What octane for FJ - Pirate4x4.Com : 4x4 and Off-Road Forum
 
Pirate4x4.Com : 4x4 and Off-Road Forum  

Go Back   Pirate4x4.Com : 4x4 and Off-Road Forum > Brand Specific Tech > Toyota - FJ Cruiser
Notices

Reply
 
Share Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-02-2007, 05:12 PM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Member # 28116
Location: Tuckerton, NJ
Posts: 70
What octane for FJ

My friend just bought an FJ Cruiser and he just read where he needs 91 octane. Are you owners all using the 91 Octane in your trucks. If not could there be long term issues?
MS3820 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 06:01 PM   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Member # 63828
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 737
I always use premium in mine.
Spotter's Wife is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 07-02-2007, 10:00 PM   #3 (permalink)
boulder buddha
 
gnob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Member # 3886
Location: southern oregon
Posts: 3,600
92

toyota calls for 91 for a reason.
high compression and hotter running.
and you save a whole $3 going to regular...
__________________
hold this...
gnob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2007, 05:56 PM   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Member # 28116
Location: Tuckerton, NJ
Posts: 70
thx I will relay the message.
MS3820 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2007, 11:39 PM   #5 (permalink)
Cranky Moderator
 
steveh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Member # 2026
Location: Placerville, CA USA
Posts: 6,650
Send a message via AIM to steveh
RTFM !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
85 Toy Xtracab
"I DON'T want to understand !!"
Click here to donate to the Rubicon Trail Foundation
Rubicon Trail Foundation
"Wow this is unbelievable"
2013 Cantina for the 'Con supporters!
WIN a fully built Toyota pickup at Cantina 2013
Davez Off Road and Trail Gear are supporting Rubicon Trail Foundation
We have returning Platinum sponsors for Cantina 2013 with Raceline Wheels and Falken Tires!!
steveh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2007, 08:31 AM   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
dwkremer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Member # 72108
Posts: 362
You need to use the 91. If you you could develop a knock.
__________________
94 jeep zj 5.2 - dana 60 35 spline rear - dana 44 front - full arbs - 37 MTRs

91 samurai in progress with 2.0, toy trans, dual t-case and ??? axels.

95 in restro progress with 16V and all new
dwkremer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2007, 11:48 AM   #7 (permalink)
Registered User
 
robertd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Member # 44086
Location: Newcastle, Ca
Posts: 242
I have been running 87 for months and no knocks, pings, or other problems....
robertd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2007, 05:49 PM   #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Member # 3498
Location: Reseda, CA
Posts: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveh View Post
RTFM !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Actually in this case the manual had an error...

__________________
-David Hale
2007 FJC, slightly modified.
vaud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2007, 06:55 PM   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
12_Volt_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Member # 13698
Location: Pollock Pines
Posts: 112
I use 87 exclusively and have towed my trail rig over the Tehachapi for the Hammers without so much as a ping or knock. The only drawback to using 87 is that you will not get the full advertised horsepower. Like the tech bulletin says....no big deal.
__________________
...just call me Radio.
12_Volt_Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2007, 07:21 PM   #10 (permalink)
Banned
 
trkklr77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Member # 29016
Location: galt ca, because i wanted my own backyard
Posts: 15,354
ALL efi and "new" vehicles say that they "need" 91 or better. its b.s. and your rig, any rig will run fine on 87.


now i do notice a markable decrease in mpg in my 01 vw wagon, 26-27 on 87 and 30-31 on 91
trkklr77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2007, 11:04 AM   #11 (permalink)
boulder buddha
 
gnob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Member # 3886
Location: southern oregon
Posts: 3,600
well the 50 miles youd lose using regular costs you more than the additional $4 on fill up

say on 87 octane 13 mpg x 19 gals = 247 miles
say on 92 octane 16 mpg x 19 gals = 304 miles

difference of 50 - 60 miles even at 15 mpg thats 3 to 4 gals and at 3$ a gal thats 9-12$

fillup diff of 0.20 per gallon 19 x 0.20 = $3.8

gee its totally worth the $4 you save at the pump for the $12 you lose out tha back door

cheap ass jokers


i run 92 in my POS 22RE for the same reason
doesnt anyone remember the days of 101 octane...it would sure be nice if the assholes would let us have some decent fuel back. or better yet come up with something better than the allmighty 25% efficient gasoline
__________________
hold this...

Last edited by gnob; 08-12-2007 at 11:07 AM.
gnob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2007, 05:35 PM   #12 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Member # 3498
Location: Reseda, CA
Posts: 12
You only get the benifit of higher octane gas in an engine that's built to use it, ie, higher compression. Modern high compression engines you can usualy go to a lower octane without knocking because the computers will adjust the timing for you, at a cost of lower horsepower. But taking an engine that's low compression and built for 87 won't get you a dang thing runing 91 or even 101.. Remember, higher octane gas burns SLOWER, not faster.. lower octane gas burns faster. Higer octane prevents preigntion in high compression engines by burning and igniting slower. It's the higher compression of the engine running 91 octane that gets you more power, not the octane itself. Octane does not=more power by itself.. The most you could do with high octane in a normal engine is advance timming a bit, but you are not going to get anywhere near the power increase of a higher compression engine built for 91 or even race enignes built for 100+. You are wasting money running 91 in anything but an engine that is built for higher octane.

But your formula is basicaly correct.. higher 91 octane in the FJ which has an engine that is built for it will get you optimum power and range. If you run 87 the computer detunes the engine to prevent preignition/knock with the faster burning gas, but as a result you get less power and less range - as stated in the memo from toyota "Shows a rating of 239 HP which was achived using premium unleaded fuel - please note that this rating may be reduced using non-premium fuel"

Older cars can not adjust their timing computers as much if even at all so they were much more sensitive to the octane. A high compression power engine could not be run on lower octane without it being manualy detuned for it...
__________________
-David Hale
2007 FJC, slightly modified.
vaud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2007, 09:49 PM   #13 (permalink)
Registered User
 
12_Volt_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Member # 13698
Location: Pollock Pines
Posts: 112
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnob View Post
well the 50 miles you'd lose using regular costs you more than the additional $4 on fill up

say on 87 octane 13 mpg x 19 gals = 247 miles
say on 92 octane 16 mpg x 19 gals = 304 miles

difference of 50 - 60 miles even at 15 mpg thats 3 to 4 gals and at 3$ a gal thats 9-12$

fillup diff of 0.20 per gallon 19 x 0.20 = $3.8

gee its totally worth the $4 you save at the pump for the $12 you lose out tha back door

cheap ass jokers
50 miles lost using 87?
Where did you get you numbers from? I'm getting 17 or better on 87 octane.

If what your saying is true then I'll switch to 92, but I'm just not finding it to be true in my limited search on the topic: (read 2nd paragraph in the first link)
http://ask.cars.com/2007/07/premium-gasolin.html

http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/cons...tos/aut12.shtm

Just for the hell of it I'll run a few tanks of 92 through to see if it works.

I'm not a cheap ass joker, I just don't like paying extra if there's no benefit. Besides, based on your calculations you would be the cheap-ass joker in this scenario since your actually paying less per mile than I do...
__________________
...just call me Radio.

Last edited by 12_Volt_Dave; 08-13-2007 at 10:04 PM.
12_Volt_Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2007, 01:59 PM   #14 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Member # 11359
Location: The Promised Land
Posts: 359
I've filled my FJ with premium exactly once in my 14 months of ownership and on highway get about 19-20 mpg if I keep my foot out of it. No pinging, etc.

The one time I did use premium, the difference in power was not perceptible.

Simon
__________________
Fornicate my redemption. I recede to my own bowels!
-Oswald Bates
Simon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2007, 05:28 PM   #15 (permalink)
boulder buddha
 
gnob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Member # 3886
Location: southern oregon
Posts: 3,600
Quote:
Originally Posted by 12_Volt_Dave View Post
50 miles lost using 87?
Where did you get you numbers from? I'm getting 17 or better on 87 octane.

If what your saying is true then I'll switch to 92, but I'm just not finding it to be true in my limited search on the topic: (read 2nd paragraph in the first link)
http://ask.cars.com/2007/07/premium-gasolin.html

http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/cons...tos/aut12.shtm

Just for the hell of it I'll run a few tanks of 92 through to see if it works.

I'm not a cheap ass joker, I just don't like paying extra if there's no benefit. Besides, based on your calculations you would be the cheap-ass joker in this scenario since your actually paying less per mile than I do...
it was just an example, i dont know the real numbers, my manual cruiser pulls down 15-18mpg on 92 octane.
i dont run regular simply based on the fact the 4runner runs like shit on it.
you definately drop mpg on lower octane.
i just was trying to prove a point, that when you think youre saving you arent always saving.
buying shitty gas cost more than just mileage, it creates extra wear on the rig, doesnt burn as clean which leads to build up, lost power, and eventual burnt valves etc.
regardless of what that bulletin says, toyota recommends it for a reason.

and even if you drop only 1 mpg on 19 gallons thats 19 miles, equates essentially to one gallon or the three bucks you thought you saved on the front. and my peace of mind is worth at least 3 bucks
__________________
hold this...

Last edited by gnob; 08-15-2007 at 05:30 PM.
gnob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2007, 12:22 PM   #16 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Member # 76931
Posts: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnob View Post
92

toyota calls for 91 for a reason.
high compression and hotter running.
and you save a whole $3 going to regular...
Toyota recomends 91 octane because that was the fuel used when the engine was dyno tested. You can use any grade of regular gasoline with a minimal loss of HP. or Torque. They recomend 91 to meet published fugures.

Last edited by MoSun; 08-17-2007 at 12:23 PM.
MoSun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 07:05 AM   #17 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Member # 115756
Posts: 1
From the horses mouth...

I work in a Toyota auto plant, this was what an engineer told me. The FJ Cruiser engine/power train is basically the same as the one in the Tacoma and 4-Runner, a 4.0L V6 bolted on to an auto or manual trans. So why do the 4-runner and tacoma require only 87 octane? Simple, they were introduced before the 2007 model year as new models and therefore Toyota didn't care if they where LEV II standard complient, the FJ however does have LEV II certification, but the only way it can do this is on 91 octane. Both engines have the same compression rating 10.0:1 so the "higher comprssion" argument goes out the window. So it's either 239 hp @ 5200 rpm or 236 hp @ 5200 rpm. Torque is 278 lb/ft @ 3800 rpm or 266 lb/ft @ 4000 rpm. Using 87 WILL NOT harm your engine. My FJ has been drinking 87 for about the last 3 months and I've seen no major difference in milage. My right foot is always the reason it drinks too much. So if you want the extra power put 91 in, want to save at the pump 87 is fine. Hope this helps!
bigtarget is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2008, 05:23 AM   #18 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Member # 110617
Posts: 86
With 87 you get pre ignition. Pre ignition is what makes engine ping. Octine is a inhibitor. Higher octine allow the piston to get to optimum extention.
Dustpark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2008, 09:14 PM   #19 (permalink)
Registered User
 
TJnPROGRESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Member # 101642
Location: off wheeling
Posts: 77
filled up last Fri, got 18mpg using 87
TJnPROGRESS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply





Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.