explorer (31 spline), or a ranger (28 spline), ORRR, the full width 8.8's would be in the full size vehicles.
If it was a true 8.8 in a BII, like I said, it probably was out of a explorer or ranger, because those are direct swaps, except for maybe relocating leaf spring mounts if it was an explorer because they are SUA. These two options will also be narrower. Brian
__________________
1996 S10 blazer 31x10.5x15 Daily driver Currently web wheeling |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Member # 10063
Location: So.Calif (San Fernando Valley)
Posts: 1,757
|
This deal sounds much too questionable to risk it. NO Bronco II came with an 8.8", as NO Bronco II came with a factory 4.0L either. There are tons of rumors about this regarding the '90, but none has proven true.
As for an 8.8" with discs, Explorer axles from '95-'01 are what you are looking for.
__________________
'90 Bronco II, 2.9L, Dual T-case, 5.13s, 35x12.50s [url]http://www.cardomain.com/ride/702959[/url] |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
winch operator
|
nope. i had the frame and other parts from trenton public schools b2 that was used as a plow truck and it had a 4.0 and d35 in it. the rear end was a 7.5 though. they could not sell it complete because it was not a complete vehicle or something. (ford prototype iirc) it got twisted up on something and the front frame rails got a lil twisted and fawked up the plow mount. worked out tits for me. n still got alot of shit from it on my truck.
__________________
if only 88 ranger ext cab pos hackjob powered by a 6.5 diesel clattering against a 4l80 thats punishing a f208 that is turning ford 60's rolling on 33-44 in tires depending on the mission at hand how ya like me now??
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|