![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Share |
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Member # 9357
Location: Mojave
Posts: 1,200
|
Manuel locking hub conversion for 88XJ? Or where can I find a RR D44?
I am simply a uninformed poster from the chevy section(I hate mini's you suckers) trying to help out a friend. Flame me all you want but give me(or him) good advice. Looking for a manuel locking hub conversion kit plus a 2 piece stub shaft eliminator(or a vacuum actuator eliminator). The tough part is this all has to be fairly cheap(bone yard parts) other wise we might rather go looking for a reverse rotation D44.
Charlo
__________________
Scrap metal with a chevy logo in front. BB,FI,1T, |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Member # 9357
Location: Mojave
Posts: 1,200
|
Well shit,as far as I can tell a reverse rotation D44 does'nt exhist. Son what do you jeepers run instead? Prolly easier to change Xfer cases I suppose.
Charlo
__________________
Scrap metal with a chevy logo in front. BB,FI,1T, |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Member # 11598
Location: USA
Posts: 6,062
|
What are you on??? A RC Dana 44 doesn't exist? Ever see a Ford Truck before?
Anyways...hub conversions are like $800 bucks and NOT worth it. Does the 44 have to be reverse cut? You can swap in a Waggy 44 Standard Rotation with Drivers drop relatively easily. You can go the harder route with the Ford RC 44 and have it cut down if you want to keep the stock width. Brackets for the Coils run about $300. For what its worth theres no reason to not go with a 44 in teh front.
__________________
This space for rent. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Jackstand Wheeler
Join Date: Jun 2002
Member # 12152
Location: Alpena, Michigan
Posts: 1,616
|
High Pinion is nice, but look at the front drive shaft, it's three freaking feet long, a Low pinion Dana 44 out of an '81 and newer Wagoneer will be plenty beefy, but you're out fo luck if you want to keep the 5 on 4.5 wheels, you're looking at either 6 on 5.5 or 5 on 5.5 with some hub and spindle swapping
__________________
'46 CJ-2A, '47 CJ-2A, '48 CJ-2A, '50 M38, '52 M38A1, '62 CJ-3B, '62 CJ-5, '65 CJ-5, (2) '66 CJ-5's, '67 CJ-5, '69 CJ-5, '69 J-3000, '70 CJ-101, '74 DJ-5, '74 CJ-5, '77 CJ-5, '78 CJ-5, '78 CJ-7, '78 Wagoneer, '95 YJ, '97 XJ...None of them run. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
high-pinion will keep your driveshaft outta the rocks All frontends should be high pinion, Ford is just the only one who didn't fuck that up. Hopefully we can meet on the trail sometime as I think we would have a good time watching the big displacment boys .CYA Collin
__________________
Screw you guys I'm going home. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Member # 7354
Location: Rocklin, CA
Posts: 2,356
|
HP 44s in 77-79 (I believe) had the welded on C clamps for the radius arms (as oppoesed to the cast). These are the desireble ones to get. They are 6 lug outers, but can be swapped for 5 on 5.5. Since your XJ has the smaller 260 u joints, I would say that the hub conversion is not cost effective compared to building a D44.
Good luck
__________________
If you are not pissed off, you are not paying attention. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Poor White Trash
Join Date: Apr 2001
Member # 4387
Location: Kalispell, MT
Posts: 1,891
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Member # 7354
Location: Rocklin, CA
Posts: 2,356
|
Quote:
SeanP
__________________
If you are not pissed off, you are not paying attention. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Member # 5577
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 1,783
|
Re: Manuel locking hub conversion for 88XJ? Or where can I find a RR D44?
Quote:
Personally, I'm holding out for the Jose hub conversion. It should be out by next spring...
__________________
It's all here before your eyes / Safety is a big disguise / That hides among the other lies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Member # 5577
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 1,783
|
Quote:
Sure the RC keeps the pinion outta the shit and that's definately a good thing, but the front driveshaft angles on an XJ are plenty fine even with the standard cut diff up front, especially if you've swapped in a longer transmission. So I say go with the Waggy front. Leave it 6-lug and throw in a Waggy 44 rear to match. You can keep it cheap or you can do the CTM/Warn shaft thing up front, throw in some Chromo axles in the back. Best part is, you end up with something that doesn't weigh a gazillion pounds when you're done (i.e. 60s). My $.02 USD, Jake
__________________
It's all here before your eyes / Safety is a big disguise / That hides among the other lies Last edited by Jakesteramalamajama; 08-20-2002 at 12:01 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Jackstand Wheeler
Join Date: Jun 2002
Member # 12152
Location: Alpena, Michigan
Posts: 1,616
|
I dunno, that extra couple of inches you gain under the front shaft with a HP axle doesn't seem worth it. Build a better driveshaft, I've had my whole Jeep resting on my front shaft, yeah it's got some scrapes, and I try not to do it all the time, but it didn't break, and I made it through. I would have run HP in my junk but I couldn't get 5.38's reverse cut at the time, now they are becoming available, so my custom width axle may be a HP, but then I gotta buy new gears again, and I've never had a problem with the LP
__________________
'46 CJ-2A, '47 CJ-2A, '48 CJ-2A, '50 M38, '52 M38A1, '62 CJ-3B, '62 CJ-5, '65 CJ-5, (2) '66 CJ-5's, '67 CJ-5, '69 CJ-5, '69 J-3000, '70 CJ-101, '74 DJ-5, '74 CJ-5, '77 CJ-5, '78 CJ-5, '78 CJ-7, '78 Wagoneer, '95 YJ, '97 XJ...None of them run. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Jackstand Wheeler
Join Date: Jun 2002
Member # 12152
Location: Alpena, Michigan
Posts: 1,616
|
Hey, thanks for watching my tech, didn't know I had a fan club. Hope to wheel with everyone on the planet some day, I love watching anyone blow their junk up, even when it's me on video tape. The only thing I love more is to watch someone take on a seemingly impossible line and make it look like pulling in the driveway, or watching a newbie make it through any technical section for the first time with a big smile on their face, that makes it all for me.
__________________
'46 CJ-2A, '47 CJ-2A, '48 CJ-2A, '50 M38, '52 M38A1, '62 CJ-3B, '62 CJ-5, '65 CJ-5, (2) '66 CJ-5's, '67 CJ-5, '69 CJ-5, '69 J-3000, '70 CJ-101, '74 DJ-5, '74 CJ-5, '77 CJ-5, '78 CJ-5, '78 CJ-7, '78 Wagoneer, '95 YJ, '97 XJ...None of them run. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Member # 9357
Location: Mojave
Posts: 1,200
|
Quote:
Thanks for the good advice. Charlo
__________________
Scrap metal with a chevy logo in front. BB,FI,1T, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Member # 9357
Location: Mojave
Posts: 1,200
|
Quote:
Charlo
__________________
Scrap metal with a chevy logo in front. BB,FI,1T, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2000
Member # 784
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 1,435
|
Quote:
__________________
Think for yourself |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Member # 5577
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 1,783
|
Quote:
![]() Jake
__________________
It's all here before your eyes / Safety is a big disguise / That hides among the other lies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2000
Member # 1635
Location: Minne-so-cold
Posts: 3,972
|
Quote:
Stay away from 1/2 ton 78-79 axles. Junk (search the Ford section) The 77.5-79 F250 axles are good, just 1" longer on the pass. axle shaft. If you keeping the Ford brakes go with a 76-77 disk set up. If you goin with Chevy brakes go with 73-75 to save ca$h. Quote:
Jakesteramalamajama, that argumment on the Reverse Spiral being weaker. It's simillar the argument of keep it in two wheel drive until you get stuck then stick it in four wheel drive to back out.
__________________
Proud Catholic | My Dana Articles and Info -> http://77cj.littlekeylime.com/web_rs44.html |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|