![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Tin Bender
Join Date: Feb 2000
Member # 294
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 3,071
|
Below is a one page appeal on the Sierra Nevada Framework. Please print out
a copy and send one to the address below and another to: Regional Forester, USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region 1323 Club Drive Vallejo CA 94592. We need to get as many appeals in as possible the deadline is it has to be postmarked by April 17, 2001. Thank for your help on this important issue. I will be filing an full appeal on behalf of CA4WDC also. Thanks Don Klusman Chief USDA Forest Service Attn: Appeals - Barbara Timberlake (Mail Stop 1104) P.O. Box 96090 Washington, DC 20090-6090 Dear Chief: I do hereby appeal the Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS). This appeal is filed in accordance with 36 CFR 217. I believe the FEIS illegal. This is partly based on a recent (April 5, 2001) court decision against the USFS Roadless Rule (Kooteni Tribe et al. v. Ann Veneman, USFS et al). US District Judge Edward Lodge said that there was strong evidence that the process did not produce a coherent proposal or meaningful dialogue and that the end result was predetermined. The judge said that the rule violated the National Environmental Policy Act. I believe the FEIS suffers from many of the roadless rule's legal deficiencies. The willful omission of the recreation issue is reason alone for me to ask the agency to withdraw the current document and start a process that includes the topic of recreation. Nowhere in the document does it describe an "active" effort on the part of the agency to "manage" the recreational infrastructure. Although the Record of Decision claims to reaffirm that providing recreational opportunities is one of the Forest Service's major missions, the passive management direction of the FEIS will certainly doom many dispersed and developed recreation activities. Developed and dispersed recreation are also at risk from agenda driven advocates in the agency, the administration, or Congress because by simply not funding certain studies or research required by the FEIS -- equestrian, OHV, mountain biking, downhill skiing, cabin egress and ingress, and permitted commercial ventures may be closed down because of a lack of funding or agency/administration priority. Remand back the FEIS to the Forest Service the until legal deficiencies are corrected. Sincerely, ------------------ www.axlesnappers.com Jeep, yellow |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Pirate4x4 Addict!
Join Date: Mar 2000
Member # 347
Location: Fair Oaks, CA
Posts: 10,087
|
This is the biggest single thing that challenges our California trails right now... if you only write one letter this year, make this that one.
Randii ------------------ Mongrel-ized Amigo Managing Editor, http://www.4x4wire.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
1962 YellowSubmarine
Join Date: Aug 2000
Member # 1494
Location: The Land Of The Free, Thanks To The Brave!
Posts: 8,288
|
<FONT COLOR="Yellow">This MUST BE POSTMARKED BY TUESDAY....DO IT NOW!!....</FONT c>
------------------ <FONT COLOR="yellow">"Its a Wheelbase Thing, Your Jeep Wouldn't Understand"</FONT c> Peter S. Di Primo V.P. - Ventura County Axle Snappers 4WDC www.axlesnappers.com Yellowsub1962@aol.com |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|