Pirate4x4.Com Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Pirate4x4.Com Bulletin Board > General Tech > General 4x4 Discussion

Reply
 
Share Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-31-2007, 06:29 AM   #1
rfr002
Mine!
 
rfr002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Member # 63664
Location: Lake Chuck, LA
Posts: 565
Which Would You Pick: 6.0L or 8.1L

Since I've finally decided that I'm tired of being cramped in my current rig (and I would like 4 seats anyway) I've decided to start planning for a new vehicle. It'll be a 4 seater (i.e. big heavy bastard) with a 4L80E, Atlas 4sp, Rockwells, and either 47's or 49's.

My question is what engine I should be looking for. I can't really decide between the 6.0L and the 8.1L. The 8.1 has a good bit more torque from the factory but doesn't seem to have a whole lot of aftermarket support for power upgrades. The 6.0 has less power from the factory but has a ton of aftermarket support.

Post up some pros and cons.
__________________
Rob

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam24462 View Post
I'm in California....Duh! We are little gayer around these parts.

Last edited by rfr002; 08-31-2007 at 06:29 AM.
rfr002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 06:34 AM   #2
SPEEDCRAVIN
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Member # 30432
Location: Ozarks (NWA)
Posts: 1,571
You stated the biggest concern I would have about aftermaket parts. You might consider stock parts availability also. Im betting you willbe able to find something simple like a water pump much easier for the 6.0 that the 8.1 out in a small town on a week long wheeling trip...

besides I love the 6.0s that I have had!!!

Oh and what is the differance in weight? It sounds like that is not much of an issue for you but I think about it every time I (just cant quit make an obstical) "maybe if I was just 500 to 600 lbs lighter???"

Just my .02, JOSH
__________________
[B][SIZE="5"][COLOR="Blue"]WWW.ANVILRECOVERY.COM[/COLOR][/SIZE][/B]

GOT TULIP? yep and he's GOT HIPPIE!!!

[SIZE="3"]CHECK OUT MY SHOP BUILD WITH APARTMENT[/SIZE] [url]http://pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=589523[/url]
SPEEDCRAVIN is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 08-31-2007, 07:08 AM   #3
Spike5421
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Member # 10411
Location: Oahu, Hawaii
Posts: 158
Send a message via AIM to Spike5421
I agree with weight comment. If you think your truggy will weigh quite a bit I would go with the 8.1L because it will pull you around without hesitation. I am sure with the right gearing 6.0L will be fine. I would make a cost comparison also on some basic replacement parts. Nobody likes to be surprised by a overly expensive part.
__________________
82 Cj7 (SOLD)
'04 4wd Taco, S/C, Allpro 3.5", 4.88 gears, ARB bumper, Warn, rocker guards.
Spike5421 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 07:35 AM   #4
ProjectGoat
Registered User
 
ProjectGoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Member # 96193
Location: Alvin, TX
Posts: 463
Quote:
Originally Posted by rfr002 View Post
Since I've finally decided that I'm tired of being cramped in my current rig (and I would like 4 seats anyway) I've decided to start planning for a new vehicle. It'll be a 4 seater (i.e. big heavy bastard) with a 4L80E, Atlas 4sp, Rockwells, and either 47's or 49's.

My question is what engine I should be looking for. I can't really decide between the 6.0L and the 8.1L. The 8.1 has a good bit more torque from the factory but doesn't seem to have a whole lot of aftermarket support for power upgrades. The 6.0 has less power from the factory but has a ton of aftermarket support.

Post up some pros and cons.


Either motor will work. With the heavy rig like that, the 8.1 will come in handy, but as mentioned with the right gearing the 6.0 would work. Also, as mentioned, the aftermarket is readily available for the 6.0, so can be brought up to more HP/TQ for some $$$$. Or, you can look at it like this, your rig will be heavy enough as it is, why add more weight with the 8.1? Or, you may not be concerned with an extra 75-100 LBS or so the motor will bring. I would not worry about a part failing and the local parts store having it.....if they have it for 6.0. they will have it for the 8.1. And, besides, when was the last time you actually had a part fail on the motor, and be near a parts store anyway If you are like me, it happens when I am between towns OR after hours and they are closed
__________________
[FONT="Arial Black"][SIZE="2"][COLOR="Silver"]ProjectGoat: '03 QC DRW NV5600 Cummins 508HP/1008TQ 2WD being converted to 4WD[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT]

[FONT="Palatino Linotype"][SIZE="4"][COLOR="RoyalBlue"]"Hell hath no fury like a Pirate member insulted"[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT]

[FONT="Garamond"][SIZE="5"][COLOR="Red"]God Speed Jason: My Truck+Mogs=Build Time[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT]

Last edited by ProjectGoat; 08-31-2007 at 07:36 AM.
ProjectGoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 07:52 AM   #5
ramv
Zeus of the Sluice
 
Join Date: May 2002
Member # 11921
Location: Denver
Posts: 2,557
In a tow rig/dd I would vote 8.1 for sure. ( I love mine, better mileage aroudn town then 6.0s I have had).

For a wheelin rig I have never been sold on the giant heavy motors. However I mainly do rocks. My 6500+lb truck runs an almost stock 5.9 (~250 hp/350 ft-lb torque) and has plenty of juice with the right gear (which you will have with a 4 spd T-case).

The 6.0 is more of a screamer which is nice. Stock 8.1s are done about 4500 rpm, but have some more if retuned.

If its a chugging through deep mud kind of a rig, the big block is probably happier. If its a rock crawler or even high speed rig, I think all the aftermarket parts would make the 6.0 a great choice. However I would do which ever one was a better deal.

I don't think parts availibilty should be too bad. Its not an exotic motor. (2001-2007 burbs, Avs and Pickups had them, as did most base model medium duty GMC trucks)
__________________
My build thread: http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=508537

Last edited by ramv; 08-31-2007 at 07:54 AM.
ramv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 08:09 AM   #6
Fl-Krawler
Registered User
 
Fl-Krawler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Member # 47337
Posts: 1,124
i would choose the 6.0L b/c its a smaller package so it will be easier to fit.i have a heavy rockwelled buggy on 49"(5700lbs) but with a 3.0 atlas and LT-1 under the hood it turns the iroks with no troubles. i dont think a 6.0 would have any trouble either


Last edited by Fl-Krawler; 08-31-2007 at 08:10 AM.
Fl-Krawler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 11:45 AM   #7
rfr002
Mine!
 
rfr002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Member # 63664
Location: Lake Chuck, LA
Posts: 565
Forgot to put it in the original post:

This vehicle will be mostly for rock crawling (east coast stuff).

The engine will be left stock for awhile until the funds come around for the mods.

Weight isn't a big concern but I don't want an extra 200lbs for no reason.
__________________
Rob

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam24462 View Post
I'm in California....Duh! We are little gayer around these parts.
rfr002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 11:53 AM   #8
MadRam
Rock God
 
MadRam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Member # 20833
Location: Tuscaloosa, AL
Posts: 1,330
Well I am goin from a Supercharged LT1 to a 8.1l. There are plenty of after market parts out there for the 8.1. I have been around a couple of buggies with the 8.1 and they seem to work really well. Plus for some reason Big Blocks and Rockwells just go together.
MadRam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 12:03 PM   #9
PILLSBURY
Wheeler
 
PILLSBURY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Member # 43067
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 290
6.0 or 8.1???

Well what are some of the mods you all would do to the 6.0 or 8.1 and how would it help and how much does it cost to tune and beef up those new motors? What mods to you think are a must??
__________________
Buggy Build in Progress. 4 Wheeling ROCKS!!!

WWW.SPEEDENGINEERINGANDDYNO.COM
PILLSBURY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 12:43 PM   #10
burtv
HARD ROCK VEGAS
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Member # 83644
Posts: 380
Everybody has good opinions above, mine is always go for the power big block and build from there.
burtv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 01:01 PM   #11
CSmith
Registered User
 
CSmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Member # 31658
Location: Spokane,WA
Posts: 442
6.0, Lighter, almost as much power, more common, better fuel economy, less oil consumption.
__________________
'77 Scout Terra, Extended Cab, SOA, 4bt Cummins, ZF 5 speed, NP205
CSmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 02:00 PM   #12
ramv
Zeus of the Sluice
 
Join Date: May 2002
Member # 11921
Location: Denver
Posts: 2,557
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSmith View Post
, less oil consumption.

The 8.1s that used oil were early models. If the TSB is performed or a later model is used their oil consumption is minimal. (I use 1 qt in maybe 5000 miles towing)
__________________
My build thread: http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=508537
ramv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 02:12 PM   #13
nhgpnut
registered user
 
nhgpnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Member # 42521
Location: Allover,USA & NH
Posts: 1,092
Send a message via AIM to nhgpnut Send a message via Yahoo to nhgpnut
Hands down the 8.1. Big blocks and rockwells are like ice cream and apple pie,they go great together. I'll take a 300 hp big block over a 400hp small block every time in this situation. The torque is what moves the vehicle. I've seen small blocks that were not that impressive but i can't remember the last unimpressive big block. My .02
__________________
If you have it, a truck brought it. Without trucks,you would be naked and hungry.
Tellico rally post#592
nhgpnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 02:31 PM   #14
comeonstart
Registered User
 
comeonstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Member # 49939
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 2,502
Send a message via AIM to comeonstart
6.0 I think have a larger RPM range would be a advantage. I also have yet to see an 8.1 for sale so parts may be a little pricy.
__________________
Obama - Just another black man living in government housing
comeonstart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 02:40 PM   #15
im84
Registered User
 
im84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Member # 40561
Posts: 407
8.1

I was in the same situation you are in. Sold the 2 seat rig in order to build a 4 seater. My rig is heavy already and it's not even close to done. I chose the 8.1 just because. I've got rockwells, 52's, doubler, 4 seats, 142" wheelbase. The 8.1 just went with the rest of the rig. Weight should'nt be an issue to a certain point when building a rig like this. IMO
__________________
8.1 vortec,OEM Rocks,54 Claws,143"WB,4seats,is it big and heavy,yes,do I care, no
im84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 02:43 PM   #16
redneckengineered
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Member # 21215
Location: Tennessee...The land of high horsepower and low IQ
Posts: 2,832
When was the last time you heard someone wish they had less displacement?
redneckengineered is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 03:43 PM   #17
odin544
Registered User
 
odin544's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Member # 29622
Location: Kennewick, Washington
Posts: 1,712
hmm... 8.1 for me.
__________________
'80 K10 CREWCAB,8.1L BBC,4L80E/NP205,D60/14FF,4.88's,38.5's
[URL="http://pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=598547"][SIZE="4"]Crew Cab "Mater" Build[/SIZE][/URL]
odin544 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 03:48 PM   #18
rfr002
Mine!
 
rfr002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Member # 63664
Location: Lake Chuck, LA
Posts: 565
Quote:
Originally Posted by redneckengineered View Post
When was the last time you heard someone wish they had less displacement?
Of all the helpful things said so far, this hits home the most.
__________________
Rob

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam24462 View Post
I'm in California....Duh! We are little gayer around these parts.
rfr002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 03:52 PM   #19
Joshinator
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Member # 43040
Location: Sulphur Louisiana
Posts: 446
Quote:
Originally Posted by redneckengineered View Post
When was the last time you heard someone wish they had less displacement?
Thats the truth right there!! Besides, why half step when youre planning on big ole axles, big ole tires, big ole buggy... you see where im going.
__________________
95 S-10, one tons, 44's, 7lb pulley
Joshinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 05:48 PM   #20
RKCRAWLER
Simple man
 
RKCRAWLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Member # 13103
Location: Germantown,TN
Posts: 693
You know the saying......Theres NO replacement for displacement Big Block all the way!
__________________
Dang! 88MJ, 02 Dodge 2500
RKCRAWLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 05:54 PM   #21
THachiya
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Member # 47888
Location: Porkopolis, USA
Posts: 772
If weight is not a problem and there is no replacement for displacement, I would go with a RamJet 502. You get both a big block and lots of after market support. Helps when you need headers, oil pans, etc. to pull it off.

Good luck!
__________________
WTF-J - WTF gives you freedom. Freedom brings opportunity. Opportunity makes your future.
THachiya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 06:22 PM   #22
odin544
Registered User
 
odin544's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Member # 29622
Location: Kennewick, Washington
Posts: 1,712
why go with a RJ 502? Its about 4 times the expense. And for what? 7ci?
__________________
'80 K10 CREWCAB,8.1L BBC,4L80E/NP205,D60/14FF,4.88's,38.5's
[URL="http://pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=598547"][SIZE="4"]Crew Cab "Mater" Build[/SIZE][/URL]
odin544 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 06:34 PM   #23
dukguy
Registered User
 
dukguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Member # 29450
Location: houston,tx
Posts: 703
PM X-Rated and see what he thinks of his 8.1L.

Last edited by dukguy; 08-31-2007 at 06:35 PM.
dukguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 07:08 PM   #24
ramv
Zeus of the Sluice
 
Join Date: May 2002
Member # 11921
Location: Denver
Posts: 2,557
Quote:
Originally Posted by odin544 View Post
why go with a RJ 502? Its about 4 times the expense. And for what? 7ci?
6 cubic inches. (8.1 is 496)

The 502 is based on the 454/396/427 (car) block. So aftermarket has been around forever. The 8.1 is a tall deck block. The 572 is based on the 8.1 block. The 8.1 should be a better mileage/torque design (longer stroke then a 502) but the ramjet spins up fast and has a 565 ft-lb torque peak.

However buying a complete engine from the junkyard, the 8.1 or 6.0 or an LSX for that matter, is going to be a much cheaper unit.

,
__________________
My build thread: http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=508537
ramv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 07:53 PM   #25
powdr7
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Member # 26188
Location: The 'Couve, WA
Posts: 1,203
If you want to buildthe motor down the road, 6.0. I agree about parts being readily available also, and the after market on the 6.0 kills the 8.1.

I would look at it this way.

Cost, HP/TQ & LBS of 6.0.
Cost, HP/TQ & LBS of 8.1.

Then see how much after market parts are, and stock parts at that. What if you break something on the 8.1, how much is that part, and is it easy to get from any ole store in the shit hole towns where you're wheeling. Same with the 6.0.

I have a semi built LS1, and I'll be throwing out around 450 HP & 450 TQ, for not much money at all.
__________________
CRAWL - Back in action
powdr7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply





Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©1998 - 2010 Pirate Media Group