what'll break first, a ? for physics majors. - Pirate4x4.Com : 4x4 and Off-Road Forum
 
Pirate4x4.Com : 4x4 and Off-Road Forum  

Go Back   Pirate4x4.Com : 4x4 and Off-Road Forum > Brand Specific Tech > Jeep - Hardcore Tech
Notices

Reply
 
Share Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-25-2003, 01:12 PM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Member # 15606
Location: Austin,TX
Posts: 225
what'll break first, a ? for physics majors.

I was wondering if I took a pair of 35x 15.5 sx's
or the 36x12.5 sx's which would last the longest on my front d30?

would the added wieght of the 15.5's width be enough to equal the diameter of the 36s?

just curious.
__________________
'88 YJ, SOA, 8.8 w/Detroit and 4.10's NV3550, and 36's
Neal'88yj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2003, 01:18 PM   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Imkunfused's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Member # 2804
Location: Sparks, NV
Posts: 2,359
Send a message via AIM to Imkunfused Send a message via Yahoo to Imkunfused
Thats like asking what came first.. a chicken or an egg..


It all depends on driving style and what your set up it.. Ive seen d30 welded hold up to 38.5x14.5 sx's.. Never broke a shaft, and wheeled the piss out of it.. and that was with the 260 joints..

He's on the board as 1lrgyj if you dont believe me
__________________
A conscience is what hurts when all your other parts feel so good
Imkunfused is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 06-25-2003, 01:24 PM   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Member # 15606
Location: Austin,TX
Posts: 225
regardless of the driving style (I didn't ask IF it would break) there has to be some physics guy who knows a formula or wheeler who's tried this.
__________________
'88 YJ, SOA, 8.8 w/Detroit and 4.10's NV3550, and 36's
Neal'88yj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2003, 01:27 PM   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Imkunfused's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Member # 2804
Location: Sparks, NV
Posts: 2,359
Send a message via AIM to Imkunfused Send a message via Yahoo to Imkunfused
its called rotating mass.. dont need to be a physics major to know that.. the heavier of the tire will put more stress on the axle.. most likely the 15.5 tire is a hell of a lot heavier than the 12.5.. so you do the math
__________________
A conscience is what hurts when all your other parts feel so good
Imkunfused is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2003, 01:31 PM   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Member # 15606
Location: Austin,TX
Posts: 225
Quote:
Originally posted by ImKuNfusED
its called rotating mass.. dont need to be a physics major to know that.. the heavier of the tire will put more stress on the axle.. most likely the 15.5 tire is a hell of a lot heavier than the 12.5.. so you do the math
Right but the 36 has more diameter thus producing more torque against the axle ( like using a cheater bar).
__________________
'88 YJ, SOA, 8.8 w/Detroit and 4.10's NV3550, and 36's
Neal'88yj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2003, 01:34 PM   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Imkunfused's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Member # 2804
Location: Sparks, NV
Posts: 2,359
Send a message via AIM to Imkunfused Send a message via Yahoo to Imkunfused
your talking about 1 inch.. and thats not ever true, because most tires never run the same.. the 35x15.5 will have more weight out at the end than the 36 x12.50.. Say you have a 250 lb man pushing on a breaker bar 35 inches from the nut.. and you have a 200 lb man pushing on a breaker bar 36 inches from the nut.. who will break the nut first..

Of course the 250 lb man, because he actually has more potential energy than the 200 lb man 1 inch further out
__________________
A conscience is what hurts when all your other parts feel so good

Last edited by Imkunfused; 06-25-2003 at 01:35 PM.
Imkunfused is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2003, 01:35 PM   #7 (permalink)
Low Range Drifter
 
JohnnyJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Member # 7903
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 2,732
I'd pick the tall & skinny over short and fat.

A friend has been running 36x12.5 SXs for a couple of years on his D30 with ez-locker and it's held up so far. Not optimal, but spare shafts (and axles) are cheap and plentiful around here.
__________________
DEAK Racing #715 TREC B / Ultra 4 Mod Class Rig
Thanks to Drivetrain Specialists and PAC Racing Springs for your support
JohnnyJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2003, 06:59 PM   #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2000
Member # 784
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 1,436
12.5s will be easier on the bearings and brakes as well
__________________
Think for yourself
JEEPRZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2003, 07:37 PM   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Member # 7162
Location: Sebastopol, CA.
Posts: 371
It really boils down to your wheeling style. I blew out RD44's on 37's until I went to Warns and CTM's. If you crank your tires and bounce your axles and take the most challenging lines you'll have the opportunity to have a cool one... after your axles are changed. If you take it easy and keep a smooth driving style, geared low and not hellbent to get it awn you'll have no problems The lighter tires will be the least stress on the axles, driving style will be the biggest stress.
__________________
Lockers, Rockers and a 22,000 RPM Margarita Blender
1988YJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2003, 07:45 PM   #10 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Member # 9988
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 786
It's actually 1/2" because torque is a moment arm...which uses radius not diameter. This is discounting rolling radius, which is smaller then the tire radius.
__________________
Building tools that create the 4th state of matter.
Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2003, 07:48 PM   #11 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Member # 8930
Location: San Diego
Posts: 158
Send a message via AIM to Cheg
Not a physics major but i did take a few classes

Don't forget the higher friction coefficient of the wider tires. Remember if your tires don't break loose under power, your ujoints might
Cheg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2003, 08:51 PM   #12 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Member # 5638
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 154
take that money and upgrade your axle... you dont want to learn the hard way.
__________________
No officer! i swear it came off the factory like that!
embro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2003, 11:14 PM   #13 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Member # 17708
Location: central CA
Posts: 244
Its all about the torque, the wider tire wont produce that much more of a friction force because the "normal force" (weight of the vehicle) is distrubuted over a larger area. Also when your rock crawling most of the time only a small portion of your tire is actually in contact with the rock. That 1/2 inch larger wheel radius will have a much bigger effect then some people seem to think, refering to the none sence above about the 200lb vs. 250lb man. The weight of the tire is very small compared to the weight of the vehicle and the ft-lbs of torque the vehicle is able to produce to the axles (this is a lot lot more then what the engine produces becuase of the gear reduction). Without getting too technical Its more like a 7,000 lb man trying to twist your axle while its fixed in place at 18 inches away compared to a 7,050lb man doing the same thing but only 17.5 inches away. The force on the axle due to the 1/2 inch is much greater then the extra 50lbs of force from the weight of the tire. Figuring out the exact difference of stress put on the axle between the two situations requires a strong grasp of calculus because shear strength of a cylindrical shaped object is involved. I will say this though, depending on the situation your in when your wheeling, that half an inch could be 10,000 lbs of force or more put on your axles. I won't bore you guys anymore. My .02.
flexjeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2003, 04:55 AM   #14 (permalink)
Zeus of the Sluice
 
bigdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Member # 6007
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 4,410
I ran 36x12.50 SXs with my D30 and after 3 months swapped 1-tons because it broke axles so often. I swear my 38x12.5 TSLs were lighter than those SXs, Krawlers heavier then both.
__________________
4-Seats of Fury
LS1, 700r4, Atlas 3.0, 2.5 SAWs, Reds

Lead Foot Syndicate
bigdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.