U.S. Eyes Change in Endangered Species Act - Pirate4x4.Com : 4x4 and Off-Road Forum
Pirate4x4.Com : 4x4 and Off-Road Forum  

Go Back   Pirate4x4.Com : 4x4 and Off-Road Forum > Land Use and Trails > Land Use Issues

Share Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-29-2003, 05:32 AM   #1 (permalink)
Crowdog's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2001
Member # 2787
Location: Shingle Springs, CA
Posts: 2,245
U.S. Eyes Change in Endangered Species Act

U.S. Eyes Change in Endangered Species Act

By Christopher Doering

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on Wednesday called for changes to the Endangered Species Act to allow the service to determine the needs for critical habitat to avoid delays caused by litigation.

Environmental groups said the proposal amounted to an attack on the habitats that protect animals and plants in jeopardy of extinction.

Craig Mason, assistant secretary for the Fish and Wildlife Service, said the agency needed to have the ability to determine which species required immediate attention, rather than having the courts decide.

The agency has asked Congress to allow it to shift money from other endangered species programs to meet the habitat designation deadlines. It also will ask plaintiffs and the court to extend deadlines for 32 species.

In an Interior Department document obtained by Reuters, the service said it wants to change the current system for designating "critical habitat" -- land that is determined to be essential to the survival of a species.

The Endangered Species Act requires that critical habitat land be designated when a species is determined to be at risk. However, lack of information and resources often delay the process, according to the service, a part of the Department of the Interior.

The agency said court orders scolding it for failing to designate critical habitat undermined conservation efforts.

Nearly two-thirds of the $9 million budgeted in 2003 for species protection was earmarked to comply with court orders and settlements, according to the agency. Faced with growing litigation costs, the service will run out of funds by July to meet the court mandated orders, the agency said.

In 2001, more than 1,250 animals and plants were on the U.S. endangered or threatened species list.

In a statement, a number of environmental groups said the Fish and Wildlife Service's belief that critical habitat protection has no benefit to the species will make it less likely the Bush administration will support the rule.

"They are not going to defend this and are unlikely to defend it in court," said Susan Holmes, a spokesman for Earthjustice. "It seems like a veiled attempt to get Congress to change the law."
UTVGuide.net | Facebook | UTV Blog | UTV Industry News
Crowdog is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-29-2003, 05:45 AM   #2 (permalink)
Crowdog's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2001
Member # 2787
Location: Shingle Springs, CA
Posts: 2,245
Endangered Species Act 'Broken' - Flood Of Litigation Over Critical Habitat
By The Sierra Times

Faced with mounting numbers of court orders from six years of litigation, the Interior Department's U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will soon run out of funds to designate critical habitat for threatened and endangered species, Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Fish and Wildlife and Parks Craig Manson said Wednesday.
More important, the flood of court orders requiring critical habitat designations is undermining endangered species conservation by compromising the Service's ability to protect new species and to work with states, tribes, landowners and others to recover those already listed under the Act, Manson said.

In July, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will exhaust the funds required to meet its obligations to designate critical habitat under court orders and settlements for FY 2003. The administration has requested authority from Congress to shift money from other endangered species programs to cover the shortfall. These include programs to work with landowners on conservation projects to keep imperiled species from needing listing under the Act, consultation with other federal agencies to protect species, and recovery work for species already threatened or endangered.

The Service will also approach plaintiffs and courts to seek extensions to deadlines in affecting 32 species. These extensions will be sought solely in order of the due dates of the court orders.

"The Endangered Species Act is broken. This flood of litigation over critical habitat designation is preventing the Fish and Wildlife Service from protecting new species and reducing its ability to recover plants and animals already listed as threatened or endangered," Manson said. "Imagine an emergency room where lawsuits force the doctors to treat sprained ankles while patients with heart attacks expire in the waiting room and you've got a good picture of our endangered species program right now."

The President's FY 2004 budget request for listing totals nearly $12.3 million, an amount that, if approved by Congress, is almost double the $6.2 million appropriated in FY 2000 and a 35 percent increase over FY 2003.

But Manson emphasized that additional funding alone will not solve the long-term problem.

"Conserving habitat is essential for endangered species, but critical habitat as mandated by the ESA frustrates that goal," he said. "This is a classic example of good intentions failing the test of reality."

Manson noted that two-thirds of the endangered species listing budget is being consumed by court orders and settlement agreements requiring designation of critical habitat for species already on the endangered species list. In most instances, designation of critical habitat provides little additional protection for endangered species.

"This is not a new problem," he said. "The previous administration also testified before Congress that this situation is detrimental to species conservation and needs to be resolved. The ever-increasing number of lawsuits has now brought this problem to a crisis where we are simply out of funds for this year."

Designating an area as critical habitat means that federal agencies are required to consult with the Fish and Wildlife Service on the impacts of actions they authorize, fund, or carry out, on designated critical habitat.

However, these requirements provide little additional protection for most species. This is because, as soon as a species is listed, federal agencies are already required to consult on the impacts of their activities on the species, whether or not critical habitat is officially designated.

In almost all cases, recovery of listed species will come through voluntary cooperative partnerships, not regulatory measures such as critical habitat. Habitat is also protected through cooperative measures under the ESA including Habitat Conservation Plans, Safe Harbor Agreements, Candidate Conservation Agreements, and state grant programs. In addition, voluntary partnership programs such as the Service's Private Stewardship Grants and Partners for Fish and Wildlife program also restore habitat. Many national wildlife refuges, managed by the Fish and Wildlife Service, provide habitat for endangered species, and states also provide for endangered species on their wildlife management areas.

The ESA requires that critical habitat be designated at the time of listing to the maximum extent prudent and determinable. Facing many species in need of protection, a limited budget, and incomplete knowledge about the distribution and needs of species, the previous administration made designation of critical habitat a lower priority than other listing actions. Moreover, that administration found that designation was "not prudent" for the vast majority of species as critical habitat would not provide a benefit to the species.

Lawsuits have greatly increased since 1997, when an appeals court ruled that this "not prudent" standard did not comply with the ESA. Another appeals court shortly thereafter held that courts must order the Service to designate critical habitat, even if it is lower in priority than other actions required by the ESA. Since that time, the Service has been sued over failure to designate critical habitat for species at the time they were listed, and when resources were diverted to address that issue, for missing other statutory deadlines. In addition, there have been challenges to the merits of the critical habitat designations made pursuant to these court orders.

Critical habitat designations impact species listings because both activities are funded from the same part of the Fish and Wildlife Service's budget. Critical habitat designations are far more time consuming and costly than listings.

Congress provided a total of $6 million in the FY 2003 to designate critical habitat for already listed species, nearly two-thirds of the $9.077 million budget for the Service's endangered species listing program. The Service estimates the total cost of complying with all court orders and court-approved settlement agreements requiring the Service to work on critical habitat for already listed species in FY 2003 to be approximately $8 million, leaving a shortfall of $2 million.

"Spending more than two-thirds of our listing budget on critical habitat for already listed species flies in the face of logic and the intent of the Endangered Species Act. We need to make decisions about how to use our limited resources based on the most urgent needs of species, not on who can get into a courtroom first," Manson said.

UTVGuide.net | Facebook | UTV Blog | UTV Industry News
Crowdog is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Pirate4x4.Com : 4x4 and Off-Road Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.


Email Address:
Please select your insurance company (Optional)


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2016 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.