![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
A fucking killer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Member # 7334
Location: Infernal Region
Posts: 2,174
|
Pirates of the Caribbean 3: The Waste of Time
Went and saw this late last night. What a cluster fuck of a movie.
The whole thing is just like spiderman 3: a fucktastic way to wrap up every storyline. The CGI is cool, but some of it is unbelievable in the wrong way. I found it to be a tragic attempt by Hollyweird to once again milk every dime out of a franchise. Only one fight scene is cool. there are so many things that happen that you roll your eyes at you think you're reading an I'm a n00b! First post!" thread. Steer clear of this reef, mates. There be cocksuckers making this movie.
__________________
Fuck you Love, -zakk |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Member # 12578
Location: Sun City, AZ
Posts: 573
|
Well I fell asleep in the theatre during the second one so I'll be saying no-thank-you to seeing this one. Thanks for confirming my suspicions about it.
__________________
Eric / `--'> < [] []////////|:::} \_.--.> "I want to depart this world the same way I arrived; screaming and covered in someone else's blood" |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
|
I was looking at the movie listings as we have some downtime this weekend and havent been to the theater since Night at the Museum.
I found it to be interesting that in a 12plex, they are playing exactly 4 movies: 3 of which are the third of a series. (Fairly ironic, dont remember that happening before) Shrek 3 Spidey 3 PotC 3 and Bug s the last, (wait for DVD) So, of the third installment flicks, do any of them NOT suck? Should I just skip the theater and wait for DVD like I do with 95% of the movies out these days?
__________________
Keith "Fuck em... they can eat a bowl of dicks for all I care!" - KE ______ "Bowl of dicks?" - MB "Yep, bowl of dicks!" - KE ______ "Damn thats a regular cornucopia of cock!" - MB |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Traffic Ninja
Join Date: Mar 2005
Member # 44662
Location: In a house!
Posts: 2,957
|
Quote:
__________________
A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul. - George Bernard Shaw |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
i think not
Join Date: Jun 2001
Member # 5433
Location: San Mexico, Ca.
Posts: 6,829
|
i saw the first one some time ago - meh - not too bad - good thing it was on VHS at someone elses expense.
don't see how 2 and/or 3 could be any better, considering what movie makers do with other sequels. movie "3" of anything fully brings the dookie.
__________________
What are we supposed to do with nature... just look at it? |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
|
Liked the first one, hated the second, third was ok. How do kids follow these movies?
__________________
-Brian 1 ton yoda I make nerd sexy |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
|
I happened to like:
Back to the Future 3 Return of the Jedi Revenge of the Sith Rocky III Terminator 3 Return of the King sucked (not the whole thing, but the ending... we shouted "Fuck, get in the damned boat, Frodo!" Was on the fence for X-3 but WTF do I know. So, Zakk, are you saying that Spidey sucked as well? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2000
Member # 377
Location: Evergreen, CO
Posts: 396
|
The first one was pretty damn cool. I have to admit I was pleasantly surprised by it. The second one was alright in a bordering on ghey, more than bordering on good. I have low expectations for the third one and will probably wait for DVD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
Did you read the book?
__________________
[QUOTE=moveaside]I'm not into blonde white girls. I like asians they look like little boys.:cool2;[QUOTE] I wont cast the first stone or leave the first mark but I will leave a lasting impression Buy stuff from [url]www.ruffstuffspecialties.com[[url] and [url]www.aa-fab.com[[url] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Member # 9614
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 932
|
I read the book, several times, am essentially a Tolkien geek, have tolerance for drawn-out stories, and at that point in the movie even I wanted him to just get on the fucking boat!
__________________
[url="http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?p=10154905#post10154905"]Trading stuff[/url] |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
I'm a little teapot.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Member # 44480
Location: Kalispell, MT
Posts: 6,183
|
What book?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
I'm your huckleberry
|
I stopped going into movies expecting every one to be amazing, and going for sheer entertainment value. I seem to enjoy myself more now that I go for fun. If it happens to be good, added bonus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2000
Member # 377
Location: Evergreen, CO
Posts: 396
|
Return of the King sucked (not the whole thing, but the ending... we shouted "Fuck, get in the damned boat, Frodo!"
Yeah, I definitely agree there! The whole Rings trilogy was pretty awesome, but it could of been absolutely amazing if they had chopped at least 30-45minutes off of the first 2 films and probably an hour off of the 3rd. I know they wanted it to be an epic style trilogy, but damn! You could take 2-3 hours out of it and it wouldn't lose anything. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
|
Well yeah me too. But they cant just change the ending!
__________________
[QUOTE=moveaside]I'm not into blonde white girls. I like asians they look like little boys.:cool2;[QUOTE] I wont cast the first stone or leave the first mark but I will leave a lasting impression Buy stuff from [url]www.ruffstuffspecialties.com[[url] and [url]www.aa-fab.com[[url] |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Member # 9614
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 932
|
Why not? They just changed or invented whole other parts of the story.
__________________
[url="http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?p=10154905#post10154905"]Trading stuff[/url] |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Member # 5832
Posts: 3,827
|
I despised the movies versus the books
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
I'm a little angel
|
Quote:
Hobbit Lover: Hey faggot, Sam and Frodo aren't gay! Their hobbits! Randal Graves: And then after the Frodo and Sam suckfest, just before the credits roll, Sam straight up fucking bricks in Frodo's mouth. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Member # 7354
Location: Rocklin, CA
Posts: 2,203
|
Quote:
__________________
If you are not pissed off, you are not paying attention. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Registered User
|
My girlfriend is dragging me to see this lame flick. The second one was marginal at best, so I have pretty low expectations for the third. The worst part is that she's got tickets tonight and I know it's going to be crowded as hell and there's always a high concentration of morons to intelligent people out in public.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
I'm the momma
|
Zakk---you are high maintanence.
![]() All I require is that I am entertained. Spiderman 3 was entertaining. I liked it. I expect no more from POTC.
__________________
Tin BendersSAVE THE HAMMERS!!! Food fixes everything....except for my weight problem. ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2000
Member # 377
Location: Evergreen, CO
Posts: 396
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Registered User
|
Yes, thats why I was frustrated.. they drug the damned thing out too long!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Mine!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Member # 63664
Location: Lake Chuck, LA
Posts: 565
|
Whatever the third Kevin Smith movie was (Dogma?) kicked ass.
I also like the third Die Hard. And we're forgeting Indiana Jones also. Last edited by rfr002; 05-25-2007 at 01:29 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Registered User
|
I agree, on Die Hard, Indiana Jones...
3rd Kevin Smith was Chasing Amy. Dogma was 4, J&SBSB was 5
__________________
Keith "Fuck em... they can eat a bowl of dicks for all I care!" - KE ______ "Bowl of dicks?" - MB "Yep, bowl of dicks!" - KE ______ "Damn thats a regular cornucopia of cock!" - MB |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Registered User
|
They do third movies because the second one made money.
The problem with this last one is the CGI dependancy. See, the first one was nearly CGI free. Just the Black Pearl's crew was whizbang special effects. It was nicely written, with a few core charactures and depended on the actors, who came through well. Second one, they did more CGI. Not good CGI either. It was like Disney forgot to upgrade their computers. The storyline was not that strong, some scenes were not needed and pure fluff, and some of the charactures didn't come through well. I haven't seen the third one but here is my prediction: Completely CGI addicted. Bloated with charactures that are not all that necessary. Land fight scenes over sailing fight scenes...making it more of a Kung Fu movie. Oversized CGI sets that the actors don't quite mesh with. Everything but the kitchen sink thrown in to keep the focus group happy. No real storyline. How'd I do? ps...in the first movie, the last fight scene at the gallows was waaaaaaaay too choreographed. It looked like a Bloom/Depp ballet. I still try to figure out which one is the ballerina in that pas deux.
__________________
Crickett #275 in the Great PBB Virtual Rally for the Hammers. Last edited by qwiksilver; 05-25-2007 at 02:03 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|