![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read | Premium Memberships | Auto Loans |
![]() |
|
|
Share |
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Member # 32039
Posts: 110
|
R&P change and weird problem
I was swapping out the front and rear R&P to 4.56 this past week and found a problem with my front Dana 30. It seems that the old carrier was using shim packs for the backlash. I used the old bearings as setup bearings and after installing the R&P and getting the correct tooth pattern and preload, I found that the shims on the carrier were good to go for backlash. I pulled the setup bearings off and pressed the new bearings on.
Carrier would not fit into the housing and was visibly WAY OFF from the inner housing cups. Long story short is I had to remove ALL of the shims on the carrier, used a deadlblow, and only was able to get .0065 - .007 for backlash. I called Motive and they could not understand why the problem. Anyone know why the old bearings and shims fit and the new ones were tighter than a frogs ass without shims? Very weird. Thanks! I should note that the new bearings came in the Motive "Master Kit". Last edited by pityocamptes; 10-23-2007 at 02:56 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Member # 70148
Location: Neodesha, KS, but now in da U.P. of MI eh?
Posts: 2,521
|
Do bearings wear? Is that possible?
__________________
I don't pay nothing for anything. [url]http://pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=598612[/url] |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Member # 90212
Location: NM
Posts: 347
|
you got the right carrier right? there is a case break after 3.73's
edit I just read your whole post real good. sounds like bearing wear to me
__________________
"This truck is probably going to end up like a retarded kid. You wanna get rid of it but in your heart you know you'll have to keep it." Last edited by stomp-a-jeep; 10-23-2007 at 03:04 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Member # 32039
Posts: 110
|
Quote:
Yes, I made sure of that. I had to buy one for the rear D44 but the front did not need it since it was 3.73. The guy from Motive said it wouldn't really make a difference as the carriers are the same size. What chaps my ass is that the setup bearings and shims fit perfect into the housing with a deadblow. Yet, once I pulled the setups off and pressed the new bearings it wouldn't freakin fit. You could see a huge overlap from the outer race to the inner housing cup - God wouldn't have been able to get that bastard in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Member # 32039
Posts: 110
|
Quote:
OK, guess I'll have to yank the carrier out tomorow night - can I get an AMEN on how big of a pain in the ass changing R&P is? I guess when you don't do it often it can take some time... ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Wheeler
Join Date: Feb 2005
Member # 43634
Posts: 112
|
I've set up a few R&Ps and never experienced anything like this. When the bearing is pressed on does it look to be the same distance from the "rest" of the carrier as the setup bearings? If not, did one of the shims get folded and crushed when the bearing was put on.
I'd also take a micrometer and measure the setup bearing with the race, front to back, and compare it to the new bearing front to back. Is it possible the wrong bearing was put in the master kit? Can you cross reference the new bearing number to the old? Just some thoughts. Brett
__________________
'75 cabtop 392 T-19w Klune-V (David) LoMax-NP205 D60 14-bolt 5.13s ARBs '77 cabtop 392 T-19w STAK 3-spd w/OD (soon) D44 2.72s ARBs |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Wheeler
Join Date: Feb 2005
Member # 43634
Posts: 112
|
I guess I shouldn't have taken the hour long call with the boss and had 2 gin and tonics while I was in the middle of my repsonse above. But I agree with the potential bearing issure.
Brett
__________________
'75 cabtop 392 T-19w Klune-V (David) LoMax-NP205 D60 14-bolt 5.13s ARBs '77 cabtop 392 T-19w STAK 3-spd w/OD (soon) D44 2.72s ARBs |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2000
Member # 1684
Location: Everett Wa USA
Posts: 2,758
|
Are you sure the bearings are pressed all of the way onto the carrier? If yes it sounds like you may have the wrong bearings....
In hind sight, if the old bearings were in good shape and good brand bearings you really didn't need to replace them. If the old ones were Timken and the new ones were "never heard of it before" brand I would have used the new ones for setups and reused the Timkens...
__________________
S.N.O.R.T. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Member # 32039
Posts: 110
|
The new ones are Timkin also. I also checked and rechecked to make sure they were all the down on the sleeve and tight up against the shoulder.
I took last night off to enjoy a grunge metal concert - will start up again today after work. I might buy a new set of bearings and races on the way home so that if the "new" ones are wrong or bad I don't have to postpone the work 'till tomorrow. I've been working on this for a couple of weeks now between school and work and am reaching the burn out stage. ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Member # 32039
Posts: 110
|
Could this be the problem?!?!?!?
Motive sent out: Bearing: LM501349 ID - 1.6250 width - .7800 Race: LM501314 OD - 2.8910 width - .8437 Timkens catalog says this: Bearing: LM501349 ID - 1.6250 width - .7800 Race: LM501311 OD - 2.8910 width .9060 Last edited by pityocamptes; 10-24-2007 at 02:14 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Member # 5733
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 2,152
|
some races are also thicker, out the old bearing & race together and compare with the new. (maybe this is what you mean by thicker)
Last edited by REDDMANIAC; 10-24-2007 at 03:32 PM. Reason: reword |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Addicted to Gear Oil
Join Date: Oct 2005
Member # 56050
Location: Oahu, Hawaii
Posts: 4,882
|
I'd say that .0623 would make a huge difference, and would explain your problem. Looks like you need to set up the gears again. That bearing number could very well be correct for the application, and be with in the manufacturing tolerances, unfortunately it's they aren;t the same as the ones you used to set up.
I would get a new set of bearings since you have pulled those on and off a few times already just to make sure the cage didn't get bent in the process. EDIT: I see you already got a new set of bearings...nevermind.
__________________
1965 Scout 80 7.3PSD/ZF/203/205 D60F/14BFF Member: 4 Jackstand Wheeler's Association Quote:
David H. Petraeus for President 2016Last edited by guidolyons; 10-24-2007 at 03:35 PM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|