Manuel locking hub conversion for 88XJ? Or where can I find a RR D44? - Pirate4x4.Com : 4x4 and Off-Road Forum
 
Pirate4x4.Com : 4x4 and Off-Road Forum  

Go Back   Pirate4x4.Com : 4x4 and Off-Road Forum > Brand Specific Tech > Jeep - Hardcore Tech
Notices

Reply
 
Share Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-19-2002, 11:32 PM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Member # 9357
Location: Mojave
Posts: 1,200
Manuel locking hub conversion for 88XJ? Or where can I find a RR D44?

I am simply a uninformed poster from the chevy section(I hate mini's you suckers) trying to help out a friend. Flame me all you want but give me(or him) good advice. Looking for a manuel locking hub conversion kit plus a 2 piece stub shaft eliminator(or a vacuum actuator eliminator). The tough part is this all has to be fairly cheap(bone yard parts) other wise we might rather go looking for a reverse rotation D44.


Charlo
__________________
Scrap metal with a chevy logo in front. BB,FI,1T,
charlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2002, 11:48 PM   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Member # 9357
Location: Mojave
Posts: 1,200
Well shit,as far as I can tell a reverse rotation D44 does'nt exhist. Son what do you jeepers run instead? Prolly easier to change Xfer cases I suppose.

Charlo
__________________
Scrap metal with a chevy logo in front. BB,FI,1T,
charlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 08-19-2002, 11:56 PM   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Jason R's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Member # 11598
Location: USA
Posts: 6,063
What are you on??? A RC Dana 44 doesn't exist? Ever see a Ford Truck before?

Anyways...hub conversions are like $800 bucks and NOT worth it. Does the 44 have to be reverse cut?

You can swap in a Waggy 44 Standard Rotation with Drivers drop relatively easily.


You can go the harder route with the Ford RC 44 and have it cut down if you want to keep the stock width.

Brackets for the Coils run about $300. For what its worth theres no reason to not go with a 44 in teh front.
__________________
This space for rent.
Jason R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2002, 06:34 AM   #4 (permalink)
Jackstand Wheeler
 
4Bangler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Member # 12152
Location: Alpena, Michigan
Posts: 1,616
High Pinion is nice, but look at the front drive shaft, it's three freaking feet long, a Low pinion Dana 44 out of an '81 and newer Wagoneer will be plenty beefy, but you're out fo luck if you want to keep the 5 on 4.5 wheels, you're looking at either 6 on 5.5 or 5 on 5.5 with some hub and spindle swapping
__________________
'46 CJ-2A, '47 CJ-2A, '48 CJ-2A, '50 M38, '52 M38A1, '62 CJ-3B, '62 CJ-5, '65 CJ-5, (2) '66 CJ-5's, '67 CJ-5, '69 CJ-5, '69 J-3000, '70 CJ-101, '74 DJ-5, '74 CJ-5, '77 CJ-5, '78 CJ-5, '78 CJ-7, '78 Wagoneer, '95 YJ, '97 XJ...None of them run.
4Bangler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2002, 09:27 AM   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Member # 4099
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 1,030
Send a message via AIM to JEEP_TJ_FREAK Send a message via Yahoo to JEEP_TJ_FREAK
Quote:
Originally posted by 4Bangler
High Pinion is nice, but look at the front drive shaft, it's three freaking feet long, a Low pinion Dana 44 out of an '81 and newer Wagoneer will be plenty beefy, but you're out fo luck if you want to keep the 5 on 4.5 wheels, you're looking at either 6 on 5.5 or 5 on 5.5 with some hub and spindle swapping
Man, you missed it this time. I think that is a first for ya, I really watch your tech.

high-pinion will keep your driveshaft outta the rocks
All frontends should be high pinion, Ford is just the only one who didn't fuck that up.

Hopefully we can meet on the trail sometime as I think we would have a good time watching the big displacment boys .

CYA
Collin
__________________
Screw you guys I'm going home.
JEEP_TJ_FREAK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2002, 09:42 AM   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Member # 7354
Location: Rocklin, CA
Posts: 2,353
HP 44s in 77-79 (I believe) had the welded on C clamps for the radius arms (as oppoesed to the cast). These are the desireble ones to get. They are 6 lug outers, but can be swapped for 5 on 5.5. Since your XJ has the smaller 260 u joints, I would say that the hub conversion is not cost effective compared to building a D44.

Good luck
__________________
If you are not pissed off, you are not paying attention.
SeanP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2002, 10:39 AM   #7 (permalink)
Poor White Trash
 
Norm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Member # 4387
Location: Kalispell, MT
Posts: 1,875
Quote:
Originally posted by SeanP
HP 44s in 77-79 (I believe) had the welded on C clamps for the radius arms (as oppoesed to the cast). These are the desireble ones to get. They are 6 lug outers, but can be swapped for 5 on 5.5. Since your XJ has the smaller 260 u joints, I would say that the hub conversion is not cost effective compared to building a D44.

Good luck
77 1/2 to 79 1/2 tons were all 5x5.5 outers to the best of my knowledge. The 3/4 ton version were eight lug with spring pads.
Norm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2002, 11:17 AM   #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Member # 7354
Location: Rocklin, CA
Posts: 2,353
Quote:
Originally posted by Norm


77 1/2 to 79 1/2 tons were all 5x5.5 outers to the best of my knowledge. The 3/4 ton version were eight lug with spring pads.
sweet, even better. My friend just built a D44 from that year truck and he is running 6 lug wheels. He must have changed something out.

SeanP
__________________
If you are not pissed off, you are not paying attention.
SeanP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2002, 11:33 AM   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Member # 5577
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 1,783
Re: Manuel locking hub conversion for 88XJ? Or where can I find a RR D44?

Quote:
Originally posted by charlo
Looking for a Manuel locking hub conversion...


Charlo
Are those the new Mexican hub locks I read about in 4-Wheeler?

Personally, I'm holding out for the Jose hub conversion. It should be out by next spring...

__________________
It's all here before your eyes / Safety is a big disguise / That hides among the other lies
Jakesteramalamajama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2002, 11:51 AM   #10 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Member # 5577
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 1,783
Quote:
Originally posted by JEEP_TJ_FREAK


Man, you missed it this time. I think that is a first for ya, I really watch your tech.

high-pinion will keep your driveshaft outta the rocks
All frontends should be high pinion, Ford is just the only one who didn't fuck that up.

Hopefully we can meet on the trail sometime as I think we would have a good time watching the big displacment boys .

CYA
Collin
I gotta go with 4bangler on this one. 19 times outta 20, it's the shafts (U-joints) that go on a 44 anyhow so the extra strength in the pig is a moot point. (and really, it's only stronger when you're traveling in a forward direction--think about a scenario when you're backing up out of something and there's MORE weight on the front axle than the rear... isn't it better to have the added beef then rather than when you're going up a hill forward and most of the weight is being carried by the rear axle...?)

Sure the RC keeps the pinion outta the shit and that's definately a good thing, but the front driveshaft angles on an XJ are plenty fine even with the standard cut diff up front, especially if you've swapped in a longer transmission.

So I say go with the Waggy front. Leave it 6-lug and throw in a Waggy 44 rear to match. You can keep it cheap or you can do the CTM/Warn shaft thing up front, throw in some Chromo axles in the back. Best part is, you end up with something that doesn't weigh a gazillion pounds when you're done (i.e. 60s).

My $.02 USD,
Jake
__________________
It's all here before your eyes / Safety is a big disguise / That hides among the other lies

Last edited by Jakesteramalamajama; 08-20-2002 at 12:01 PM.
Jakesteramalamajama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2002, 12:32 PM   #11 (permalink)
Jackstand Wheeler
 
4Bangler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Member # 12152
Location: Alpena, Michigan
Posts: 1,616
I dunno, that extra couple of inches you gain under the front shaft with a HP axle doesn't seem worth it. Build a better driveshaft, I've had my whole Jeep resting on my front shaft, yeah it's got some scrapes, and I try not to do it all the time, but it didn't break, and I made it through. I would have run HP in my junk but I couldn't get 5.38's reverse cut at the time, now they are becoming available, so my custom width axle may be a HP, but then I gotta buy new gears again, and I've never had a problem with the LP
__________________
'46 CJ-2A, '47 CJ-2A, '48 CJ-2A, '50 M38, '52 M38A1, '62 CJ-3B, '62 CJ-5, '65 CJ-5, (2) '66 CJ-5's, '67 CJ-5, '69 CJ-5, '69 J-3000, '70 CJ-101, '74 DJ-5, '74 CJ-5, '77 CJ-5, '78 CJ-5, '78 CJ-7, '78 Wagoneer, '95 YJ, '97 XJ...None of them run.
4Bangler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2002, 12:35 PM   #12 (permalink)
Jackstand Wheeler
 
4Bangler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Member # 12152
Location: Alpena, Michigan
Posts: 1,616
Hey, thanks for watching my tech, didn't know I had a fan club. Hope to wheel with everyone on the planet some day, I love watching anyone blow their junk up, even when it's me on video tape. The only thing I love more is to watch someone take on a seemingly impossible line and make it look like pulling in the driveway, or watching a newbie make it through any technical section for the first time with a big smile on their face, that makes it all for me.
__________________
'46 CJ-2A, '47 CJ-2A, '48 CJ-2A, '50 M38, '52 M38A1, '62 CJ-3B, '62 CJ-5, '65 CJ-5, (2) '66 CJ-5's, '67 CJ-5, '69 CJ-5, '69 J-3000, '70 CJ-101, '74 DJ-5, '74 CJ-5, '77 CJ-5, '78 CJ-5, '78 CJ-7, '78 Wagoneer, '95 YJ, '97 XJ...None of them run.
4Bangler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2002, 04:41 PM   #13 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Member # 9357
Location: Mojave
Posts: 1,200
Quote:
Hopefully we can meet on the trail sometime as I think we would have a good time watching the big displacment boys .
Well This is for my friends XJ not mine. I don't wheel my 2wd XJ thats what my K5 with a 383 is for. You can watch that blow up instead. I think I talked him into a waggy front but hes already got a locked 44 rear. So can we get the spindles and shit from a "77 1/2 to 79 1/2 tons were all 5x5.5 outers to the best of my knowledge. The 3/4 ton version were eight lug with spring pads. "???
Thanks for the good advice.


Charlo
__________________
Scrap metal with a chevy logo in front. BB,FI,1T,
charlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2002, 04:50 PM   #14 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Member # 9357
Location: Mojave
Posts: 1,200
Quote:
Are those the new Mexican hub locks I read about in 4-Wheeler?
I am surprised they have not come out with an automatic locking hub conversion kit to replace the vacuum shit those XJs come with. I see problems all the time. Some jeeper is losing traction so he floors it and @ wide open throttle he looses manifold vacuum and sometimes his 4 wheel drive right when he needs it most. I can't imagine what it would be like on a carburated jeep with a rough idle cam.


Charlo
__________________
Scrap metal with a chevy logo in front. BB,FI,1T,
charlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2002, 07:07 PM   #15 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2000
Member # 784
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 1,436
Quote:
Originally posted by charlo
Well This is for my friends XJ not mine. I don't wheel my 2wd XJ thats what my K5 with a 383 is for. You can watch that blow up instead. I think I talked him into a waggy front but hes already got a locked 44 rear. So can we get the spindles and shit from a "77 1/2 to 79 1/2 tons were all 5x5.5 outers to the best of my knowledge. The 3/4 ton version were eight lug with spring pads. "???
Thanks for the good advice.


Charlo
He should get the waggy rear44 to match, and swap the gears and locker from the XJ 44. Then sell the XJ 44 to offset the cost of both of the waggy 44s
__________________
Think for yourself
JEEPRZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2002, 05:39 AM   #16 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Member # 5577
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 1,783
Quote:
Originally posted by charlo

I am surprised they have not come out ...
I was just making light of your misspelling of the word 'manual' and changing it to 'Manuel' which is a common Mexican first name. (pronounced man-well)


Jake
__________________
It's all here before your eyes / Safety is a big disguise / That hides among the other lies
Jakesteramalamajama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2002, 07:22 PM   #17 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Mr.N's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Member # 1635
Location: Minne-so-cold
Posts: 3,961
Quote:
Originally posted by charlo
So can we get the spindles and stuff from a "77 1/2 to 79 1/2 tons were all 5x5.5 outers to the best of my knowledge. The 3/4 ton version were eight lug with spring pads. "???
Thanks for the good advice.
That's bad advice.
Stay away from 1/2 ton 78-79 axles. Junk (search the Ford section)
The 77.5-79 F250 axles are good, just 1" longer on the pass. axle shaft.
If you keeping the Ford brakes go with a 76-77 disk set up.
If you goin with Chevy brakes go with 73-75 to save ca$h.

Quote:
Originally posted by SeanP
HP 44s in 77-79 (I believe) had the welded on C clamps for the radius arms (as oppoesed to the cast).
Nope, the 78-79 have the all in one casting crap. Again stay away UNLESS your staying with the Ford coil system.


Jakesteramalamajama, that argumment on the Reverse Spiral being weaker. It's simillar the argument of keep it in two wheel drive until you get stuck then stick it in four wheel drive to back out.
__________________
Proud Catholic | My Dana Articles and Info -> http://77cj.littlekeylime.com/web_rs44.html
Mr.N is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.