![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read | Premium Memberships | Auto Loans |
![]() |
|
|
Share |
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Member # 21338
Location: Auburn, CA
Posts: 587
|
Front ford 9"/44 Hybrid
Anyone seen a good write-up on a ford 9"/44 hybrid? I've found a variety of mog9 and 44/30 pages but nothing as specific as what I'm looking for. I'm not to experienced with front axles so I figure I can get some experience building this hybrid for my CJ.
__________________
[url]http://webspace.webring.com/people/dg/geer_hed/test/test_frames.html[/url] [url]http://www.jeeptech.com/wiki/index.php/Main[/url] [url]http://77cj.littlekeylime.com/Links/Links.htm[/url] [url]http://www.jeepaholics.com/tech/tech.htm[/url] [url]http://www.jeepaholics.com/tech/bambar[/url] [url]http://www.oregonbushhackers.org/tech/cj_specs.shtml[/url] |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2000
Member # 62
Location: Omaha NE
Posts: 5,992
|
seriously why bother? the weak point of the dana 44 is the axle shafts and U-joints so building a hybrid would just cost money and time. A worth while hybrid would be a 9"/60 or 9"/mog like you mentioned.
__________________
Jeff Neves |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Member # 22966
Location: Bainbridge, OH
Posts: 269
|
Unless you plan on running a HP9", bu then why not just find a HP D44? I see no real benefit in going a D44/9" route. Go with a 9" center section with 31 spline shafts and D60 outers, IMO.
__________________
1967 CJ5, 1992 YJ, 2000 XJ, 2006 Commander |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2000
Member # 62
Location: Omaha NE
Posts: 5,992
|
Quote:
__________________
Jeff Neves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Member # 21338
Location: Auburn, CA
Posts: 587
|
going 9 because I'm going to run a 9" rear.. just wanna keep it similar. The clearance weight and strength of the 9 is what has sold me. a 9 with 1/2 ton knuckles seems reasonanable under my 3000 lb CJ. The 60 ends are friggin huge, I'm all for a beefy setup but 60 ends almost teater on overkill. "almost"The mog9 is awsome, If I had the money I'd probobly go that route. might still go with a 69 or the mog9
__________________
[url]http://webspace.webring.com/people/dg/geer_hed/test/test_frames.html[/url] [url]http://www.jeeptech.com/wiki/index.php/Main[/url] [url]http://77cj.littlekeylime.com/Links/Links.htm[/url] [url]http://www.jeepaholics.com/tech/tech.htm[/url] [url]http://www.jeepaholics.com/tech/bambar[/url] [url]http://www.oregonbushhackers.org/tech/cj_specs.shtml[/url] |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Fawkin Fordhead
|
9"? Clearance? WTF are you smoking?
__________________
96 F350 XL CC PSD/5 speed 4x4... New Tow pig in the making 96 F250 XLT Ex Cab PSD/5 speed 4x4... DD/Tow Pig 92 W250 LE, CTD/5 speed 4x4, tow pig/DD/snow pushin pig 86 F250... 460/T19/1345/D60/welded 10.25, 44 Boggers, reg cab, some junk... Build |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Zeus of the Sluice
|
Hp 44 dude. Way more work than its worth just to have the same front/rear axles. The rc 44 would be just as strong for your app anyway. But if you reeeally want to do this, just do it like you would do a 60/9, but maybe use some of thems new 33 spline 44 axles?
__________________
In vino veritas 70 turbocharged 351w fastback mustang 73 linked 5.8efi Bronco 99 QCLB 4x4 twin'd cummins on meth. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2000
Member # 62
Location: Omaha NE
Posts: 5,992
|
Quote:
PS: unless its an all out rock buggy I highly doupt your CJ is 3000lbs, most trail ready jeeps way in closer to 4k... and if yours is that custom your probably getting it hard enough to need the dana 60 knuckles and 35 spline front shafts.
__________________
Jeff Neves |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|