![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Member # 6054
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 2,062
|
swapping a chevy 6.0 into and older truck
anyone done this, or have a place i can read up more about it, i have and 87 gmc 2500 that i love and dont want to sell, but i need more power ive read an article in a magazine about it and it doesnt look hard, found the motor complete for 2500 bucks but what about wiring,cooling and flexplate issues. If anyone has any advice let me know
thanks Ben |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Member # 11921
Location: Denver
Posts: 3,133
|
David Kennedy did this on his original 6.2 K5. Try emailing him, I'm sure he would share.
__________________
My build thread: [url]http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=508537[/url] |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Member # 43066
Location: ☣ Ohio, near Toledo
Posts: 137
|
Put a carb on it
Performer RPM LS1 includes a wiring harness and unique electronic Timing Control Module made by MSD® which works with OE sensors to fire the coil-on-plug ignition system and offers a choice of three timing curves. A special throttle and trans bracket that works with 700R-4 and Turbo 350 transmissions is included, making the LS1 engine an easy retro-fit into any muscle car, street rod or marine application. http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive/man_chevy_ls1.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
[QUOTE=ESPEED]Put a carb on it[QUOTE]
And why would you ever want to do that? IMO, one of the best things that happened to cars in the last 15 years has been the evolution of EFI. Especially in something that you would want to be a daily driver or tow vehicle. Now, if EFI isn't a consideration, slapping a carb on it may be a quicker and cheaper way to get it done. It certainly wouldn't be the way I would go though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
Read up about newer LSI swaps, anything that has coil tech, get a good base of knowledge, you mention cooling, wiring, etc - find a complete motor, intake to exhaust with all wiring, that way you start ahead of the game. Call your common sources for engine swaps and talk to them about general headaches so you know what to expect. Remember, GM is GM but 80's truck '00 motor, there are changes but not that much so take it easy and get as much of the parts before you touch the current truck.
Good luck! I would like to see it done - 6.0/4L80/NP205 in a older 3+3, killer.
__________________
[COLOR=DarkOrange][I]I really hope that God has the capacity for forgiveness that Christians claim, because I am going to test the absolute outer limits.[/I][/COLOR] |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2000
Member # 603
Location: Missouri, USA
Posts: 14,198
|
I can't really offer anything to help in the swap except to say that my previous truck had a TBI 350 & the current on has a 6.0. As much as I liked that old 350, I can fully understand your desire to have the 6.0. It's literally night & day. Good luck
![]() TEX
__________________
www.probog.com Thanks to: www.heiseroil.com Extreme Performance www.kmelectronics.com Bear Creek Auto Recyclers www.svrehorsepower.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Member # 43066
Location: ☣ Ohio, near Toledo
Posts: 137
|
Why would someone want to put a carb on it?
“offering maximum power and a broad torque curve from 1500 to 6500 rpm. This manifold made 410 hp and 418 ft/lbs. of torque in dyno tests with our matching cam #2215 and Performer Series carb #1413. “(from the link that I provided) Personally I would run it with the fuel injection. I just wanted to offer this as an alternative for someone who may not have access to factory wiring schematics or want to deal with the extra work involved. Its simplicity is appealing to me however as it eliminates numerous expensive sensors and it MAY be possible to use this with the present fuel system by adding a regulator at the carb (assuming you have a TBI setup now @ 15psi) instead of a new high pressure system. Note also that the intake is not an inexpensive option (approximately $700 from Jegs) the biggest problems Kennedy had if I remember the article correctly was the motor mounts and possibly some cross member interference. david.kennedy@primedia.com FOUND IT Part 1 http://www.4wheeloffroad.com/brandpa...eng/index.html Part 2 http://www.4wheeloffroad.com/brandpa..._k5/index.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Member # 31228
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 716
|
Quote:
I was thinking the same but with an 8.1
__________________
'68 scout 800, TPI 383/700r4 D44's '66 K20 383/400/205 60/14 '62 nova 406/th350. 11.40's @ 118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Rock God
Join Date: May 2001
Member # 4406
Location: Denver
Posts: 2,336
|
If you do the swap, I would try to find the 345 hp version from the Escalade/Denali/SS. On a recent trip we had one truck with the regular truck version, and one with the Denali version, and there was a noticable difference.
Pete
__________________
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways , beer in hand, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOW, what a ride." |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
Yeah!! I wasnt thinking straight. But then again a ramjet 502 would be an easier swap at that point or custom 572.
__________________
[COLOR=DarkOrange][I]I really hope that God has the capacity for forgiveness that Christians claim, because I am going to test the absolute outer limits.[/I][/COLOR] |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|