![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Rock God
Join Date: Oct 2005
Member # 56456
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,581
|
How to Efi 460?
I have got a gt 390 in my 74' f100 and am looking into converting it into a fuel inj. 460. What exactly do I need? All the sensors wiring harness and a computer? I was reading up on this fuel injectuion stuff and its pretty confusing. Say I wanted to p[ump up the motor a bit, would the computer be able to "handle" that power or would the gains be inadequate? Do you reprogram the computers or what?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
You have several options. First would be drop in a complete EFI 460 out of an '88-97 F-250/350. Go for post '93 if you can, they have better flowing heads and the heads have more potential. If you do that you'd want the motor, ALL the engine related wiring and the ECM. If you know what your doing these motors have a fairly tuneable computer, although you do have to 'hack' into it using Tweecer or a similar computer system to tune it. Once you have the ability to reprogram the computer, you can basically do anything you want as far as mods go, so long as you avoid cams with a lot of overlap.
The next option, would be to get a non-fuel injected 460 and get an aftermarket injection system to run it. This might be a little more user freindly as far as tuneing goes, but I've never messed with aftermarket EFI, so I don't really know. The last option would to be get a non-injected 460, and piece together your own injection system. If you get thrifty, I've even seen guys using chevrolet TBI systems atop 460's, since you can find those systems for a dime a dozen in JY's, and the are more easily tuneable. Thats probably the route that I'm going to go for EFI on my GT-40 windsor motor, mostly because I have a TBI setup laying around.
__________________
Kickin' it old school: '79 Ford, Q78 TSLs and a Q-jet |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
BSW
Join Date: Feb 2005
Member # 42436
Location: Norcal
Posts: 2,064
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
How do you plan to wheel the truck? If its mostly for crawling, I would go with a built windsor. Punch it out to 427ci, aluminum heads and intake and you have a good torquey motor that is much lighter than a big-block. If its just a general all around wheeling truck or for mud/snow/dune type wheeling then I'd go with a big-block. Cheaper to get the same power numbers if weight is not a concern.
The windsor is the route that I'm personally going with my '79 F-150. I have a 351w that I'm building up using GT-40 heads. For now I'm probably going to run it with the stock displacement, but plans are to eventually stroke it to 427ci. Fuel injection will be via Chevy TBI, as I stated before. As much as I love the big-block in my F-250, I just can't see it working out to well in a truck built for crawling, too much front end weight. Edit: As far as torque needed for crawling, its sort of a moot point with the crawl ratios that most people are running today. A 400lb-ft small block (which if your thrifty can be built fairly ecconomically), will have more than enough torque for 95% of crawling situations. True the torque will have to come on a little higher in the rpm range to get those numbers, but with gearing it really doesn't matter IMO. Now if your talking Tellico style wheeling, having more power on tap is nice; big tires and big motors are always fun there.
__________________
Kickin' it old school: '79 Ford, Q78 TSLs and a Q-jet Last edited by VerticalTRX; 04-04-2006 at 09:34 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Member # 69301
Posts: 27
|
engine mods
If you want to use a stock engine, use all the stock system that comes with the engine. Ford sells a stand alone wiring harness for the 302/351. Available from Summit for around $250. I am currently doing a 460 stroker motor (545) and will use the stock Ford everything but changing injectors adding a mass airflow meter and using a Mustang 302 computer. Look on the computer search: mass airflow conversion. Lots of info and instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Member # 52979
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 239
|
Im putting a 95 F350 460 EFI motor in my 67' F350 and debated also but ended up getting a donor truck for all the stuff... the heads are different also so now my problem is they dont make frame exit headers for the older trucks that fit the EFI heads so custom headers... thought about using an 85' F350 motor, sitting in the garage also
and use the FAST system then you need the crank trigger, special distributor mods etc..etc.. alot more cost.. Then I really didnt want the carb injection wanted the throttle body so went with the 95' stocker. I will be driving in the snow and ice so dont want some insane motor although it is tempting so now Ill be at close to 400hp or so? I also looked into the mustang throttle body on it with mustang ECM using the tweecer to set which looked do able? See the below link, alot of Tech there.http://www.network54.com/Forum/85220/ Todd Last edited by zakt; 04-05-2006 at 10:21 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Member # 18324
Location: Visalia CA.
Posts: 275
|
Quote:
I found a set of good used L&Ls for a hundred bucks and bought some 1/2 flanges for the newer heads when I get the time I will cut the old and weld on the new. The tube spacing and bolt pattern is the same between the old and new heads the ports are raised 5/8in and are more D shaped on the newer heads . Leadmic Last edited by leadmic; 04-05-2006 at 10:35 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Member # 18324
Location: Visalia CA.
Posts: 275
|
Quote:
I have an E40d but havent decided on which t-case. I have a 1356 and a 4407 But both of which will give fitment problems with thease narrow frame trucks. They have too much offset for the front drive shaft and the side of the t-case will hit the frame on the drivers side. I was going to use a 205 but they dont have enough off set and the front drive shaft yoke will hit the corner of the transmission case at the pan flange. I thought about doing a 203-205 doubler but I really dont need it as this truck is going to be used for towing. Leadmic Last edited by leadmic; 04-05-2006 at 01:25 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Member # 52979
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 239
|
Its like 1200.00 or so for a custom set of headers but my truck is a money pit so no matter to me just when it gets done...I had the same problem with the T-case but bought the clock ring from below and solves the BW1356 fitment problem between the rails.. although I have a 12" lift on mine anyway though.
http://www.race-dezert.com/forum/showthread.php?t=7804 http://www.attitudeperformance.com/reindex%20kit.htm
Last edited by zakt; 04-05-2006 at 01:44 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Member # 18324
Location: Visalia CA.
Posts: 275
|
[QUOTE=zakt]Its like 1200.00 or so for a custom set of headers but my truck is a money pit so no matter to me just when it gets done...I had the same problem with the T-case but bought the clock ring from below and solves the BW1356 fitment problem between the rails.. although I have a 12" lift on mine anyway though.
1200.00 Thats more than my budget will allow. How bad did your t-case hit? Im only going a 4in lift and dont want to clock it very far if I dont haft to. I havent mocked it up yet but when I ues the tape it looks like I have about 2in too much t-case.Leadmic |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Member # 54152
Location: Rapid City,South Dakota
Posts: 889
|
Cut the frame a little where the T case hits.A buddy of mine did that and it works like a champ,and no frame weakness problems either.
__________________
2008 F250 CC SB Lariat 4x4. 700HP on fuel. 93 F150. 01 F350. 97 Ram 1500. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
I have been accumilating the parts to swap in an 89 EFI 460 in my wifes 78 Bronco. Glad you guys are working the bugs out and finding some answers to many of my questions. Currently it has the C-6/ 205 drivetrain but after I finish the EFI swap and have it running good I want to swap in an E4OD and the 1356. Didn't think it was going to be a problem fitting between the frame rails but hadn't made any measurements yet. Her Bronco is more of a daily driver with 6" lift and 38" swampers.
__________________
Favorite Quote originally by JR "It'll rub out" 71 Bronco 8 inches lift, 38" Boggers, 4.88's, Detroit, warmed over 351W, NP 435 78 Bronco, 6 inches lift, 38" TSL SX's, 4.10's, ARB rear, TrueTrac front, EFI 460, and C-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
I EFI'd my 400 and I love it even more now than when it had a carb. I would definatly do it all over again. If your putting in a EFI 460 the only way to do it is with mass air. speed denisity is good, but mass air is far better.
__________________
408ci SEFI, 70mm throttle body, 90mm mass air, stang harness, tweecer R/T waiting on a home. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Member # 52979
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 239
|
I havent measured any thing exactly yet but know the BW1356 wont fit by looking so not sure by how much? As above though I have 12" lift and clocking the transfer case 20 degrees drops it 6 inches, so that will work in my case. I most likely will be converting my 95' motor to Mass Air, when I put the vortec supercharger on they say I cant run higher boost with out converting
IST makes a conversion kit which I want to use then you have to use a stand alone transmission control which I plan to use the PCS controller. The E40D shifts could be better in my opinion so midas well fix that while Im at it.http://www.mass-air.com/Products.htm http://www.powertraincontrolsolution...content-4.html Last edited by zakt; 04-06-2006 at 07:34 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Member # 18324
Location: Visalia CA.
Posts: 275
|
Quote:
Leadmic Last edited by leadmic; 04-06-2006 at 11:46 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Member # 18324
Location: Visalia CA.
Posts: 275
|
Quote:
Leadmic Last edited by leadmic; 04-06-2006 at 11:56 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Member # 18324
Location: Visalia CA.
Posts: 275
|
Quote:
Thanks Leadmic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Member # 54152
Location: Rapid City,South Dakota
Posts: 889
|
I dont have pics sorry.But he used a NP 208 wich is similar in sise.You know hoy the frame is shaped like this. [ the bottom of the frame that runs like this - he cut a little out for the clearence and it worked out fine.If you cut more than you need you can allways weld a plate to the side of frame for more support.
__________________
2008 F250 CC SB Lariat 4x4. 700HP on fuel. 93 F150. 01 F350. 97 Ram 1500. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Member # 52979
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 239
|
Isnt the NP208 a fulltime 4x4 case?
Leadmic, is the SCTuner like the Tweecer? I also have the 95' truck or would have gotten the 97' with mass air http://www.tweecer.com/products.htm Last edited by zakt; 04-06-2006 at 12:56 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Member # 18324
Location: Visalia CA.
Posts: 275
|
Quote:
Also the 208 was the first aluminum case chain drive Ford used. Siminular to the 1356 just not as strong and had more problems. Leadmic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
A quick note on the Ford Mass air EFI 460, from all my sources and from what I have seen, these setups were only availible in '97, in CA. The are very hard to find, and those who know what it is want a nice coin for them.
__________________
Kickin' it old school: '79 Ford, Q78 TSLs and a Q-jet |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|