![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read | Premium Memberships | Auto Loans |
![]() |
|
|
Share |
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Member # 15606
Location: Austin,TX
Posts: 225
|
what'll break first, a ? for physics majors.
I was wondering if I took a pair of 35x 15.5 sx's
or the 36x12.5 sx's which would last the longest on my front d30? would the added wieght of the 15.5's width be enough to equal the diameter of the 36s? just curious.
__________________
'88 YJ, SOA, 8.8 w/Detroit and 4.10's NV3550, and 36's |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
Thats like asking what came first.. a chicken or an egg..
It all depends on driving style and what your set up it.. Ive seen d30 welded hold up to 38.5x14.5 sx's.. Never broke a shaft, and wheeled the piss out of it.. and that was with the 260 joints.. He's on the board as 1lrgyj if you dont believe me
__________________
A conscience is what hurts when all your other parts feel so good |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Member # 15606
Location: Austin,TX
Posts: 225
|
regardless of the driving style (I didn't ask IF it would break) there has to be some physics guy who knows a formula or wheeler who's tried this.
__________________
'88 YJ, SOA, 8.8 w/Detroit and 4.10's NV3550, and 36's |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
its called rotating mass.. dont need to be a physics major to know that.. the heavier of the tire will put more stress on the axle.. most likely the 15.5 tire is a hell of a lot heavier than the 12.5.. so you do the math
__________________
A conscience is what hurts when all your other parts feel so good |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Member # 15606
Location: Austin,TX
Posts: 225
|
Quote:
__________________
'88 YJ, SOA, 8.8 w/Detroit and 4.10's NV3550, and 36's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
your talking about 1 inch.. and thats not ever true, because most tires never run the same.. the 35x15.5 will have more weight out at the end than the 36 x12.50.. Say you have a 250 lb man pushing on a breaker bar 35 inches from the nut.. and you have a 200 lb man pushing on a breaker bar 36 inches from the nut.. who will break the nut first..
Of course the 250 lb man, because he actually has more potential energy than the 200 lb man 1 inch further out
__________________
A conscience is what hurts when all your other parts feel so good Last edited by Imkunfused; 06-25-2003 at 01:35 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Low Range Drifter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Member # 7903
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 2,732
|
I'd pick the tall & skinny over short and fat.
A friend has been running 36x12.5 SXs for a couple of years on his D30 with ez-locker and it's held up so far. Not optimal, but spare shafts (and axles) are cheap and plentiful around here.
__________________
DEAK Racing #715 TREC B / Ultra 4 Mod Class Rig Thanks to Drivetrain Specialists and PAC Racing Springs for your support |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2001
Member # 7162
Location: Sebastopol, CA.
Posts: 371
|
It really boils down to your wheeling style. I blew out RD44's on 37's until I went to Warns and CTM's. If you crank your tires and bounce your axles and take the most challenging lines you'll have the opportunity to have a cool one... after your axles are changed.
If you take it easy and keep a smooth driving style, geared low and not hellbent to get it awn you'll have no problems The lighter tires will be the least stress on the axles, driving style will be the biggest stress.
__________________
Lockers, Rockers and a 22,000 RPM Margarita Blender |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Member # 9988
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 786
|
It's actually 1/2" because torque is a moment arm...which uses radius not diameter. This is discounting rolling radius, which is smaller then the tire radius.
__________________
Building tools that create the 4th state of matter. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Member # 17708
Location: central CA
Posts: 244
|
Its all about the torque, the wider tire wont produce that much more of a friction force because the "normal force" (weight of the vehicle) is distrubuted over a larger area. Also when your rock crawling most of the time only a small portion of your tire is actually in contact with the rock. That 1/2 inch larger wheel radius will have a much bigger effect then some people seem to think, refering to the none sence above about the 200lb vs. 250lb man. The weight of the tire is very small compared to the weight of the vehicle and the ft-lbs of torque the vehicle is able to produce to the axles (this is a lot lot more then what the engine produces becuase of the gear reduction). Without getting too technical Its more like a 7,000 lb man trying to twist your axle while its fixed in place at 18 inches away compared to a 7,050lb man doing the same thing but only 17.5 inches away. The force on the axle due to the 1/2 inch is much greater then the extra 50lbs of force from the weight of the tire. Figuring out the exact difference of stress put on the axle between the two situations requires a strong grasp of calculus because shear strength of a cylindrical shaped object is involved. I will say this though, depending on the situation your in when your wheeling, that half an inch could be 10,000 lbs of force or more put on your axles. I won't bore you guys anymore. My .02.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Zeus of the Sluice
Join Date: Jul 2001
Member # 6007
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 4,410
|
I ran 36x12.50 SXs with my D30 and after 3 months swapped 1-tons because it broke axles so often. I swear my 38x12.5 TSLs were lighter than those SXs, Krawlers heavier then both.
__________________
4-Seats of Fury LS1, 700r4, Atlas 3.0, 2.5 SAWs, Reds Lead Foot Syndicate |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|