![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read | Premium Memberships | Auto Loans |
![]() |
|
|
Share |
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2001
Member # 6957
Posts: 4,250
|
Powerstroke questions
Not a Ford guy and have a family of Chevy guys but am looking at trucks and seeing lots of Fords that I like. I have heard from my Chevy family that the Powerstroke had problems and it was either the 6.0 or 7.3.
I am sure that there may be some truth to this as anytime a new motor comes out there is always some issue. So what years was there problems and what should I be on the look out for. I am looking at trucks around the 2004-2007 range. The one in particular is an 2005 with 7.3. Also what kind of life do these motors have. Not been around diesels alot. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2001
Member # 6957
Posts: 4,250
|
Quote:
Sorry my bad was looking at a couple trucks its an 02. So what else is a truck of this eras weak points? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Member # 85771
Location: Minnachoada
Posts: 2,033
|
Quote:
thier spelling sucks unit bearings trannys ball joints hubs
__________________
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2001
Member # 6957
Posts: 4,250
|
Quote:
I want power lots of it. I don't know what I'll tow but someday wanna tow a travel trailer, would like to tow like equipment like skidsteers or dump trailers. Would like to jump onto the freeway loaded down with 10k in tow and not stress about the assholes who wont move the fawk over
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
Trans, turbo, they r kinda expensive to mod, not as expensive as a gasser but still. Your lookin at 400 horse to move that load fast. Thats about 10-15k if u do ur own work and shop around. Thats just the engine though, trans if its auto will run 4k, manual is about 2-3k.
__________________
1996 F350 7.3L |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2001
Member # 6957
Posts: 4,250
|
Quote:
![]() Or just drive like an asshole ![]() I see a 7.3 is about 250 horses is that about correct? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Cactus Farmer
Join Date: Sep 2010
Member # 168243
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 1,571
|
Quote:
If you wanna spend the coin on a new truck, I really don't think you can lose whichever brand you go with, they all have awesome power nowadays. Trucks have come so far in power and tow ratings in the last few years it is ridiculous. Only downside I see to owning the Chevy is that you don't get a decent 4x4 setup in the front, but the duramax/allison combo is good. The new Ford 6.7 looks pretty promising and a few of the Ford techs on here have had nothing bad to say about them yet.
__________________
-Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Member # 45530
Posts: 1,317
|
Quote:
or go with a 2011 6.7 that puts out 400 hp... apples to apples man |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Member # 127442
Location: Pinckney MI
Posts: 779
|
If you want big power on the cheap you want a 12v then...
__________________
[CENTER]95 Ranger 5.0L Built 4R70W 203-205 D-60 14B 3 link front 14'' kings 250lb-400lb 63"chevys detroit rear powertrac front 37' creepy crawlers. Build thread here[URL="http://pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=878737"]http://pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=878737[/URL] [B]Support the BRC![/B][/CENTER] |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Ford Bigot
Join Date: May 2004
Member # 31227
Location: Campbell, CA
Posts: 1,486
|
Big power on the cheap is a 6.4L. Period. Otherwise they are a pain in the ass, but if you want to make 500 RWHP for less than $1500 in mods, it's the truck to do it in.
__________________
Quote:
Project Flat F***er (Fender) Project SR5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2001
Member # 6957
Posts: 4,250
|
Quote:
I'd love an 2011 but at 40k its not in the budget. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Member # 127442
Location: Pinckney MI
Posts: 779
|
first year 6.0 had lots of problems egr failure head gaskets failure to name a few. Ive never heard much good about the 6.4 either other then you can make big power for cheap but its not gonna last very long though. My brothers diesel shop has 6.4's commin in all the time with crankshaft isssues
Like stated before stick with a 7.3 last year for them was 03.5 there great motors our 7.3 has 150,000 on it has had chip intake and exhaust from day one and is not babied tranny is still sold also
__________________
[CENTER]95 Ranger 5.0L Built 4R70W 203-205 D-60 14B 3 link front 14'' kings 250lb-400lb 63"chevys detroit rear powertrac front 37' creepy crawlers. Build thread here[URL="http://pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=878737"]http://pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=878737[/URL] [B]Support the BRC![/B][/CENTER] |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Member # 127442
Location: Pinckney MI
Posts: 779
|
If you want big power on the cheap and still be reliable then it IS a cummins period.
__________________
[CENTER]95 Ranger 5.0L Built 4R70W 203-205 D-60 14B 3 link front 14'' kings 250lb-400lb 63"chevys detroit rear powertrac front 37' creepy crawlers. Build thread here[URL="http://pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=878737"]http://pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=878737[/URL] [B]Support the BRC![/B][/CENTER] |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
Just a story i thought ya'll would find interesting. My two cents on the Duramax/allison... its crap, as are all the new diesels, just cause of the emmissions crap, and the marketing behind them. Chevy couldnt make a diesel engine/truck worth its weight in compost if they tried, which is why they farmed their engine out to Izuzu (who stole their engine designs from american companies...)... (off the soapbox now)
__________________
1996 F350 7.3L |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Member # 127442
Location: Pinckney MI
Posts: 779
|
Ya but how much money did it take to make that 940 hp? Im a ford guy all the way but cummins is a better motor all around. Think about it no one puts a power stroke in a dodge or a duramax in a dodge theres reasons cummins are the motor of choice.
I will also agree that banks is overrated there shits junk IMHO. And i will also agree about the duramax/allison.
__________________
[CENTER]95 Ranger 5.0L Built 4R70W 203-205 D-60 14B 3 link front 14'' kings 250lb-400lb 63"chevys detroit rear powertrac front 37' creepy crawlers. Build thread here[URL="http://pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=878737"]http://pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=878737[/URL] [B]Support the BRC![/B][/CENTER] |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Member # 91662
Location: las vegas nv
Posts: 555
|
People swap the 12V Cummins because it's 3 wires and a fuel line to make it run. The 7.3 Ford is a complex, HEUI injection system that requires an ECU, IDM and multiple sensors to run. AND, no one makes a stand alone harness for a the swap( like the newer common rail 24V's). If a SAH did exist, you'd see some 7.3's being swapped in alot more vehicles.
Don't get me wrong, the Cummins is a great engine and I've seen more than a few with 600k miles on them. They also have problems, like everything else as well( killer dowel pin, "53" block problems, etc..). But any truck that get the shit kicked out of it daily without maintence is going to give you problems. OP, any 7.3 or 5.9 Cummins that's been taken care of will suit you fine. 400hp is easy and reasonable. Above that it gets pricey. And why do you need to tow 15k lbs at 80mph? When I tow my 6k trail rig/trailer with my 97' F-250 PSD at 70mph, I get 13mpg. When I slow to 65mph, mileage picks up to 15mpg and I get to where I'm going 10 minutes later.
__________________
82' Yota Truggy, 97 F250 CC PSD, 79' Bronco ---DesertRunner Fabrication--- |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) |
|
Wheeler
Join Date: Mar 2008
Member # 110063
Location: Benton City Washington
Posts: 233
|
Powerstrokes
In my opinion the only option for buying a Powerstroke is the 7.3, doesn't matter whether it's the 1st or 2nd gen. The 2nd gen powerstroke is already intercooled though, so keep that in mind.
If your planning on actually using the truck and pulling with power mods, go with the 6 speed unless you want to dump 4 grand in an auto to make it live. I'm not saying there aren't auto's out there with high miles, but they are the exception not the rule. The superduty's ride better and have bigger cabs, but I prefer the looks of the old body style, so cosmetics are up to you. They have never made a reliable year of 6.0, they got a little better in the later years of production, but they still suck. They couldn't fix all the design flaws that were built into that engine so they finally scrapped it and the 6.4 was born. The 6.4's are a decent engine but it takes a dpf delete and a good tune to make them pass a fuel station. I've seen a few with crank issues too, but they seem to be few a far between. The 6.7 is doing good so far, but the lack of a manual trans and the 50,000 dollar price tag ensures that I will never own one. Go with the 7.3 put an intake on it, open up the exhaust, put a good custom tune on it and it will drag 10,000 lbs around like it's not back there. And those mods won't cost you more than about 1,000 dollars if you do the work yourself. Just my .02 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|