You bring up a lot of good facts. I'm sure if i searched I could bring up facts that refute yours and round and round we go. For me this comes down to what I think happened and how am i going to vote?
I read the transcript of the phone call. I see nothing wrong with it. I'm sure conversations like this go on all the time. As for hunter biden not doing anything wrong? Thats a nice little misdirection. Hunter did nothing wrong. He got a job because of his name. Some people are just lucky. Joe biden on the other hand laid out on tape in an interview how you do a quid pro quo. He told the ukrane that he is leaving in 6 hours, If you want a billion dollars you will fire this guy. How is this just getting a pass? ( I know why) but everybody is up in arms over what trump "might" have done while tripping over what biden did and not saying anything.
This is my problem with the dems argument.
3-4 months before this "whistleblower" came forward the law was changed so that secondhand knowledge was acceptable. Before it was only direct first hand knowledge. You can't be found guilty in small claims court on second hand knowledge but it's enough to start impeachment proceedings against a president?
Schiff lied about having contact with the whistle blower before they came forward. Why is schiff not being held accountable for lying?
Dems are lying that it is illegal to reveal the whistleblower's name? You hear this 20 times a day. On NPR the other day they had legal experts on and there is nothing that says a whistleblowers identity cannot be named. Again. Why is nobody calling this out?
But dems are awesome at creating the narrative. Taking a page right out of the joeseph goebbels play book they and the MSM have repeated this lie enough times that the majority of people probably think it is againt the law and that if trump says anything it will look bad for him. Well done dems.
It just came out that the ambassador from the Ukrane who testified that she had no contact with the dems actually had contact with a dem congressional staffer about a "quite delicate" and "time sensitive"
matter 2 days after the whistleblower went public through her personal email account and not her gov account. I guess lying is ok when dems do it.
And the last thing is that the lawyer for the whistleblower tweeted in 2017 that " A coup has started" and that "we will get rid of him" Clearly not biased.
Let be honest here. Trump has done nothing that other presidens have not been doing while in office. At least he did not send our enemies a billion dollars. The dems want him out because they don't like him. They want him out and have been searching for a way to remove him since the election. It should be the other way around. He should do something wrong and then there should be talk about impeachment. This is the first partisan impeachment ever.
Someday there will be a dem president. I hope the dems are keeping track of all the new rules they are making.