![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read | Premium Memberships | Auto Loans |
![]() |
|
|
Share |
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2000
Member # 874
Location: chesapeake, va
Posts: 41
|
Custome Frame: Bent or Straight
alright, i searched, found nothing, i'm thinking of getting some 2x4" box, 3/16" and making my own frame for my 5. do i really need to bend the box up over the axles like stock, or can i just have two straight runners front to rear? i plan to make the frame, slide in the rear 60 and front 44 and then throw in the 304 and t-18, then just plop the body on top. i need to redo all my body mounts anyways so i can do all that at the same time.
__________________
Van 2000 tj 3", 33x12.50 TSL dana 44 rear 1972 cj5, 304, t-15, m20, d30/d44 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Member # 11459
Location: windsor ontario canada
Posts: 28
|
Id be curious if anyone has done this.I would imagine you would have to run tour springs outboard so you could get sone reverse arch though.t
__________________
Its a newbie thing -you wouldnt understand! Todd Kelch-1980 jeep CJ-7,Amc,360,t-18a,dana 20,Front& Rear Dana44's(4.88 gears/arb's)SpringOver,35"-Boggers/Swampers-sx's,beadlocks,6 Point Rollcage, Rancho RS9000's& Warn HS9500 Winch(ect.........................) And of course SPRAY PAINT ORANGE! |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
get in touch with yldkat. he is a member but doesnt post much. he did what you are talking about but i think he ended up cuting the frame and laying the front and back part of the frame on top of the center section not sure why you will have to ask him to find out. the whole build up is on www.alloffroad.com look up yldkat i guess
__________________
the world might be passing you by, but its just going in circles 91 yj 5.7tbi/th350/d300/d60/14bolt/5.13s/detriots/xd9000i/soa on bds 3.5 yjs front/soa 4 inch waggys back/39.5 boggers on mrt beadlocks Last edited by yjtj; 04-28-2002 at 03:16 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2000
Member # 2358
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 293
|
I think a straight fram would cause some suspension problems, Not enough room for axle movement, also in the front the engine and axle clearance would be close. The only way everything would work is you would have to build it so tall, it would be unstable or very tall.
I am building my own frame and I plan on stacking the steel to give me the clearance I want.
__________________
1992 YJ "Pepe`" soon to be for sale 1994 YJ "??" for sale Ever stop to think and forget to start again |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2000
Member # 1760
Location: Salem Oregon
Posts: 1,534
|
If you look at your frame as the center line of gravity, a straight frame would have most of the weight above the center.
If you allow the mid-section to hang below the center line it will counter the weight that is above the center. I built my frame to allow the mid section to hang 7" below the center line....this will also help allow room for upward suspension travel but not necessary if you are not looking the the optimum center of gravity. -Kerry
__________________
-KB Last edited by BossBuilt; 04-28-2002 at 09:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Zeus of the Sluice
Join Date: May 2000
Member # 845
Location: VA
Posts: 2,639
|
For my frame i used 4x2x3/16". Everyone said it was too heavy but it only added about 40lbs over 1/8".
Mine is only rectangular tubing to the back of the t-case, it is tube from there. What I did was stacked the front portion of the frame on top of the middle part. Where it overlaps the ends are cut 45* on each so it flows nicely. I hope this makes sense, it is the way most people do it. Go for it. CJ |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|