We all want to take all the judgement calls out of the sport. I think if Tracy goes back and thinks about it he'll see the right call was made. Hitting the cone.....if the judge saw it, you saw it and the spotter didnt then kinda tough on their part to say it wasnt a cone. I've never been one to like the cones with the bases on them due to it increasing the area of the cone and not having a specific "point" on the course. If everyone has to deal with it. So be it.
The rear steer....if it moved it moved. Now, I've seen rear steer on climbs when the vehicle is denied that on return to the bottom the rear steer will get pinned by force of the tires if they are hit sideways by a rock or something. Do we call that rear steer also? Tough call. If the tires wiggled on course due to some faulty part, that sucks. Really does, if it moved about a half inch I dont think it helps but you also cant begin to have grey areas to determine certain situations for competitors. Like you said it would open a huge case of worms.
I think you made the right calls on both circumstances. Just sucks on both sides. I for one havent seen the thread.
The rear steer....if it moved it moved. Now, I've seen rear steer on climbs when the vehicle is denied that on return to the bottom the rear steer will get pinned by force of the tires if they are hit sideways by a rock or something. Do we call that rear steer also? Tough call. If the tires wiggled on course due to some faulty part, that sucks. Really does, if it moved about a half inch I dont think it helps but you also cant begin to have grey areas to determine certain situations for competitors. Like you said it would open a huge case of worms.
I think you made the right calls on both circumstances. Just sucks on both sides. I for one havent seen the thread.