![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Rock God
|
Yup. Everything's the same as the FJ40 except for the longer driver's side inner axle and of course the axle housing too.
HTH. Jimmy <IMG SRC="smilies/glasses.gif" border="0">
__________________
How is it that the typical brainwashed liberal preaches tolerance, yet is so easily offended
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2001
Member # 6816
Location: Fawk if I know
Posts: 15,275
|
i'm pretty sure that the fj60 frame is wider, therefor you'd have to outboard the springs on the fj40 or move the spring perches closer together on the fj60 axles. a buddy of mine is putting a set of 60 axles in a fj45 wagon right now and he had to outboard the springs.
good luck, georg <IMG SRC="smilies/bounce2.gif" border="0"> <IMG SRC="smilies/bounce2.gif" border="0"> <IMG SRC="smilies/bounce2.gif" border="0">
__________________
Maybe you outta stick to legos! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
Given the choice?? D60's front and rear. However, initial cost will be quite a bit higher.
D44's, IMO, are not enough of an upgrade to make much difference. FJ60 axles have the same birfield weakness as the minitrucks and 40 series trucks. The advantage is if you run with mostly minis-cruisers then you have greater change of available parts. The disadvantage is you may be breaking more often.
__________________
Brian 'woody' Swearingen - IH8MUD Inc. '74 FJ40, '95 HZJ75, '96 FZJ80, '03 2500 DMax, '09 RZR |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Member # 3760
Location: Kamloops BC
Posts: 987
|
look at the size difference in the axle shafts too. The rear 60 axles are huge!! good luck breaking one of those
__________________
83 BJ60 DD,74 FJ40 crawler Be Canadian, Eat beaver!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Member # 3899
Location: Spanish Springs
Posts: 119
|
Dog House states
Quote:
Mike |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
minitruck birfields are the same as 60 series birfields. Later 40 series birfields (79+) are also the same.
76-78 40 series birfields are another, slightly smaller size. 69-75 birfields are all the same, coarse spline outers, and quite weak. 68-earlier are their own animal completely and frankly should just be replaced with a newer axle entirely.
__________________
Brian 'woody' Swearingen - IH8MUD Inc. '74 FJ40, '95 HZJ75, '96 FZJ80, '03 2500 DMax, '09 RZR |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Moderating Midget
|
If I had to do it all over, I would rather have run a D44 in the front than tried all the "Birfield" fixes.
Although I don't have to worry about it any more <IMG SRC="smilies/biggrin.gif" border="0"> I think the U-joint is a better option than the Birfield. Have you seen the D44 Ujoint that Jesse at High Angle has produced? Whew, giddy up!
__________________
Nolen Grogan 1997 FZJ-80 Land Cruiser, 37's 2010 RZR-4 www.cottonlandcruisers.com www.rockmidgetphotography.com USAF Veteran 1988-1998 GOD Bless America |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|