![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read | Premium Memberships | Auto Loans |
![]() |
|
|
Share |
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Member # 55446
Posts: 16
|
Yet another Waggy d44 question
Yes, I have my flame proof underwear on. I am putting a late 70's Dana 44 out of a Wagoneer in my 85 CJ7. I narrowed the housing 4 inches, and I am using Dana 30 knuckles with warn internal hub conversion and alloy axles. I know this subject has been beat into the ground, and I have found tons of useful info, but I am wondering what wms measurement other people with this setup ended up with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Sawzall Me Timbers!
Join Date: Oct 2004
Member # 36471
Location: Maryland
Posts: 556
|
if your building it you should know best.
waggie housings are 61.5 to 62 inches wide. if your narrowing four inches you would be 58 inches (given that the 30 outers give about the same width)
__________________
Brandon Appalachian Offroad Westminster, Maryland 410-848-2942 95 yj, 104" wb (waggy front and 4 link rear), stock 4.0L, sm465, 4.3 atlas, hp 60, 14bolt, detroits and 5.38's, 39" krawlers on allieds |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Member # 55446
Posts: 16
|
Didn't know if I would end up getting the same width out of the D30 outers. I guess I am just getting axious, this is biggest mod I have done in the 11 years I have owned the rig, I don't want this project to also turn into the biggest f-up.
Last edited by dablkjp; 10-13-2005 at 09:49 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Member # 3645
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,874
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Member # 55446
Posts: 16
|
Doing it this way I'll use new stock steering, spindles, bearings, brakes, etc... I think this will wind up easier, I hope, maybe. The only thing is the size of the D30 knuckles is much smaller, hopefully they'll hold up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Member # 36693
Posts: 38
|
seems odd to me to use stock d30 stuff the whole point of building a 44 is to get bigger brakes and rebuildable bearings. the gear strength with a lp 44 is close to a 30. if it were me to save the trouble of building a 44 just to put 30 outers on i would just truss the 30 and run cromos dosn't seem like you getting much out of this mod except a heavier axle and less ground clearance??
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2000
Member # 1533
Location: Parker, CO
Posts: 2,779
|
Quote:
The point of keeping Dana 44 outers is stronger outer axleshafts, the bigger ujoint, and internal hubs. This guy has addressed part of that with the internal hubs. Last edited by CSP; 10-13-2005 at 06:23 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Member # 55446
Posts: 16
|
The stock Wagoneer uses 19 spline outer axles and the 5-297 u-joints, the Warn outer axles I am using are 30 spline and use 5-297 u-joints. Also, I had always heard that 4.56's in a D30 were bad news, that is probably as much the reason I am doing this as anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2000
Member # 1533
Location: Parker, CO
Posts: 2,779
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Member # 36693
Posts: 38
|
yea didn't see that you were using the older d30 stuff. why wouldn't you use the 44 stuff (not sure but seems to me that there is more aftermarket suport for 44 stuff) 4.56 in a 30 are find so are 4.88 the gears mesh just the same with the same amount of contact. and as for the spline discussion ahhh another day...
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|