![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read | Premium Memberships | Auto Loans |
![]() |
|
|
Share |
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Member # 7755
Location: Main Line PA
Posts: 1,953
|
CVs and axle Listing
Here it is, for those looking for spares/upgrade:
Front axles found in North America: Suffix A axles: 23 spline cv, 10 spline at the dif Found in: most 87 range rovers, few 88s (these are the ones you want) Suffix B axles: 32 spline cv (non abs ring), 10 spline at the dif Found in: few late 87 range rovers, most 88s, all 89s. Early ABS axles: 32 spline cvs, 10spline at the dif Found in: 90-mid 93 range rovers Note: cvs interchange with later ABS axles Late ABS axles: 32 spline cvs, 24spline at the dif Found in: 93 and up range rover classics, 94, 95, and 97 D90s, all Disco Is Note: 94-95 D90 no abs NAS D110 axles: 23 spline cv, 10 spline at the dif, larger hub and spindle to accomidate "1 ton" cvs without major changes (these are the ones you really, really want but good luck )Rear axles found in North America: 87-89 range rover 10 spline "wet" hubs Note: Cannot swap in later 24 spline or 10spline, aftermarket is available 90-mid 93 range rover 10 spline ABS hubs Note: Can upgrade to 24 spline using later ABS axle shafts mid 93 range rover, all D90, all disco I 24 spline "ABS" hubs 1993 110 salisbury rear 24 spline Note: Basically a D60. 4 pin dif. Ron
__________________
:evil: |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Registered - Active
Join Date: Jan 2002
Member # 9461
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 1,763
|
Thanks for the info dude,
One thing to keep in mind about using early RR ABS CV's (32 splines), is that the outer axle seal inside of the stub axle in a late model D90 or Disco 1 is too small in diameter to allow the RR CV to slip inside. You must remove the axle seal out of the stub axle. This will allow swivel ball grease to inhabit both the swivel ball area and the wheel bearing area of the hubs (which I kinda like anyway). As far as the 110 "1 ton" 23 spline CV's go (AEU 2522), the Genuine GKN's are pretty expensive and can be sourced from Bill at GBR, and ECR here in the states (mucho dinero both places). Several places in the UK will sell you GKN's (120-160 pounds), and non-genuine's (60-80 pounds). You will need to address the hub issues with the larger AEU 2522's as the outer axle is about 1/2" longer than the regular late model D1/D90 32 spline CV. Either change the whole outer hub assembly and use 110 drive flanges (like ECR), or use some GBR proprietary drive flanges (like GBR). I remember seeing a post on the D90 list a long time ago about the AEU 2522's saying they were approx 35-40% stronger than the late model 32 spline CV's (source was maxidrive I believe but can't substantiate). In addition, the AEU 2522's have no ABS ring. But my GEMs equipped '97 D90 doesn't seem to mind too much (with only intermittant check engine lights that go away by themselves). Blister ps. Here is a pict comparing the axle ends of the standard 32 spline front axle (albeit slightly screwed), and the Ashcroft 23/24 spline front axles: Last edited by FrankenRover; 02-03-2002 at 07:20 AM. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Member # 7755
Location: Main Line PA
Posts: 1,953
|
Good points on both Bill. I forgot to mention the seal issue.
I am still working on the R.O.W. stuff. When I figure it out completely I will post another one. The suffix A 87 range rover axle uses a 23 spline cv. This (I am fairly sure) is found in almost all rovers 70-87. The "1 ton" 23 spline cv (more appropriately called the 110 county cv) is marginally different. The cv is different enough but the only advantage over the RR 23 spline cv is a slightly different cage design. I have a suffix A rangie axle under my 110 and I am trying to get it sorted so that I can use the AVM hubs. Ashcroft or Maxidrive 24 spline inners while keeping the suffix A 23 spline cvs. Ron
__________________
:evil: |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Rock God
Join Date: Apr 2001
Member # 4101
Location: Santa Fe
Posts: 2,232
|
Seems to me Bill, that the "1 ton" inner axle has a smaller root diameter (just past the splines) than the stock axle. Obviously the 23 spline is much larger, but what's the diff if the axle diam. is smaller? Of course it could be the camera angle...
How were the 30-40% stronger figures derived? Looking at evilfj's comparo' of the actual dimensions of standard v.s. 1-ton, they really didn't look any different..At least not 30-40% different. I hope I'm wrong though. --D
__________________
Hendrix 'X' Chassis #006 http://www.hunt4steve.com/Doug.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Registered - Active
Join Date: Jan 2002
Member # 9461
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 1,763
|
Hey D,
The axle diameters, once you get inboard of the splined outer, are exactly the same (I just measured them). As far as the CV's go, the early 110 CV's have a beefier housing when you look at them side to side, with more material around the inner edge. If you look closely at the picture on the ECR site (I wish I had taken pictures of mine before they went in), you might be able to see this, as well as the star differences. The thickness of the inner "circle" of the star is extremely thin on the 32 spline CV's and a bit thicker on the 23 spline CV's. I am not sure if this matters, but I would think it should. Next time I have the CV's out, then I will snap some detailed side by side picts of the CV's for everyone to gander at. Blister Here is the ECR pict with the 23 spline CV on the left: |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|