Fish and Wildlife Service Agrees to Perform Status Reviews for 194 Species in Califor - Pirate4x4.Com : 4x4 and Off-Road Forum
 
Pirate4x4.Com : 4x4 and Off-Road Forum  

Go Back   Pirate4x4.Com : 4x4 and Off-Road Forum > Land Use and Trails > Land Use Issues
Notices

Reply
 
Share Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-25-2005, 08:24 AM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Member # 9328
Location: At the Mountains of Madness
Posts: 2,794
Fish and Wildlife Service Agrees to Perform Status Reviews for 194 Species in Califor

Fish and Wildlife Service Agrees to Perform Status Reviews for 194 Species in California

Contact: Dawn Collier
Phone: (916) 419-7111

Sacramento,CA; September 20, 2005: The United States Fish and Wildlife Service has agreed to perform status reviews for all 194 California species that Pacific Legal Foundation filed suit earlier this year to compel. Although the Endangered Species Act requires that the government review the status of listed species every five years, the Fish and Wildlife Service has failed to perform the reviews for about two-thirds of California’s listed species. A federal court approved a settlement between the Fish and Wildlife Service and PLF this morning.

Under the terms of the agreement, the Fish and Wildlife Service agreed to perform all of the reviews over the next eight years, with the first wave of reviews beginning by the end of this month. The agency agreed to prioritize the species reviews according to how much is known about the species in question and how onerous their listing has been for California property owners and businesses.

"The government has recognized that there is no justification for failing to comply with the law. This settlement allows the Fish and Wildlife Service the time to do a thorough analysis of each species, and make sure that taxpayer dollars are only being spent on species that truly need protecting," said Pacific Legal Foundation Principal Attorney Rob Rivett.

"When federal regulation is restricting land use, raising home prices, and killing jobs, the government owes it to Californians to do the work necessary to determine if those regulations are actually necessary," said Rivett. "We expect this effort will allow Californians to get back to work building the schools and homes they need that have been mired in gridlock because of outdated listings."

Under Section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. Section 1533(c)(2), the Fish and Wildlife Service must perform status reviews of listed species every five years to determine whether, based on current best available science, each listed species should have its status changed (i.e., either lowered from endangered to threatened or raised from threatened to endangered), or have its status as a listed species removed because protection is no longer justified.

Because the service has failed to perform the reviews for 194 of California’s 298 listed species, the agency has no way of knowing if the government is wasting millions of taxpayer dollars on species that no longer need protection or forcing burdensome and costly land use restrictions on Californians unnecessarily. The high cost of complying with land use regulations to protect species raises the cost of everything from homes to food in California, and significantly impacts the state’s economy.

The plaintiffs in the case are the California State Grange, the California Cattlemen’s Association, and the California Forestry Association.

Click here for a copy of the settlement, including a list of species and the timeline for the five-year reviews.

About Pacific Legal Foundation
Pacific Legal Foundation is the nation’s oldest and largest public interest legal organization dedicated to defending private property rights. PLF is a national leader in the effort to reform the Endangered Species Act and raise awareness of the Act’s impact on people. PLF’s headquarters are in Sacramento, California.

###
To arrange interviews on this issue, journalists and producers may contact PLF's Media Director, Dawn Collier, at (916) 419-7111.

http://www.pacificlegal.org/view_PLF...+in+California
__________________
"Obama could probably eat a baby in the Rose Garden on camera and his zombies would cheer."
landusepbb is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.