White House 'will not co-operate with impeachment inquiry' - Pirate4x4.Com : 4x4 and Off-Road Forum
 
Pirate4x4.Com : 4x4 and Off-Road Forum  

Go Back   Pirate4x4.Com : 4x4 and Off-Road Forum > Miscellaneous > General Chit-Chat
Notices

Reply
 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-09-2019, 04:02 AM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
ukjeeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Member # 10091
Location: UK
Posts: 7,311
Send a message via Skype™ to ukjeeper
White House 'will not co-operate with impeachment inquiry'

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-49981806

The White House has officially refused to co-operate with the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump.

A letter sent to Democratic leaders rejected it as "baseless" and "constitutionally invalid".

Three Democratic-led House committees are investigating Mr Trump.

The inquiry is trying to find out if the president held back aid to Ukraine to push it to investigate Joe Biden, who is running for the Democratic presidential nomination.


The White House letter comes hours after the Trump administration blocked the US ambassador to the European Union from appearing before a congressional impeachment investigation.

What does the letter say?
White House counsel Pat Cipollone addressed the eight-page letter to the leading Democrat and House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi, and the three chairmen of the Democratic committees.

He accused the leaders of setting up an inquiry that "violates fundamental fairness and constitutionally mandated due process".

The letter insisted that, because Democrats did not hold a vote on launching impeachment proceedings in the House, the inquiry was not "constitutionally invalid".
__________________
[QUOTE=Roc Doc;33154377]YUP, the Pirate Bickering Board, aka the best bunch of assholes you've never met.[/QUOTE]
ukjeeper is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-09-2019, 04:55 AM   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Mr.RatBastard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Member # 9307
Location: Orange Beach AL.
Posts: 3,575
They are correct. Thats why Trump dared them to take a vote on the inquiry. They dont want to because then Trump has rights to help his defense and they may not get the votes needed. To be accurate Trump wont co-operate with Palosi, Schif scam. They are the ones not following procedure and Trump would be a fool to play along and not point it out.
Once again he is calling out people which makes him seam unpresidential making some people uncomfortable( they prefer lies that make them warm and fuzzy) fixing shit is hard just like China. This should have been the norm over the last 25 years then the corruption wouldnt be so prevalent.
__________________
.
Mr.RatBastard is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-09-2019, 05:11 AM   #3 (permalink)
Gravity Works!
 
Landslide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Member # 25608
Location: One foot in the grave
Posts: 30,931
WH wants to drag it out also. All the Dems running are senators and if this gets into next year, they’ll have to stop campaigning to deal with this shit. They can’t do both.
__________________
Peg Leg Fab Lab
Landslide is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-09-2019, 05:45 AM   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Member # 118035
Location: Front Royal, VA
Posts: 10,526
why didnt they just vote to start impeachment inquiry formally? Oh because it might hurt swing state votes and reps in purple states. Oh and they might not have the votes.

"But lets just do it anyways, regardless of its constitutionality. how dare he not cooperate! " - nancy pelosi
__________________
Quote:
I haven't looked into the dog laws....except for the one about fucking them.
IEATRKS84 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-09-2019, 05:49 AM   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Member # 198851
Location: In a state of insanity
Posts: 5,212
Certainly an issue for the lawyers to argue...It may go to the Supreme Court....I was in college when Nixon went down..The media blitz on Nixon was very similar to this Trump situation, you can't appreciate it unless you were there at the time...
ADChevy4x4 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-09-2019, 06:06 AM   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Benzz0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Member # 22923
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 27,738
And the WH should not cooperate. NAncy and Schiff need to follow due process and STFU or get the votes for it. Until then, fuck off cunt :rofl:
__________________
كافر
Benzz0 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-09-2019, 06:23 AM   #7 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Member # 67681
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 28,148
So, what the dems did was unconstitutional? Uh, that means "illegal", right?
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
rugger is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-09-2019, 06:26 AM   #8 (permalink)
Gravity Works!
 
Landslide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Member # 25608
Location: One foot in the grave
Posts: 30,931
https://www.usnews.com/news/politics...y-with-inquiry
__________________
Peg Leg Fab Lab
Landslide is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-09-2019, 06:48 AM   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
ckupq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Member # 121718
Location: MI
Posts: 530
Quote:
Originally Posted by Landslide View Post
I don't know how I feel about this. On one side I'm like "Oh shit Trump got someone worth a shit. Maybe he'll be like Mattis and reign in Trump a bit so the news don't have so many talking points." on the other side I'm like "This guy is Rand Paul lite, at most he'll be a stopper, at best he'll just be a didntdonuffin."
ckupq is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-09-2019, 06:55 AM   #10 (permalink)
Non-Lemming
 
SanDiegoCJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Member # 840
Location: Ramona, SoCal
Posts: 78,511
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.RatBastard View Post
They are correct. Thats why Trump dared them to take a vote on the inquiry. They dont want to because then Trump has rights to help his defense and they may not get the votes needed. To be accurate Trump wont co-operate with Palosi, Schif scam. They are the ones not following procedure and Trump would be a fool to play along and not point it out.
Once again he is calling out people which makes him seam unpresidential making some people uncomfortable( they prefer lies that make them warm and fuzzy) fixing shit is hard just like China. This should have been the norm over the last 25 years then the corruption wouldnt be so prevalent.
Depends on who you talk to. Each side is claiming they're correct. The "rules" on this are NOT cut and dried, no matter how much each side screams they are. That's why I see this ending up in the court system, which will drag this out, time wise.
__________________
One of the great achievements of science has been, if not to make it impossible for intelligent people to be religious, then at least to make it possible for them not to be religious. We should not retreat from this accomplishment.

Quote:
Salesmen and women. God sells to the ignorant.
SanDiegoCJ is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-09-2019, 06:56 AM   #11 (permalink)
No
 
Filthy McChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Member # 106663
Location: South Park
Posts: 15,430
Burn him he's a witch!
__________________
Durrhh.
Filthy McChevy is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-09-2019, 07:21 AM   #12 (permalink)
Zeus of the Sluice
 
Juztyn00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Member # 52569
Location: Mt. Vernon, IL
Posts: 4,526
Send a message via MSN to Juztyn00
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoCJ View Post
Depends on who you talk to. Each side is claiming they're correct. The "rules" on this are NOT cut and dried, no matter how much each side screams they are. That's why I see this ending up in the court system, which will drag this out, time wise.
Trump is demanding they take the same steps that were taken in Nixon's and Clinton's impeachments as are precedent. It takes all of congress to impeach by a majority vote. Pelosi and Schiff can't do it by themselves. Trump just called their bluff and said the WH is done playing games with them looking for a crime, any crime. Impeach or get off the pot.
Juztyn00 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-09-2019, 07:22 AM   #13 (permalink)
Surgical Shotgunner
 
Texas97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Member # 111524
Location: Texas... we dont F*&*% around
Posts: 15,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by ADChevy4x4 View Post
Certainly an issue for the lawyers to argue...It may go to the Supreme Court....I was in college when Nixon went down..The media blitz on Nixon was very similar to this Trump situation, you can't appreciate it unless you were there at the time...
oh yes, that horrid 1970s media blitz, 3 channels with news on for an hour each day. How did you guys ever avoid the overload??
__________________
shhhh.....
Texas97 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-09-2019, 07:23 AM   #14 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Member # 3937
Location: Who knows?
Posts: 3,793
Just saw CNN's headline on this, "Trump administration declares war on impeachment process and Constitution."
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..." - Thomas Jefferson.
mrboyle is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-09-2019, 07:26 AM   #15 (permalink)
Rock God
 
billdacat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Member # 72617
Location: Utah or bust!
Posts: 2,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas97 View Post
oh yes, that horrid 1970s media blitz, 3 channels with news on for an hour each day. How did you guys ever avoid the overload??
We didn't have this internet thingy....
__________________
Сделайте Америку отличной снова
billdacat is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-09-2019, 07:26 AM   #16 (permalink)
Non-Lemming
 
SanDiegoCJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Member # 840
Location: Ramona, SoCal
Posts: 78,511
Quote:
Originally Posted by Juztyn00 View Post
Trump is demanding they take the same steps that were taken in Nixon's and Clinton's impeachments as are precedent. It takes all of congress to impeach by a majority vote. Pelosi and Schiff can't do it by themselves. Trump just called their bluff and said the WH is done playing games with them looking for a crime, any crime. Impeach or get off the pot.
No, it takes the house to impeach. Nixon was never impeached, he resigned first. To convict in the senate is not a "majority vote", it's 2/3. Pelosi is claiming that "house rules" don't require a full house vote to investigate. Both sides have their arguments and all the pissing matches aren't going to get a resolution. That's why I believe it'll end up in the courts.
__________________
One of the great achievements of science has been, if not to make it impossible for intelligent people to be religious, then at least to make it possible for them not to be religious. We should not retreat from this accomplishment.

Quote:
Salesmen and women. God sells to the ignorant.
SanDiegoCJ is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-09-2019, 07:28 AM   #17 (permalink)
Non-Lemming
 
SanDiegoCJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Member # 840
Location: Ramona, SoCal
Posts: 78,511
Quote:
Originally Posted by ADChevy4x4 View Post
Certainly an issue for the lawyers to argue...It may go to the Supreme Court....I was in college when Nixon went down..The media blitz on Nixon was very similar to this Trump situation, you can't appreciate it unless you were there at the time...
Yup. The media feeding frenzy was something to behold.
__________________
One of the great achievements of science has been, if not to make it impossible for intelligent people to be religious, then at least to make it possible for them not to be religious. We should not retreat from this accomplishment.

Quote:
Salesmen and women. God sells to the ignorant.
SanDiegoCJ is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-09-2019, 07:53 AM   #18 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Member # 198851
Location: In a state of insanity
Posts: 5,212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas97 View Post
oh yes, that horrid 1970s media blitz, 3 channels with news on for an hour each day. How did you guys ever avoid the overload??
Like I said,if you were not there, you have no clue....The media coverage may seem limited to you with an Internet point of view, but it was the only news available then ,but still occupied most every discussion especially with students...And before the internet many discussions were done in real life and you debated face to face.....Nixon raged on and on about being railroaded but was slowly ground down until he bailed out...Obviously his cover up of crimes was more "illegal" than what Trump supposedly did......
ADChevy4x4 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-09-2019, 08:16 AM   #19 (permalink)
Surgical Shotgunner
 
Texas97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Member # 111524
Location: Texas... we dont F*&*% around
Posts: 15,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by ADChevy4x4 View Post
Like I said,if you were not there, you have no clue....The media coverage may seem limited to you with an Internet point of view, but it was the only news available then ,but still occupied most every discussion especially with students...And before the internet many discussions were done in real life and you debated face to face.....Nixon raged on and on about being railroaded but was slowly ground down until he bailed out...Obviously his cover up of crimes was more "illegal" than what Trump supposedly did......
dont confuse the dominance of popular culture and relevant conversations with what you were claiming to be "media blitz". Regardless of the internet, CNN in the 90s spawned the 24 hour news cycle and now you have multiple cable news channels, satellite radio, with constant opinion reporting and propaganda to sway public opinion.

so, while it may have been on every channel back in the 70s, your media intake was 3 channels, the national and local newspapers, and possibly one AM radio station, depending on what city you lived in.

compared to today, the media blitz from then was minuscule.
__________________
shhhh.....
Texas97 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-09-2019, 08:29 AM   #20 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Mr.RatBastard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Member # 9307
Location: Orange Beach AL.
Posts: 3,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoCJ View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.RatBastard View Post
They are correct. Thats why Trump dared them to take a vote on the inquiry. They dont want to because then Trump has rights to help his defense and they may not get the votes needed. To be accurate Trump wont co-operate with Palosi, Schif scam. They are the ones not following procedure and Trump would be a fool to play along and not point it out.
Once again he is calling out people which makes him seam unpresidential making some people uncomfortable( they prefer lies that make them warm and fuzzy) fixing shit is hard just like China. This should have been the norm over the last 25 years then the corruption wouldnt be so prevalent.
Depends on who you talk to. Each side is claiming they're correct. The "rules" on this are NOT cut and dried, no matter how much each side screams they are. That's why I see this ending up in the court system, which will drag this out, time wise.
Your're right, evidently the House can make up their own rules as they go. I think Trump wants it to end up in the courts and Nancy and Schiff do not.
__________________
.
Mr.RatBastard is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-09-2019, 08:32 AM   #21 (permalink)
Non-Lemming
 
SanDiegoCJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Member # 840
Location: Ramona, SoCal
Posts: 78,511
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.RatBastard View Post
Your're right, evidently the House can make up their own rules as they go. I think Trump wants it to end up in the courts and Nancy and Schiff do not.
That's basically it.
__________________
One of the great achievements of science has been, if not to make it impossible for intelligent people to be religious, then at least to make it possible for them not to be religious. We should not retreat from this accomplishment.

Quote:
Salesmen and women. God sells to the ignorant.
SanDiegoCJ is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-09-2019, 08:47 AM   #22 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Member # 55560
Location: Central Valley, CA
Posts: 2,626
It's highly unlikely enough Senate republicans will vote to remove him leaving this entire mess as a very expensive censure vote from the House.
__________________
A bunch of old crap
Mattafact is online now   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-09-2019, 08:53 AM   #23 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Member # 138630
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.RatBastard View Post
Your're right, evidently the House can make up their own rules as they go. I think Trump wants it to end up in the courts and Nancy and Schiff do not.
It certainly seems that way.
jcd1026 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-09-2019, 09:15 AM   #24 (permalink)
Old School
 
Technohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Member # 130090
Location: Surrounded by socialists (Exeter, RI)
Posts: 1,792
Why should they cooperate?
__________________
-Eric
Redneck-at-Large
Technohead is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-09-2019, 09:19 AM   #25 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Member # 4387
Location: In your head
Posts: 12,183
It's obviously a partisan which hunt, I predict this ends badly for Pelosi and the Dems. Trump is a master troll, and is probably baiting the Dems into a trap with every move.
Norm is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Pirate4x4.Com : 4x4 and Off-Road Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

** A VERIFICATION EMAIL IS SENT TO THIS ADDRESS TO COMPLETE REGISTRATION!! **

Email Address:
Insurance
Please select your insurance company (Optional)

Log-in


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.