Pirate 4x4 banner

1 - 20 of 89 Posts

·
Moderator
Joined
·
1,848 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Winch Hill 3 has had no true bypass for quite a while now and the Squeeze has become hard enough that one is really needed. The entire left side of the hill is not short wheelbase friendly at all. In order to restore a bypass to the Squeeze and the very steep other available lines The Tahoe National Forest along with the FOF and representatives for a couple of the Adopt-a-Trail clubs will be doing some blasting Thursday June 19th to create an optional bypass line with a gradual slope to it. Don't worry, the Squeeze won't be touched and the far left line will remain as is. The plan is to create the new line slightly right of middle on the former bypass side and restore a good trail experience for all levels of users.

If you plan to be on the trail this coming Thursday the 19th and approach Winch Hill 3 you'll see red danger tape when the blasting is going to commence. Please use caution.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,458 Posts
I know it's a pretty tough section, but it is called a winch hill. I'd rather see a set winch point put in rather than making the trail easier by blasting rock. I appreciate all the work you guys do but more and more it seems like fordyce is turning into the rubicon.

Being challenged is or at least was part of this sport. All groups should have at least one winch in their group or at least a tow strap. Can people really not safely navigate this section with a winch and or tow strap? Seems like we're promoting people to bring clapped out rigs with no recovery gear to the trail.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,964 Posts
I know it's a pretty tough section, but it is called a winch hill. I'd rather see a set winch point put in rather than making the trail easier by blasting rock. I appreciate all the work you guys do but more and more it seems like fordyce is turning into the rubicon.

Being challenged is or at least was part of this sport. All groups should have at least one winch in their group or at least a tow strap. Can people really not safely navigate this section with a winch and or tow strap? Seems like we're promoting people to bring clapped out rigs with no recovery gear to the trail.
Haven't been there lately have you? If your wheelbase is short and you have to go down the "bypass" there is a very strong chance your going ass over teakettle... I think it's a safety issue and I applaud the effort to make a safe alternative for smaller rigs without safety equipment... There is still a winch hill there if you feel the need to show is all how big you wiener is:flipoff2:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,361 Posts
I know it's a pretty tough section, but it is called a winch hill. I'd rather see a set winch point put in rather than making the trail easier by blasting rock. I appreciate all the work you guys do but more and more it seems like fordyce is turning into the rubicon.

Being challenged is or at least was part of this sport. All groups should have at least one winch in their group or at least a tow strap. Can people really not safely navigate this section with a winch and or tow strap? Seems like we're promoting people to bring clapped out rigs with no recovery gear to the trail.
im almost ALWAYS against blasting the trail to make it easier(wasnt a fan of the blasting last year) but i completely support this blasting, as dragrcr65 mentioned its VERY steep and going down it with a short wheel base is very sketchy/dangerous, having a winch anchor would be great for going up but its going down that would be the problem.

if you regularly go to fordyce year after year you will notice the trail gets more difficult every year, i wouldnt call this making it "easier", IMO its restoring it to the way it used to be a few years ago.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,361 Posts
Haven't been there lately have you? If your wheelbase is short and you have to go down the "bypass" there is a very strong chance your going ass over teakettle... I think it's a safety issue and I applaud the effort to make a safe alternative for smaller rigs without safety equipment... There is still a winch hill there if you feel the need to show is all how big you wiener is:flipoff2:
once my 43" sx stickies show up im doing pillow line in reverse :flipoff2:
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,458 Posts
Just my opinion, just remember as everything changes I was the guy that said we shouldn't be blowing up the trail to child proof it so some people that are to lazy to use a tow strap and a winch don't roll their rig.
Hell it already happening who do you think is driving up the committee bypass, clapped out rigs that are semi broke and too lazy to get yanked out the real trail
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,964 Posts
Right, because everyone has to have big bad rigs to have fun and experience the trail, you shouldn't have to have a full cage, 40+" tires and 115" wheelbase to safely use the trail. When/if someone gets killed because its schetchy, the people trying to take our trails will have more ammo.... I see your point, and I can assure you I am not driving a "small rig without safety equipment, but I see this work as a good thing...
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,919 Posts
Hell it already happening who do you think is driving up the committee bypass, clapped out rigs that are semi broke and too lazy to get yanked out the real trail
False. It's almost 50/50 with each report we have received in regards to that. Buggies/Jeeps/Normal Rigs/Etc
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
278 Posts
Right, because everyone has to have big bad rigs to have fun and experience the trail, you shouldn't have to have a full cage, 40+" tires and 115" wheelbase to safely use the trail. When/if someone gets killed because its schetchy, the people trying to take our trails will have more ammo.... I see your point, and I can assure you I am not driving a "small rig without safety equipment, but I see this work as a good thing...
I figured out how to make it up and down just fine in a mild built jeep. next thing you know there will be a bridge over the river because the water is too wet right? I see your point too. I know the FOF is in a better position to make these calls, I'm just voicing the fact that I'm bummed to see one of my favorite sections of trail happily be modified
 

·
FOF
Joined
·
8,202 Posts
Bret clearly stated the fun obstacles we love will still be there. The need to make a true bypass a little safer will also help deter any more ding dogs from trailblazing up the side of the hill hopefully. This is a good thing doesn't mean it will get turned into that other trail across the hill.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,361 Posts
I figured out how to make it up and down just fine in a mild built jeep. next thing you know there will be a bridge over the river because the water is too wet right? I see your point too. I know the FOF is in a better position to make these calls, I'm just voicing the fact that I'm bummed to see one of my favorite sections of trail happily be modified
so when did you start coming to fordyce? are you aware of the fact that section of trail has vastly eroded over the last 5 years? should FOF stand by while the trail erodes to the point where you need 54" tires in a buggy to make it through? the funniest part of this is the fact that were discussing a bypass, and theres two of them, with only one of the bypasses being altered. the original trail is being left alone and so is one of the bypasses, maybe you would be happier if the TNF came in and closed off both bypasses completely, leaving only the original route? can your mildly built jeep even make it up the left or right lines or is the middle line theyre blowing up the only line you can make?

over on the rubicon they close bypasses and blow up the main trail to make it easy, i for one applaud Bret and the FOF for leaving the main trail alone and making the bypass easier.
 

·
FOF
Joined
·
2,864 Posts
over on the rubicon they close bypasses and blow up the main trail to make it easy, i for one applaud Bret and the FOF for leaving the main trail alone and making the bypass easier.
This /\.


I will add that right now there is room for 4 wide going up WH3.(3 up the bypass side and 1 up the squeeze.) The work being done is to make 1 line safer. FOF has worked with the forest service to make sure these "fixes" always allow a harder line to remain, (ie 40k hill) and not to just pave the trail. No body wants another Rubicon, especially FOF.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
278 Posts
so when did you start coming to fordyce? are you aware of the fact that section of trail has vastly eroded over the last 5 years? should FOF stand by while the trail erodes to the point where you need 54" tires in a buggy to make it through? the funniest part of this is the fact that were discussing a bypass, and theres two of them, with only one of the bypasses being altered. the original trail is being left alone and so is one of the bypasses, maybe you would be happier if the TNF came in and closed off both bypasses completely, leaving only the original route? can your mildly built jeep even make it up the left or right lines or is the middle line theyre blowing up the only line you can make?

over on the rubicon they close bypasses and blow up the main trail to make it easy, i for one applaud Bret and the FOF for leaving the main trail alone and making the bypass easier.
I just said the FOF is in a better position to make these calls. and I'm glad they're involved. I literally said none of the things you're yelling about.

all I am is on the side of the fence that is against any modifications. good or bad. but I understand that there are people who can't navigate the trail safely and we have to baby proof it for them. you guys wanna put a big sign in front of the mineshaft too? 2 guys drove into it last summer
 
1 - 20 of 89 Posts
Top