![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Member # 28116
Location: Tuckerton, NJ
Posts: 70
|
What octane for FJ
My friend just bought an FJ Cruiser and he just read where he needs 91 octane. Are you owners all using the 91 Octane in your trucks. If not could there be long term issues?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Cranky Moderator
|
RTFM !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
85 Toy Xtracab "I DON'T want to understand !!" Click here to donate to the Rubicon Trail Foundation Rubicon Trail Foundation "Wow this is unbelievable" 2013 Cantina for the 'Con supporters! WIN a fully built Toyota pickup at Cantina 2013 Davez Off Road and Trail Gear are supporting Rubicon Trail Foundation We have returning Platinum sponsors for Cantina 2013 with Raceline Wheels and Falken Tires!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Member # 72108
Posts: 362
|
You need to use the 91. If you you could develop a knock.
__________________
94 jeep zj 5.2 - dana 60 35 spline rear - dana 44 front - full arbs - 37 MTRs 91 samurai in progress with 2.0, toy trans, dual t-case and ??? axels. 95 in restro progress with 16V and all new |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Member # 13698
Location: Pollock Pines
Posts: 112
|
I use 87 exclusively and have towed my trail rig over the Tehachapi for the Hammers without so much as a ping or knock. The only drawback to using 87 is that you will not get the full advertised horsepower. Like the tech bulletin says....no big deal.
__________________
...just call me Radio. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Member # 29016
Location: galt ca, because i wanted my own backyard
Posts: 15,354
|
ALL efi and "new" vehicles say that they "need" 91 or better. its b.s. and your rig, any rig will run fine on 87.
now i do notice a markable decrease in mpg in my 01 vw wagon, 26-27 on 87 and 30-31 on 91 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
boulder buddha
Join Date: Mar 2001
Member # 3886
Location: southern oregon
Posts: 3,600
|
well the 50 miles youd lose using regular costs you more than the additional $4 on fill up
say on 87 octane 13 mpg x 19 gals = 247 miles say on 92 octane 16 mpg x 19 gals = 304 miles difference of 50 - 60 miles even at 15 mpg thats 3 to 4 gals and at 3$ a gal thats 9-12$ fillup diff of 0.20 per gallon 19 x 0.20 = $3.8 gee its totally worth the $4 you save at the pump for the $12 you lose out tha back door cheap ass jokers ![]() i run 92 in my POS 22RE for the same reason doesnt anyone remember the days of 101 octane...it would sure be nice if the assholes would let us have some decent fuel back. or better yet come up with something better than the allmighty 25% efficient gasoline
__________________
hold this... Last edited by gnob; 08-12-2007 at 11:07 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Member # 3498
Location: Reseda, CA
Posts: 12
|
You only get the benifit of higher octane gas in an engine that's built to use it, ie, higher compression. Modern high compression engines you can usualy go to a lower octane without knocking because the computers will adjust the timing for you, at a cost of lower horsepower. But taking an engine that's low compression and built for 87 won't get you a dang thing runing 91 or even 101.. Remember, higher octane gas burns SLOWER, not faster.. lower octane gas burns faster. Higer octane prevents preigntion in high compression engines by burning and igniting slower. It's the higher compression of the engine running 91 octane that gets you more power, not the octane itself. Octane does not=more power by itself.. The most you could do with high octane in a normal engine is advance timming a bit, but you are not going to get anywhere near the power increase of a higher compression engine built for 91 or even race enignes built for 100+. You are wasting money running 91 in anything but an engine that is built for higher octane.
But your formula is basicaly correct.. higher 91 octane in the FJ which has an engine that is built for it will get you optimum power and range. If you run 87 the computer detunes the engine to prevent preignition/knock with the faster burning gas, but as a result you get less power and less range - as stated in the memo from toyota "Shows a rating of 239 HP which was achived using premium unleaded fuel - please note that this rating may be reduced using non-premium fuel" Older cars can not adjust their timing computers as much if even at all so they were much more sensitive to the octane. A high compression power engine could not be run on lower octane without it being manualy detuned for it...
__________________
-David Hale 2007 FJC, slightly modified. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Member # 13698
Location: Pollock Pines
Posts: 112
|
Quote:
![]() Where did you get you numbers from? I'm getting 17 or better on 87 octane. If what your saying is true then I'll switch to 92, but I'm just not finding it to be true in my limited search on the topic: (read 2nd paragraph in the first link) http://ask.cars.com/2007/07/premium-gasolin.html http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/cons...tos/aut12.shtm Just for the hell of it I'll run a few tanks of 92 through to see if it works. I'm not a cheap ass joker, I just don't like paying extra if there's no benefit. Besides, based on your calculations you would be the cheap-ass joker in this scenario since your actually paying less per mile than I do...
__________________
...just call me Radio. Last edited by 12_Volt_Dave; 08-13-2007 at 10:04 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Member # 11359
Location: The Promised Land
Posts: 359
|
I've filled my FJ with premium exactly once in my 14 months of ownership and on highway get about 19-20 mpg if I keep my foot out of it. No pinging, etc.
The one time I did use premium, the difference in power was not perceptible. Simon
__________________
Fornicate my redemption. I recede to my own bowels! -Oswald Bates |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
boulder buddha
Join Date: Mar 2001
Member # 3886
Location: southern oregon
Posts: 3,600
|
Quote:
i dont run regular simply based on the fact the 4runner runs like shit on it. you definately drop mpg on lower octane. i just was trying to prove a point, that when you think youre saving you arent always saving. buying shitty gas cost more than just mileage, it creates extra wear on the rig, doesnt burn as clean which leads to build up, lost power, and eventual burnt valves etc. regardless of what that bulletin says, toyota recommends it for a reason. and even if you drop only 1 mpg on 19 gallons thats 19 miles, equates essentially to one gallon or the three bucks you thought you saved on the front. and my peace of mind is worth at least 3 bucks
__________________
hold this... Last edited by gnob; 08-15-2007 at 05:30 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Member # 76931
Posts: 3
|
Toyota recomends 91 octane because that was the fuel used when the engine was dyno tested. You can use any grade of regular gasoline with a minimal loss of HP. or Torque. They recomend 91 to meet published fugures.
Last edited by MoSun; 08-17-2007 at 12:23 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Member # 115756
Posts: 1
|
From the horses mouth...
I work in a Toyota auto plant, this was what an engineer told me. The FJ Cruiser engine/power train is basically the same as the one in the Tacoma and 4-Runner, a 4.0L V6 bolted on to an auto or manual trans. So why do the 4-runner and tacoma require only 87 octane? Simple, they were introduced before the 2007 model year as new models and therefore Toyota didn't care if they where LEV II standard complient, the FJ however does have LEV II certification, but the only way it can do this is on 91 octane. Both engines have the same compression rating 10.0:1 so the "higher comprssion" argument goes out the window. So it's either 239 hp @ 5200 rpm or 236 hp @ 5200 rpm. Torque is 278 lb/ft @ 3800 rpm or 266 lb/ft @ 4000 rpm. Using 87 WILL NOT harm your engine. My FJ has been drinking 87 for about the last 3 months and I've seen no major difference in milage. My right foot is always the reason it drinks too much. So if you want the extra power put 91 in, want to save at the pump 87 is fine. Hope this helps!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|