Pirate 4x4 banner

Tire size on a chevy 2500 non HD? 265 or 285?

23K views 13 replies 12 participants last post by  MudTJ  
#1 ·
I'm looking at picking up a new set of Mastercraft Courser C/T's, 265/75R16's for my 99 chevy 2500 (4x4 if that matters)... But the place I was going to get the tires from has a set of 285's that I can get for $130 a tire. The 285's are load range D but only have like 30lbs less of a load rating than the E rated 256's. I only tow a 16' flat bed and various Jeeps and junk trucks, no goose necks or 5th wheels or campers. Plus I figure the 285's should lower my effective gear ratio so about what 3.73's with stock tires would be. Right now with the 245's and 4.10 gears the old 6.0 revs pretty good down the road.

Anyway, opinions on going to a 285 on a non HD chevy 2500? How about rim width on the stock rims? Probably have to run lower presure on the 285's to get them to wear flat, which wouldn't be good for towing.
 
#2 ·
Probably not what you want to hear, but a friend of mine put 235-85's on the same truck as yours. They are a little narrow, but it gives you the 33" height of the 285's and fits on the stock rims. Plus, no rubbing even when using chains (for mud) for those northern Nevada hunting excursions. Not sure on the load ratings though.
 
#4 ·
hpi_jeep said:
i have 265's on my truck and imo there the perfect size and i dont ever have to worry about overloading the tires (the truck is a different story though)

anyway here is a pic. and might i suggest these tires! there pretty nice.
http://www.gilmoremotors.com/discus/download.php?id=127
Thats a nice looking truck, the 265's look good on it.

Yeah those are nice tires but do not do very well in snowy or muddy conditions. We run those on our work trucks because of the high mileage they get out of them. But the drivers complain about the poor winter traction. Plus they are very spendy, about $190 a piece around here.

I'm looking at these: http://www.mastercrafttires.com/us/en/ProductDetails.asp?ProdType=LtTruck&id=209&title=Light+Truck+Tires
Image


Here is a pic of my truck...

http://tinypic.com/view/?pic=jpc6fp
 
#7 ·
Cougar67 said:
I work at a tire shop and it is way easier to put on 265's than it is to put on 285's. If you want to make the 285's fit you need to crank up your torsion bars and trim the fenders a bit.
I have had both 305's and 285's on my 03 GMC HD. I needed to trim about 1/8th" of my front air dam. (the part that rolls back around to reinforce itself) and nothing off my fenders.

On the 1/2 tons and light duty 3/4's, I'd bet you'd need to crank the t-bars to level the truck and you should be able to get away without trimming. 265's still look too dinky.
 
#8 ·
I work at a gmc dealership and we install a lot of 285's on the hd's. I installed a set on a 2500 non hd and had to max out the torsion bars and it was still very close. I would go with the 265 on the non-hd. I have 305's on my 2500hd with 8 inch wheels, had to trim the front airdam/bumper area.

Good luck
 
#12 ·
I think with as narrow as the stock rims are i'm better off with the 265's. Plus then I can get the proper load range E. Looks like its spit if the 285's will fit. I think with a quick trim of the front air dam they will fit perfectly fine. But with 16x8 rims with a different offset might be a problem.
 
#14 · (Edited)
i'm gonna replace my tires on my 02 2500HD with the 6.0 and 4.10's soon, i'm debating between 265s and 285's, its not fitment i'm worried about it gearing and towing. How much will 285 change my gas milage over stock(with 245's) i assume it may help since it will keep my rpm's a little lower? What i'm really worried about is towing though; used to when i pulled my jeep with a half ton with the 5.3 3.73's and 265 it would drop to 2nd gear pulling my jeep up hills on the interstate. My 2500 has never done that, will changing to 285s make my truck have to drop to 2nd on interstate hills when towing like the half tone did or should it still be able to hold 3rd. I love the look of the 285's but not if its gonna screw up my towing ability too much.