![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read | Premium Memberships | Auto Loans |
![]() |
|
|
Share |
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Rock God
Join Date: Sep 2002
Member # 13707
Location: California
Posts: 1,922
|
300 inline dimensions
How big is the 300 compared to a 302? Will the 300 fit in a bronco II? What bolt pattern is the bellhousing (will an AOD bolt to it)?
Correct me if I am wrong, but: the 300 will have a better torque curve(espcecially with an auto) for crawling. It should get better milage than a 302 for normal driving. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Member # 54152
Location: Rapid City,South Dakota
Posts: 889
|
The 302 will have better gas milage and more horse power and the 300/6 will have more tourke and less gas milage and also weighs more.I would use the 300/6 for crawling due to longevity and tourke.And if you have an aod with a small block bell pattern than it will bolt to a 300/6.It should fit in a B2.
__________________
2008 F250 CC SB Lariat 4x4. 700HP on fuel. 93 F150. 01 F350. 97 Ram 1500. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Wheeler
Join Date: Aug 2004
Member # 34702
Posts: 485
|
the 300 is going to be a bit of a challenge in a b2, check out this explorer 302 conversion:http://www.explorerforum.com/forums/...37#post1113937
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Member # 41557
Location: Frederick CO
Posts: 534
|
Heres a quote from Wanderer(he did it in a ranger):
I used an EFI so the firewall was cut to fit and a doghouse built like Vans use..but a carb'd 6 with the radiator moved 2in forward would fit without too much trouble...it was sweet!!..torque MONSTER!!! and easy to work on..tons of room to the sides.. I used the stock ranger mounts..ground the guide pin off the pass side..drilled out the stock I6 mounts and dropped it in...little hammering on the oil pan and firewall top then it fit like a glove..another buddy of mine did it with a carb'd 6 but discovered when he started moving the firewall back with a hammer that rust had eaten the body off his truck..so he scrapped the body and found a deal on another truck with a good motor... I did the 4.9 M5od 1356 and everything but the t-case shifter lined up to the ranger body..I had to chop into the floor to make an access hole for the t-case..but no big deal there...
__________________
Ron Douglas of: [URL="http://www.OverlandJourney.com"]OverlandJourney.com[/URL] [URL="http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=623057"]Official Cummins Suburban Expedition Build.[/URL] Cummins/6speed/HP 60 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Member # 66772
Location: Ellensburg, Washington
Posts: 6
|
My dad has a 302 and I have a 300-6 I get way better gas milage than he dose. I've also have a manual though. If you were to get the manual 4 speed with granny low then I would consider it but with a manual I don't know.
__________________
73' Ford F-150 short box, 92' Dodge Dakota |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Member # 17313
Location: Tower, MN
Posts: 2,794
|
efi 6's are a goofy motor... some make decent power, some are gutless..
Some get ok mileage, some get shitty mileage.. and there seems to be no connection between the power and mileage. I've had two in my F-250, the first had "ok" power, the second is a dog, both had similar mileage, around 15-16 or so. However, I've seen ALOT more that get around the 10mpg mark than the 20 mark.. Where as a old 1bbl motor makes a solid upper teens in WORST case scenerio in my expirances.. The old 1bbl ones always seemed to have more power too.. As for the size, I think your alot better off just doing a 302, or even better, a 351W. The 302 fits in a BII just soooo nice, and the power/weight balance on them is reallly nice. I still miss mine..
__________________
A recent survay of over 1000 trailer parks in the southeast found the 350 chevy out numbered the mullet by nearly 4:1, draw your own conclusion. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Rock God
Join Date: Sep 2002
Member # 13707
Location: California
Posts: 1,922
|
Well, I am back to thinking I will get a fullsize bronco. From what I have read and researched the 351w will be the better choice.
Do you think an injected 351w stroked to 393(AOD) will get 15 mpg on the freeway? |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Member # 17313
Location: Tower, MN
Posts: 2,794
|
Quote:
its all in the tune.. and whats around the motor... and whats in it..
__________________
A recent survay of over 1000 trailer parks in the southeast found the 350 chevy out numbered the mullet by nearly 4:1, draw your own conclusion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Member # 41653
Location: Newark Ohio
Posts: 1,467
|
Quote:
__________________
Gotta Love people who have "soon to have/be" in their signatures....Im soon to be thin,rich and nice.. yea right.. "They are little angels but they are trying to fuck the wings off each other!" --Sturgell Black eyes last but a week, the shame of sodomy lasts a lifetime.-TheRedHorseman |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|