 |
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read | Premium Memberships | Auto Loans |
 |
|
|
Share |
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-02-2012, 11:02 PM
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Member # 215740
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 17
|
Fj40 spacer question
Searched but did not find an answer to my question so here goes. I have a pair of 2" spacers and a pair of 1.5" spacers for the FJ40. Installed the 2" on the front and have a 64-64.5" track width (center of tires), the rear is the 1.5" spacers for a 63-63.5" track width (center of tires). Am I better off with more front track width, more rear, or run it square? It is SOA, 39.5 iroks, driven to the trail.
Thanks Sean Last edited by lbz34; 05-02-2012 at 11:05 PM. |
|
|
|
05-03-2012, 06:38 AM
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
181
Join Date: Feb 2000
Member # 181
Location: 100 miles from Ershim Lake
Posts: 1,740
|
I don't see a problem. The front is wider than the rear anyway. Keep an eye on the lugs holding the spacers on and also the trunion bearings in the knuckles.
__________________
Team Member: G-Man Racing #213 |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
05-03-2012, 04:20 PM
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Member # 91729
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 262
|
Allot of guys run a narrower rear including me. A narrower rear allows the rear to make it around obstacles a bit easier.
my 2 cents Quote:
__________________
Jim Dickey Landcruiser Specialist [url]http://www.wix.com/jimdickey/landcruiser[/url] |
|
|
|
|
|
05-03-2012, 04:39 PM
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Metal-tech'in
Join Date: Mar 2002
Member # 10420
Location: Newberg (Portland) OR
Posts: 1,554
|
Quote:
__________________
Metal Tech Made in the USA! ALL Active duty US Military get 10% off Metal-tech brand – thank you for your service! |
|
|
|
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:11 AM.