dana 60 r&P - Pirate4x4.Com : 4x4 and Off-Road Forum
 
Pirate4x4.Com : 4x4 and Off-Road Forum  

Go Back   Pirate4x4.Com : 4x4 and Off-Road Forum > Brand Specific Tech > Ford
Notices

Reply
 
Share Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-15-2011, 10:08 AM   #1 (permalink)
Always Busted
 
Stranger ranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Member # 99058
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 753
Send a message via AIM to Stranger ranger
dana 60 r&P

Prob should put this in newb section but its Tuesday so I'm safe

Before prime wheeling season hits I'm gonna attempt to install my first set of gears in the old 60's. Shouldn't be too bad with some help from a buddy who is semi-knowledgeable in installing them. My only question is this, when buying the gear sets, (its a reverse cut standard 79 ford 60), do I need to buy the think gear set for the front and standard thin for the back or do both need to be thick? I read the bible, and went back this morning and skimmed through it to see what it requires but I couldn't find my answer, I prob just missed it, didn't have time to look at every word on both pages. I know the front needs the thick set but what about the back? Spiders are welded front and rear so I dont have to worry about buying lockers down the road and getting screwed up with the wrong locker for the type of gears I have. I wanna run 5.13's also and want to make sure I can without changing carriers, from what I got from the bible, I dont have to.
Stranger ranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2011, 11:01 AM   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Member # 15263
Location: Winterpeg, Canada
Posts: 2,048
Send a message via ICQ to 82F100SWB Send a message via AIM to 82F100SWB Send a message via MSN to 82F100SWB Send a message via Yahoo to 82F100SWB
To do it without changing carriers you'll be needing thick for front and rear, assuming your current ratio is 4.10 or less, provided that you can get standard rotation thicks in 5.13, you may have to change carriers if there is no availability.
__________________
96 F350 XL CC PSD/5 speed 4x4... New Tow pig in the making
96 F250 XLT Ex Cab PSD/5 speed 4x4... DD/Tow Pig
92 W250 LE, CTD/5 speed 4x4, tow pig/DD/snow pushin pig
86 F250... 460/T19/1345/D60/welded 10.25, 44 Boggers, reg cab, some junk... [URL="http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=853402&highlight="]Build[/URL]
82F100SWB is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 03-15-2011, 01:18 PM   #3 (permalink)
Always Busted
 
Stranger ranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Member # 99058
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 753
Send a message via AIM to Stranger ranger
yep, both ratios are the stock 4.10's. My only concern was that I knew it needed the thick gearset on the front RC axle, but I wasnt sure about the rear.
Stranger ranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2011, 04:52 PM   #4 (permalink)
Granite Guru
 
73 ford guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Member # 54530
Location: Victoria b.c
Posts: 745
Yes you have to run thick gears for both unless the carrier is for 4:56 and up but if it's a stock carrier it won't be and it will be 4:10 and down. That is the carrier break for these axles. The difference of offset between the two carriers is 3/16. I know thus from tech from randys ring and pinion. So with that said there "is" a possibility to run a thin regular gear with a ring gear spacer. I think trans dapt sells one but alot will advise it's not ideal but if you torque the crap out if the ring gear bolts with red lock tite it should be fine. I am curious if anyone has had a real world failure not I heard once my brothers uncles friend kinda crap if there was a failure do to a spacer...
__________________
73 F-250 44's,428,twin sticked 205,60 fr,70 rear,ARB/Detroit,crossover high steer/hydro assist,winches
73 ford guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2011, 05:47 AM   #5 (permalink)
Always Busted
 
Stranger ranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Member # 99058
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 753
Send a message via AIM to Stranger ranger
why would it be beneficial to run the thin gears and a spacer? Are the thinner gear sets naturally cheaper?
Stranger ranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2011, 06:20 AM   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Member # 101581
Location: Richmond, KY
Posts: 318
Send a message via MSN to duncanstives
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stranger ranger View Post
why would it be beneficial to run the thin gears and a spacer? Are the thinner gear sets naturally cheaper?
I think people are saying kit may be difficult to find a that ratio for your axle in a thick cut gear. If you cant find one you may have to go with a spacer.
duncanstives is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2011, 06:47 AM   #7 (permalink)
Granite Guru
 
73 ford guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Member # 54530
Location: Victoria b.c
Posts: 745
It's nit beneficial to run a spacer it's just a solution if you have a 5:13 thin gear and again nit always the best solution. 5:13 thick gears are NOT hard to find either . Go to randys ring and pinion and it has a "T" in front of the part # for thick. There's a few brands available.
__________________
73 F-250 44's,428,twin sticked 205,60 fr,70 rear,ARB/Detroit,crossover high steer/hydro assist,winches
73 ford guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2011, 07:13 AM   #8 (permalink)
Always Busted
 
Stranger ranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Member # 99058
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 753
Send a message via AIM to Stranger ranger
I didnt think it was hard to find, but thats good to know i have a solution IF thats the ratio i went with.
Stranger ranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.