Pirate 4x4 banner

36 inch IROK Radials

2 reading
46K views 74 replies 38 participants last post by  Sim79  
#1 · (Edited)
I got my 36/13.50-15 IROK Radials today and I thought I'd share some info about them.

First of all, they're going on an 85 4Runner. I'd post pictures, but they look identical to the bias-ply IROKs that we've all already seen. The only exception is that the carcass is much more squared off, nowhere near as round as the bias ply version, regardless of whether the tire is mounted or unmounted. The 36 inch bias IROKs look retarded on a 10 inch wide rim; they look like baloons because they're so round. I had these radials mounted on some 15x8 steel rockcrawler rims, which looks to be perfect. They have a nice fat footprint on the ground. And fawk wheel weights, I went with Equal so hopefully these suckers won't shake my fillings out.

The biggest difference between the bias and radial versions is weight. I read in an earlier thread that the radials are supposedly lightweight. Well, that is absolutely not the case. While the bias ply version is definitely lighter than it looks (supposedly 66lbs for a 36/13.50-15), this radial of the same size measured 82 pounds on the scale at our shop. For comparison's sake, I weighed a 37/12.50-15 SSR (which are known for being heavy) and that tire was only 78lbs on the same scale. Mounted on the steel 15x8, the total for the IROK came to 108lbs. I'm kind of disappointed that they're so heavy, but I really prefer the squared-off profile of the radial vs. the round profile of the bias. Just looking at the two tires, you can tell which one is going to last longer on the street.

And yes, I know pavement is for pussies, but I prefer to drive my Rubicon toy to work so street life is (an admittedly small) factor in my decision to go with these tires. :flipoff2: :flipoff2: :flipoff2:

I haven't mounted the tires on my rig yet, since my 4Runner only has room for 33's under it at the moment. As soon as I get a day or two off from work, I'll tear into the bitch and put the new axles, suspension, and steering under it and see how they do. I'll definitely be seeing some of you guys on the 'Con this summer, so hopefully I'll have some good impressions of them to share by then. :beer:
 
#3 ·
The sidewall is very thick. I don't anticipate any problems. They may not be SX's, but they're sure as hell a lot better than the :rainbow: BFGs or MT/Rs.

As for the rubber compound, it's gotta be the same as the bias ply version of the tire. In other words, VERY soft. But considering the fact that the tires have such a nice flat footprint that won't flex excessively on the pavement like the round bias ply version does, I wouldn't be surprised if these radials lasted twice as long as the bias ply IROKs.

Of course, the only way to substantiate such a claim would be to run the bias ply's on one side of the truck and the radials on the other side and see which one wins, but I think it's safe to say the radials will last substantially longer than the bias ply's will.

The radials may have some drawbacks compared to the bias ply's on the trail, but for a true dual-purpose tire, I think I'm going to be pretty happy with these radial IROKs on both the trail and the street.
 
#8 ·
Ok, lets say I dont give a shzit about tread life or streetability (cause I dont):flipoff2: Which tire will hold up better in the rocks? A buddy has been running the bias 39.5's for about 8 months and he wheels every weekend in sharp Arizona rocks. His sidewalls show some scuffs but no more than my SX's, so I dont think the round sidewalls are an issue. Would the radials provide better traction? And if so, is the durabilty equal?

Thanks
Flatfenderman
 
#10 ·
If you put radials on 1 side and Bias on the other you will find it uncontrolable at hi-way speed.
Trust me ...I wrecked a pick-up doing this exact test about 10yrs ago .
Someone warned me but I thought " ya right ...tire pull can't be that bad "...but after ramping it off a coulvert I had to agree :nuke:
 
#11 ·
I've been running the bias plys on my DD for about a month now. I drive a shitload of miles too(85+/day). Yes, they balloon, but they handle better than my 37" MTRs did IMO. I use the stick on wheel weights on the inner wheel and duct tape them on. Haven't noticed any rough ride what-so-ever as they do not flat spot at all like other swampers. They are the same size as my 37s too but obviously wider. I run thema round 23psi since I do drive quite a bit. I played with several air pressures from 18-30psi on the street, and like the ride at 23 the best.

Much better wet traction than the MTRs too. We've gotten quite a bit of rain in SoCal the last month or so. I've only run them on Wrecking Ball off-road, but they hooked up fine. I'll have them at TDS as of tomorrow and I sure as hell hope they hook up just as good. I liked my MTRs, and had no complaints with them at all. I like the Iroks just as much though too.

A set of 37" radials is likely in my future depending on how long these last.
 
#12 ·
Here's a shot of my 36" IROK Radials on a 10" wheel.

You probably could have used wheel weights and been fine, three of mine took less than 3 ounces to balance, one took 6.

I can't comment on performance, on or off the road. My driveshafts will be done tomorrow, then we'll see....

gtisamurai: I'm running ~7" of lift on my truck if that helps you visualize what yours is gonna look like. ;)


Image
 
#13 ·
gtisamurai said:
I got my 36/13.50-15 IROK Radials today and I thought I'd share some info about them.

The biggest difference between the bias and radial versions is weight. I read in an earlier thread that the radials are supposedly lightweight. Well, that is absolutely not the case. While the bias ply version is definitely lighter than it looks (supposedly 66lbs for a 36/13.50-15), this radial of the same size measured 82 pounds on the scale at our shop. For comparison's sake, I weighed a 37/12.50-15 SSR (which are known for being heavy) and that tire was only 78lbs on the same scale
That seems a little strange.
Lance and I weighed my 39.5 IROKs and they only weighed 88 lbs.
It seems like the 39.5" would weigh more than 6lbs over the 36".
 
#25 ·
Re: Re: 36 inch IROK Radials

H8monday said:


That seems a little strange.
Lance and I weighed my 39.5 IROKs and they only weighed 88 lbs.
It seems like the 39.5" would weigh more than 6lbs over the 36".
Yes, but yours are the bias ply version, aren't they? Also keep in mind that different scales report different weights. I can't say what the accuracy of the scale at our shop is, but that's why I weighed the 37" SSR for comparison's sake. Assuming our scale is reasonably accurate, the radial 36's are approximately 18 pounds heavier than the bias ply version!
 
#26 ·
Re: Re: Re: 36 inch IROK Radials

gtisamurai said:


Yes, but yours are the bias ply version, aren't they? Also keep in mind that different scales report different weights. I can't say what the accuracy of the scale at our shop is, but that's why I weighed the 37" SSR for comparison's sake. Assuming our scale is reasonably accurate, the radial 36's are approximately 18 pounds heavier than the bias ply version!

I have 39.5x13.50 x 15 radials.

We also weighed a brand new 37" (17") Krawler, which are supposed to be substantialy heavier than an IROK, and it weighed in at 83lbs.